60
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Reports

Solitary Glomus Tumor on the Base of the Right Thumb: A Rare Case Report and a Literature Review from Saudi Arabia

ORCID Icon
Pages 371-380 | Received 14 Jan 2024, Accepted 09 Apr 2024, Published online: 23 Apr 2024

Abstract

A glomus tumor (GT) is a rare and usually benign tumor that originates from the glomus body, which is involved in thermoregulation in the skin. Solitary or multiple, digital or extra-digital, these cutaneous tumors can be benign or malignant. This report describes the diagnosis and surgical management of a solitary glomus tumor at the base of the right thumb in a young Sudanese woman. The diagnosis of glomus tumor was confirmed by medical history, sonographic findings and histopathological report. The lesion was excised via direct complete excision under local anesthesia, resulting in a complete resolution of symptoms. Owing to its high sensitivity level, the use of ultrasound is appropriate to evaluate a lesion suspected to be a glomus tumor. A clinician needs to take into consideration the likelihood of glomus tumors when assessing a patient who has a skin lesion on fingers, toes, or extra-digital area, with pain triggered by temperature changes, pressure, or touch. Additionally, this report includes a review of recent globally reported cases of glomus tumor in the hand to highlight the distinctiveness of this report in context to its atypical location in the area of the thenar eminence and underscoring it as a unique report of its kind from Saudi Arabia.

Introduction

Glomus tumor usually appears as a painful dermal lesion consisting of glomus cells.Citation1 The most common occurrence is underneath the nail plate which is termed a subungual glomus tumor (SGT).Citation2 A glomus tumor may, however, also develop at other sites; in these cases, it is called a glomus extra-digital tumor (GET). Most often, extra-digital glomus tumors present as painful nodules on the arms, legs, trunk, head or any internal organs.Citation3

The absence of the typical GT-related cold sensitivity along with atypical location of the lesion can often delay its diagnosis.Citation4,Citation5 Though most glomus tumors are benign, malignant ones can typically measure over 2 centimeters and affect the visceral organs.Citation6,Citation7 Female patients are more likely to have glomus tumors,Citation8 while there is no established gender predisposition for these tumors.Citation9,Citation10 Considering the limited effectiveness of anti-inflammatory drugs,Citation11 a full excision of the lesion is the only option to relieve pain. As a bloody field may prevent complete excision and lead to recurrence,Citation12 tumor removal is performed in a bloodless field under loupe magnification, with tourniquet application.Citation13,Citation14

Other painful tumors such as neuroma, leiomyoma, hemangioma, and conditions such as gouty arthritis should be considered as a part of a differential diagnosis while assessing solitary glomus tumors.Citation15 A neuroma may produce similar pain symptoms and have a trigger zone, but it will not exhibit hypersensitivity to cold.Citation16 On the other hand, melanoma would not cause pain and would be visible beneath the skin.Citation17 It is crucial to carefully distinguish multiple glomus tumors, which may be painless, from cavernous hemangiomaCitation18 and blue rubber nevus syndrome.Citation19 Both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have a comparably high sensitivity and are preferred in confirming the tumor diagnosis of a skin lesion. With established high sensitivity level, ultrasound modality can be an economic and time-saving alternative for the patients. Although the diagnosis of a glomus tumor can be suspected based on clinical features and radiographic examination, a microscopic evaluation of the lesion is required to establish the diagnosis.Citation20 Due to the uncertain nature of the clinical presentations and unusual anatomical locations, it is very important to report any atypical cases of GT to support earlier diagnosis and thus effective relief of symptoms. The current case report is elaborated and reported in this study with this purpose.

Case Presentation

A 36-year-old woman presented herself for evaluation of a tender area beneath the skin on the base of her right thumb that had been symptomatic for about 6 months. The patient did not recall any history of trauma to the site of lesion. Upon cold exposure, the lesion was very painful with worsening pain and tenderness.

Investigations

On physical examination, the right thumb of the patient showed a 3 millimeter raised erythematous patch surrounded by a flat-topped papule with diameter of 2 millimeters that had a slight central depression (). Standard clinical tests were applied which consisted of the Love’s test, Hildreth test and a cold sensitivity test.Citation12 Love’s test showed an amplified pain with an application of pressure on the location. Hildreth test was deemed positive as there was reduction in tenderness in the area of the lesion when the area was exsanguinated. Cold sensitivity test was positive as the area elicited pain on exposure to cold water. Ultrasound imaging revealed a small nodule beneath the skin which was well defined and hypoechoic along with a prominent vascularity. This was an important finding which was consistent with the glomus tumor diagnosis in this case ().

Figure 1 (a) Preoperative clinical pictures showing a soft nodule suggestive of glomus tumor. (b) Ultrasound images showing a raised size of 1.3×0.7 x 0.5 cm on the base of right thumb. (c) Postoperative image showing direct complete excision approach. (d) Histopathological images showing round to ovoid glomus cells with interspersed fibroblast, delicate vasculature and myxoid stroma. No evidence of necrosis, mycosis and atypia was seen.

Figure 1 (a) Preoperative clinical pictures showing a soft nodule suggestive of glomus tumor. (b) Ultrasound images showing a raised size of 1.3×0.7 x 0.5 cm on the base of right thumb. (c) Postoperative image showing direct complete excision approach. (d) Histopathological images showing round to ovoid glomus cells with interspersed fibroblast, delicate vasculature and myxoid stroma. No evidence of necrosis, mycosis and atypia was seen.

The tissue specimen from the lesion site on microscopic examination showed large nodular clusters of benign cells in the dermis along with compact hyperkeratosis and mild acanthosis that correlated with the typical thickness of the skin at this location (), The basophilic tumor appeared as solid sheets of uniform-appearing glomus cells with sparse smooth muscle and thus identifying it as glomus tumor, classified as the solid type.

Differential Diagnosis

A mucous cyst or a foreign body presence, along with other possible hand tumors were included among the preliminary considerations in the clinical differential diagnosis. Correlated with the patient’s symptoms, ultrasound findings and the lesion morphology, a diagnosis of a glomus tumor was established.

Treatment and Follow Up

A direct complete excisional biopsy under local anesthesia was performed using a 4-millimeter elliptical excisional biopsy tool and the wound was closed with 4–0 absorbable braided sutures (). The histopathological images () showed round to ovoid glomus cells scattered with fibroblast, myxoid stroma with fine vasculature, with no evidence of necrosis, mycosis, and atypia.

Sutures were removed after 2 weeks of the biopsy and the biopsy site had completely healed on examination. No pain was reported at the site of lesion at the 2 weeks follow-up visit. On telephonic follow up during the subsequent 12 months, there was no report of any recurrence of symptoms.

Discussion

An updated prevalence and incidence context is provided here by a comprehensive literature review from a PubMed search of case reports/series from 2019–2023 on glomus tumor on hand among adult patients. Studies report that the incidence of subungual glomus tumor is about 1–6% of all soft tissue tumors in the upper limb, with hand accounting for about 50–75%.Citation21 To provide the context of the current case report, this review focused on glomus tumor of the hand, though it can occur on various locations in the human body.Citation22

An electronic literature search was undertaken with key words such as “glomangioma”, “glomus tumor”, “Saudi Arabia”, “glomangiomyoma”, and “case”. A total of 101 patients were identified from 2019 to January 2024. Tumor topography across the literature included is described in and the patient/sample demographics and characteristics are described in .

Table 1 Tumor Topography from the Reviewed Literature

Table 2 Patient Demography and Tumor Variables from the Reviewed Literature

A total of 101 patients with glomus tumor in the hand were assessed in the literature review included in this case report. As observed from the literature reviewed, GT on the subungual region was the most widely reported with 98 (97.03%), while the digital pulp GTs were 9 (8.91%) and GTs on other parts of the hand were only 7 (6.93%). On assessing the presentation of the size of the GTs reported, tumors smaller than 5 mm were reported among 16 (32.0%) patients and tumors ranging between 5 mm to 1 cm in 29 (58.0%), while 5 (10.0%) had tumor size reports between 1–2 cm. Within the sample from the included literature, there were 4 reports (3.96%) of recurrence of the tumor.

Female gender was the most predominant of all the cases as seen from . No statistical correlation with the recurrences of the tumor could be derived from the variables such as gender and age reported across the literature, which is observable from . As ethnicity cannot be considered as a variable for correlation just based on the region of reporting and publishing, it was not practical to report a reliable conclusion on the ethnic presentation of this case. However it can be mentioned 85.14% (86) of all the cases were reported from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. It is recommended to undertake future cross-sectional studies examining the association between ethnicity and the incidence of GT to provide clinically relevant insights about this condition. is descriptive of the statistical correlation analysis of these observations. The information from the case reports () and case series () reviewed are described in which illustrates the rarity of the anatomical location of the present case.

Table 3 Literature Review Summary from Case Reports of Glomus Tumors on Hand

Table 4 Literature Review Summary from Case Series and Retrospective Studies of Glomus Tumors on Hand

Though the first clinical description of a glomus tumor was reported in 1812 by Wood, as a painful subcutaneous tubercle,Citation40 the histopathological features of the glomus tumor and its emergence from the glomus body were not described until 1924 by Barre and Masson.Citation41 There is no clear understanding of the factors influencing the pathogenesis of glomus tumors and their etiology, including age at onset, gender, family predisposition, and history of trauma to the site.Citation42 Most cases of delayed diagnosis of GT, which could be between 3–15 years,Citation43–45 were due to a lack of awareness about the disease among the general practitioners who usually receive the patients initially, its anatomical presentation and visibility. Most cases go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed for a long period, even with the typical clinical symptoms of pain, pinpoint tenderness, and cold sensitiveness.Citation46,Citation47

It was deemed necessary to report this case, particularly in light of its rarely reported anatomical location (the base of the thumb) and geographical location (Saudi Arabia). An emphasis on the importance in the early diagnosis and management of such cases and the necessity of vigilance in monitoring painful skin lesions is underscored here. There is a need for further investigation of the pathogenesis of this tumor formation and reoccurrence in light of this case report. Ultimately, this case report provides valuable information to the medical community, highlighting the need for continuous research on differential diagnosis and the right diagnostic protocols to follow. A review of previous publications indicates that this is the first case of glomus tumor of the thumb reported from Saudi Arabia.

Conclusion

The present study is a case history with a comprehensive literature review, which points to the disadvantage of proposing causal hypotheses based on the results. It is noted in this study that future research should be designed to appraise genetic factors, bone and tendon involvement, and histological features of hand tumors with an objective to understand and identify possible predictors of reoccurrence of these tumors.

Though MRI is an extremely important tool to help in the diagnosis of glomus tumors,Citation48,Citation49 ultrasound is also deemed efficient enough to confirm the diagnosis as the tumor can be seen as well-defined small hypoechoic nodule/s beneath the affected area.Citation50–52 This present case was early and easily diagnosed with confirmation as glomus tumor from the initial ultrasound scan itself. The direct complete excision offered a greater chance of a cure and thus a better functional outcome.Citation53,Citation54

Documenting occurrence of glomus tumor cases in unusual locations in the literature raises awareness of this condition and reduces the time needed for diagnosis, which could be very long and contribute to severe morbidity to the patient. In order to completely remove glomus tumors and prevent recurrence, accurate preoperative localization is essential.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the College of Medicine, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University (RC12.12.12) in human studies.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study. It is confirmed that the patient’s informed consent for the case details to be published including the publication of the images has been obtained.

Data Sharing Statement

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Disclosure

The author declares no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This study did not receive any external funding.

References

  • Álvarez‐salafranca M, Bañuls J, Thomas L, et al. Dermoscopy of glomus tumour: a cross‐sectional study of 86 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(11):2016–2024. doi:10.1111/jdv.18432
  • Hamm H, Stolze I. Diseases of nails. In: Braun-Falco´ s Dermatology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2022:1373–1398.
  • Haneen A, Osman GMA, Ibraheam A. Extra digital glomus tumor: a rare cause for undiagnosed chronic pain in unusual sites. Plas Surg Case Stud. 2019;5:2513826X19828796.
  • Poornima K, Sigamani K, Harke AB. Clinicopathological study of glomus tumors in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Dermatol. 2022;67.4:480.
  • Sbai MA, Benzarti S, Gharbi W, et al. Glomus tumor of the leg: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31(1). doi:10.11604/pamj.2018.31.186.9706
  • Xiao A, Ahlers M, Dry SM, et al. Rare malignant glomus tumor of the esophagus with pulmonary metastasis: a case report. AME Case Rep. 2022;2022:6.
  • Sbaraglia M, Businello G, Bellan E, et al. Mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Pathologica. 2021;113.3:230. doi:10.32074/1591-951X-309
  • Grover C, Jayasree P, Kaliyadan F. Clinical and onychoscopic characteristics of subungual glomus tumor: a cross‐sectional study. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:693–702. doi:10.1111/ijd.15358
  • Xie Y, Zhang F, Lineaweaver WC, et al. Risk factors associated with misdiagnosis of digital glomus tumor: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2022;89(4):376–379. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003263
  • Guedes GVC, Jácome DT, Alves GF, et al. Epidemiological analysis of glomus tumors of the hand and association with recurrence rate. Revista Iberoam De Cirugía De la Mano. 2022;50(01):e27–e33. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1744466
  • Irojah B, Mullner DL, Moores C, et al. Tumors. Tip Trick Plast Surg. 2022;2022:763–780.
  • Falcone M-O, Asmar G, Chassat R. Subungual Glomus Tumor. Hand Surg Rehabilit. 2023;101607. doi:10.1016/j.hansur.2023.10.001
  • Kim YJ, Kim DH, Park JS, et al. Factors affecting surgical outcomes of digital glomus tumour: a multicentre study. J Hand Surg Europ Vol. 2018;43(6):652–658. doi:10.1177/1753193418774176
  • Faruquee SR, Kumar Saha M. Glomus tumour excision by nail sparing. J Bangl Orthop Soc. 2016; 31(2): 146–149.
  • Gong JH, Mehrzad R, Bhatt RA. Practical management of lumps and bumps of the fingers, hand, and wrist. J Am Board Family Med. 2022;35(6):1194–1203. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2022.220028R2
  • Causeret A, Lapègue F, Bruneau B, et al. Painful traumatic neuromas in subcutaneous fat: visibility and morphologic features with ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(9):2457–2467. doi:10.1002/jum.14944
  • Rutkowski P, Wysocki PJ, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, et al. Cutaneous melanoma. Oncol Clin Pract. 2020;16(4):163–182. doi:10.5603/OCP.2020.0021
  • Gharbi A, Abayed A, Abid L, et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the forearm muscles: three case reports and literature review. J Orthop Case Rep. 2023;13(10):157. doi:10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i10.3974
  • Andrade FAL, Cadena Arteaga JA, Echeverry Morillo VL, et al. Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome: presentation of a case and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16(8):2003–2006. doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2021.04.086
  • Akyurek M, Hafiz G. Retrospective analysis of clinical findings and radiologic diagnostic methods of subungual glomus tumor: a single-center study. Eur J Plastic Surg. 2023;46(6):1247–1253. doi:10.1007/s00238-023-02123-8
  • Lee WQ, Yihan L, Eng Meng Yeo N. Glomus tumour: an institutional experience of 31 cases. J Orthopaedic Surg Res. 2023;18.1:741. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-04234-1
  • Pansa A, Samà L, Ruspi L, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach: a systematic review and illustrative case report. Dig Dis. 2023;41(1):17–33. doi:10.1159/000525513
  • Rahbari K, Farzan M, Saffar H, et al. Glomus tumor of uncertain malignant potential in thumb: a case report and review of literature. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2020;8(1):117. doi:10.22038/abjs.2019.35225.1928
  • Ardeleanu V, Jecan CR, Tatu AL, et al. A recurrent solitary glomus tumor of the forearm. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2019;60:1019–1023.
  • Bordianu A, Zamfirescu D. The hidden cause of chronic finger pain: glomus tumor–a case report. J Med Life. 2019;12(1):30. doi:10.25122/jml-2018-0060
  • Rashid T, Altaf J, Husain M, et al. Glomus tumor in two non-adjacent finger tips of the same hand: a case report with literature review. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2021;5(8):30.
  • Saba M, Moser A, Rosenberg J, et al. Rare glomus tumor formation following trauma to the first digit. Internat J Surg Case Rep. 2021;86:106324. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106324
  • Kumar S, Tiwary S, More R, et al. Digital glomus tumor: an experience of 57 cases over 20 years. J Fam Med Prim Car. 2020;9(7):3514. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_446_20
  • Hatan M, AlRabah R, Kattan AE. Unusual location of pulp glomus tumor: a case study and literature review. Plastic Reconst Surg Global Open. 2022;10:3.
  • Patel J, Vaish A, Vaishya R, et al. Reappearance of a glomus tumor of the finger after nine years-A rare case report and literature review. J Orthop Rep. 2022;1(1):38–41. doi:10.1016/j.jorep.2022.03.014
  • Rahman M, Akhter N, Iqbal A, et al. Glomus tumor of finger pulp-A Case Report. J Bangl Coll Physic Surg. 2022;40:4.
  • Dhingra M, Niraula B, Regmi A, et al. Glomus tumour of hand––A commonly misdiagnosed pathology: a case series. J West Af Coll Surg. 2022;12(4):39. doi:10.4103/jwas.jwas_171_22
  • Prashant K, Ariwala D, Mohanty SS. The glomus tumor of finger–a case series. J Orthop Case Rep. 2023;13(3):17. doi:10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i03.3568
  • Abidin MA, Kitta MI, Nong I, et al. ”Diagnosis and surgical approach in treating glomus tumor distal phalanx left middle finger: a case report. Internat J Surg Case Rep;2023. 108426. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108426
  • Cohen PR. Glomus extradigital tumor: a case report of an extradigital glomus tumor on the wrist and comprehensive review of glomus tumors. Cureus. 2023;15:5.
  • Santoshi JA, Kumar Kori V, Khurana U. Glomus tumor of the fingertips: a frequently missed diagnosis. J Fam Med Prim Car. 2019;8(3):904. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_88_19
  • Saaiq M. Presentation and management outcome of glomus tumors of the hand. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2021;9(3):312. doi:10.22038/abjs.2020.47878.2367
  • Perţea M, Poroch V, Velenciuc N, et al. Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical features of glomus tumor of the nail bed. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021;62:233. doi:10.47162/RJME.62.1.23
  • Nikhil CS, Davis J, Muraleedharan K, et al. Glomus tumor: a case series study of 30 cases and review of the literature. J Orthop Assoc South Indian Stat. 2022;19(1):39–43. doi:10.4103/joasis.joasis_37_21
  • Hernández V, Lena T, Camacho E, et al. Digital glomus tumor: bibliographic review of the studies published over the past 10 years. Revista Iberoam De Cirugía De la Mano. 2021;49.01:046–055.
  • Mohamed WT, Jahagirdar V, Jaber F, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report. J Investig Med High Imp Case Rep. 2023;11:23247096231192891. doi:10.1177/23247096231192891
  • Reinders EFH, Klaassen KMG, Pasch MC. Transungual excision of glomus tumors: a treatment and quality of life study. Dermatologic Surg. 2020;46(1):103–112. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002006
  • Obeid AE, Al-Nasheet H, Alsharakat AH, Yousif W, Alhassan MA. Clinical and Histopathological diagnosis of glomus tumor: a 6 year institutional retrospective study. Int J Orthopaed Sci. 2020;6:285–288. doi:10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i4e.2352
  • Wang Y, Xiang Y, Bian Y, et al. Glomus tumors associated with the bone and joints: a review of 91 cases. Ann Translat Med. 2020;8(21):1460. doi:10.21037/atm-20-6998
  • Singal A, Bisherwal K, Agrawal S, et al. Clinico-epidemiological profile and management outcome of subungual digital glomus tumor—Indian experience. Dermatologic Therapy. 2022;35(10):e15745. doi:10.1111/dth.15745
  • Sun Y, Qi R, Wu Z, et al. The clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 60 cutaneous glomus tumor: a retrospective case series study. Anais Brasil De Dermatol. 2023;99:238–243. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2023.03.005
  • Nthumba PM, Naguria Oundoh L. Glomus tumors: a systematic review of the sub-saharan Africa experience. Plast Reconst Surg. 2024;12:e5564. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000005564
  • Bargon CA, Mohamadi A, Talaei-Khoei M, et al. Factors associated with requesting magnetic resonance imaging during the management of glomus tumors. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2019;7(5):422.
  • Patel T, Meena V, Meena P. Hand and foot glomus tumors: significance of MRI diagnosis followed by histopathological assessment. Cureus. 2022;14:10.
  • Chen L, Nikolić N, Mildner M, et al. Diagnosis of subungual glomus tumors with 18 MHz ultrasound and CDFI. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–6. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4
  • de Almeida CA. High-frequency ultrasonography for subungual glomus tumor evaluation–imaging findings. Skell Radiol. 2023;2023:1–8.
  • Kim YB, Choi IC, Park JH, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography is a more useful primary diagnostic tool than magnetic resonance imaging for subungual glomus tumors: a single-center retrospective study. Arch Hand Microsurg. 2023;28(1):33–38. doi:10.12790/ahm.22.0060
  • Lim P, Yue B, Cavallo A. Surgical treatment of benign subungual tumours—a systematic review and case series. Austral J Plast Surg. 2023;6:1–8.
  • Pertea M, Grosu OM, Filip A, et al. Rare benign tumors and tumor-like lesions of the hand without skin damage—clinical, imagistic and histopathological diagnosis, retrospective study. Diagnostics. 2023;13(6):1204. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13061204