Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 22, 2010 - Issue 14
233
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analysis of the concentration–respiratory response among asthmatics following controlled short-term exposures to sulfur dioxide

, &
Pages 1184-1193 | Received 21 Sep 2010, Accepted 24 Oct 2010, Published online: 02 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Some of the most compelling evidence of sulfur dioxide (SO2)-induced respiratory morbidity is derived from a large body of studies involving controlled short-term exposures among groups of asthmatic volunteers. These studies were extensively cited in the recently completed review of the primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for SO2. Although it is clear from these investigations that exposure to SO2 may result in a significant increase in bronchoconstriction, there is uncertainty regarding the range of concentrations over which this respiratory response occurs. The objective of this study was to better characterize the concentration–response relationship between SO2 and measures of bronchoconstriction using individual subject lung function response data. In reviewing studies of asthmatics exposed to SO2 during 5- to 10-min periods of elevated ventilation, we observed clear and consistent evidence of an increase in the bronchoconstrictive response to SO2 with increasing exposure concentrations between 0.2 and 1.0 ppm. In a subsequent analysis of individual subject data, it was found that those asthmatics experiencing SO2-induced respiratory effects at relatively high exposure concentrations are also more likely than nonresponders to experience similar effects after exposure to lower SO2 concentrations (≤0.4 ppm). Although the clinical significance of these effects is unsettled, the findings provide additional support to epidemiologic evidence of an association between ambient SO2 concentration and various measures of respiratory morbidity in the general population.

Notice of correction: Due to a production error, the initial version of this article published online ahead of print contained a number of typographic errors which have been corrected in the current version.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 389.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.