Exploring the asymmetric cost behaviour in the context of European non-listed firms

References

• Anderson, M. A., R. D. Banker, and S. Janakiraman. 2003. “Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?” Journal of Accounting Research 41 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. W., and W. N. Lanen 2009. “Understanding Cost Management: What Can We Learn from the Empirical Evidence on “Sticky costs”?” Working paper, University of Michigan 10.2139/ssrn.975135
   Google Scholar
• Argilés-Bosch, J. M., J. Garcia-Blandón, and D. Ravenda. 2022a. “Cost Behavior in E-Commerce Firms.” Electronic Commerce Research. doi:10.1007/s10660-021-09528-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argilés-Bosch, J. M., J. Garcia-Blandón, and D. Ravenda. 2022b. “Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Labour Cost Stickiness and Labour Reforms in Spain.” Accounting and Finance 63 (S1): 1–35. doi:10.1111/acfi.12991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., and T. S. Gruca. 2008. “Cost Stickiness and Core Competency: A Note.” Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (4): 993–1006. doi:10.1506/car.25.4.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., E. Labro, and N. S. Soderstrom. 2014. “Cost Structure and Sticky Costs.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 26 (2): 91–116. doi:10.2308/jmar-50831.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., M. J. Peterson, and N. Soderstrom. 2004. “Does Capacity Utilization Affect the “Stickiness” of Costs?” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 19 (3): 283–299. doi:10.1177/0148558X0401900303.
   Google Scholar
• Balios, D., N. Eriotis, V. C. Naoum, and D. Vasiliou. 2021. “How Earnings Management Drive the Sticky Behavior of Selling General and Administrative Costs; an International Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting 12 (3/4): 242–264. doi:10.1504/IJMFA.2020.112336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballas, A., V. C. Naoum, and O. Vlismas. 2022. “The Effect of Strategy on Asymmetric Cost Behavior of SG&A Expenses.” European Accounting Review 31 (2): 409–447. doi:10.1080/09638180.2020.1813601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, D., and D. Byzalov. 2014. “Asymmetric Cost Behavior.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 25 (2): 43–79. doi:10.2308/jmar-50846.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and J. M. Plehn-Dujowich. 2014. “Demand Uncertainty and Cost Behavior.” The Accounting Review 89 (3): 839–865. doi:10.2308/accr-50661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., R. Flasher, and D. Zhang 2013. “Strategic Positioning and Asymmetric Cost Behavior.” Working paper, Temple University. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2312852
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., and M. Becht. 2001. The Control of Corporate Europe. Oxford: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Boeker, W., and R. Karichalil. 2002. “Entrepreneurial Transitions: Factors Influencing Founder Departure.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (4): 818–826. doi:10.5465/3069314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calleja, K. M., M. Steliaros, and D. Thomas. 2006. “A Note on Cost Stickiness: Some International Comparisons.” Management Accounting Research 17 (2): 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Cassar, G., and S. Holmes. 2003. “Capital Structure and Financing of SMEs: Australian Evidence.” Accounting and Finance 43 (2): 123–147. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.t01-1-00085.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, S., W. Jiang, and Y. Zeng. 2018. “Does Access to Capital Affect Cost Stickiness? Evidence from China.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 25: 177–198. doi:10.1080/16081625.2016.1253483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. “The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs.” Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (1): 252–282. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., S. Karatzimas, and V. C. Naoum. 2017. “The Sticky Cost Phenomenon at the Local Government Level: Empirical Evidence from Greece.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 18 (4): 445–463. doi:10.1108/JAAR-03-2015-0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosh, A. D., and A. Hughes. 1994. “Size, Financial Structure and Profitability: UK Companies in the 1980s.” In Finance and the Small Firm, edited by A. Hughes and D. Storey. London: Routledge. doi:10.2307/2950485.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla, V. N., P. Perego, and S. Cahan. 2013. “Sticky Cost Behaviour: Evidence from Small and Medium Sized Companies.” Accounting & Finance 54 (3): 753–778. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Medeiros, O. R., and P. de Souza Costa 2004. “Cost Stickiness in Brazilian Firms.” Working paper (University of Brasılia, Brasılia, Brazil). 10.2139/ssrn.632365
   Google Scholar
• Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders. 2012. “Do Managerial Incentives Drive Cost Behavior? Evidence About the Role of the Zero Earnings Benchmark for Labor Cost Behavior in Belgian Private Firms.” The Accounting Review 87 (4): 1219–1246. doi:10.2308/accr-50153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2008. “The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing.” Journal of Financial Economics 88 (3): 430–465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haga, J., H. Höglund, and D. Sundvik. 2019. “Cost Behavior Around Corporate Tax Rate Cuts.” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 34: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlieb, S., T. R. Loy, and B. Eierle. 2020. “Does Community Social Capital Affect Asymmetric Cost Behaviour?.” Management Accounting Research 46: 01–15. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2019.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D., J. Teruya, and T. Shimizu. 2010. “Sticky Selling, General, and Administrative Cost Behavior and Its Changes in Japan.” Global Journal of Business Research 4 (4): 1–10. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1871276.
   Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, M., R. Krishnan, and M. D. Mahlendorf. 2015. “The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior.” Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (2): 534–566. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kama, I., and D. Weiss. 2013. “Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs?” Journal of Accounting Research 51 (1): 201–224. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitching, K., R. Mashruwala, and M. Pevzner. 2016. “Culture and Cost Stickiness: A Cross-Country Study.” The International Journal of Accounting 51 (3): 402–417. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2016.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1997. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” The Journal of Finance 52 (3): 1131–1150. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., S. Radhakrishnan, and W. Zhang. 2009. “Organization Capital.” Abacus 45 (3): 275–298. 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G., and J. Piotroski. (2000). “The Role of Disclosure for High Book-To-Market Firms.” Working paper, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Noreen, E. 1991. “Conditions Under Which Activity-Based Cost Systems Provide Relevant Costs.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 3 (Fall): 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Otley, D. 1994. “Management Control in Contemporary Organizations: Towards a Wider Framework.” Management Accounting Research 5 (3/4): 289–299. doi:10.1006/mare.1994.1018.
   Google Scholar
• Özkaya, H. 2020. “Sticky Cost Behavior: Evidence from Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Turkey.” Eurasian Business Review 11: 349–369. doi:10.1007/s40821-020-00156-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasanen, M. 2007. “SME Growth Strategies: Organic or Non-Organic?” Journal of Enterprising Culture 15 (4): 317–338. doi:10.1142/S0218495807000174.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, T., and S. Thomsen. 2003. “Ownership Structure and Value of the Largest European Firms: The Importance of Owner Identity.” Journal of Management & Governance 7 (1): 27–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022480016567.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. A. 2009. “Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” The Review of Financial Studies 22 (1): 435–480. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabowo, R., R. Hooghiemstra, and P. Van Veen-Dirks. 2018. “State Ownership, Socio-Political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness.” European Accounting Review 27 (4): 771–796. doi:10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepasi, S., and H. Hassani. 2015. “Study of the Effect of the Firm Size on Costs Stickiness: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange.” International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research 13 (6): 4143–4159.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, S., and T. Pedersen. 2000. “Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies.” Strategic Management Journal 21 (6): 689–705. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200006)21:6<689:AID-SMJ115>3.0.CO;2-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, S., and R. Wessels. 1988. “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.” The Journal of Finance 43 (1): 1–19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venieris, G., V. C. Naoum, and O. Vlismas. 2015. “Organisation Capital and Sticky Behavior of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.” Management Accounting Research 26 (1): 54–82. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2014.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von, K. G., and M. A. Cusumano. 2001. “Three Strategies for Managing Fast Growth.” MIT Sloan Management Review 42 (2): 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, J. K. 1999. “How Firm Characteristics Affect Capital Structure: An International Comparison.” Journal of Financial Research 22 (2): 161–187. doi:10.1111/J.1475-6803.1999.TB00721.X.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, N. 2003. “Founder-CEO Succession and the Paradox of Entrepreneurial Success.” Organization Science 14 (2): 149–172. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.149.14995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T. C., C. -S. Young, C. -C. Yu, and H. -T. Hsu. 2020. “Are Governmental Expenditures Also Sticky? Evidence from the Operating Expenditures of Public Schools.” Applied Economics 52 (16): 1763–1776. doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1678731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and J. Sim. 2017. “Are Costs Really Sticky and Biased? Evidence from Manufacturing Listed Companies in China.” Applied Economics 49 (55): 5601–5613. doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1316823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanella, F., P. Oyelere, and S. Hossain. 2015. “Are Costs Really Sticky? Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies in the UAE.” Applied Economics 47 (60): 6519–6528. doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1080807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar