Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 22, 2010 - Issue 7
80
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Changes in biologic and/or immunologic parameters induced by intratracheal instillation of pregnant mice with benzo(α)pyrene are potentially confounded by anesthesia

, , &
Pages 571-579 | Received 03 Sep 2009, Accepted 04 Jan 2010, Published online: 13 Apr 2010
 

Abstract

Benzo(α)pyrene (B(α)P) is a potent multiorgan carcinogen released into the atmosphere from commercial, domestic, and industrial sources. Studies using animal models have shown that giving B(α)P parenterally to pregnant animals (i.e., dams) led to increased tumor frequency and sensitivity to tumorigenesis in their progeny. The authors’ studies also showed that the progeny of the B(α)P-exposed dams displayed increased deficiencies in cell-mediated and humoral immune functions, changes among T-cell subsets in developing lymphoid tissues, and significant expression of B(α)P-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE)-DNA adducts in thymic, splenic, and (fetal) liver tissues. The authors evaluated whether similar biologic/immunologic effects of B(α)P seen earlier in parenterally exposed mouse dams (and offspring) occurred if dams were exposed to B(α)P via the lungs. Pregnant dams were subjected to intratracheal instillation of B(α)P (at 1 mg/ml corn oil, 0.1 ml/instillate) beginning on day 11 of pregnancy (GD 11) and again on GDs 12 and 14. In each case, the dams were anesthetized with metofane. Other dams were left untreated (controls), anesthetized only, or anesthetized and then instilled with vehicle. Effects of the B(α)P exposures included lower dam body weights during gestation, decreased postbirth pup survival, increased pup tumor frequency, and decreased mixed-lymphocyte responses by pup lymphocytes. These studies also revealed that metofane imparted effects on the dams and progeny. These effects equaled the B(α)P treatments alone; in other instances, the metofane had no impact, and thus questions the observed biologic/immunologic effects of B(α)P induced in pregnant mice (and their progeny), which might have been confounded by use of this (or potentially other) anesthesia.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Nicole Mashburn for computer and editorial assistance.

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by funds from The United States Environmental Protection Agency (grant R815813) and by funds provided by The United States Agency for International Development (grant PCE-5053-G-00-3062). The authors are alone responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 389.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.