A study to depict challenges and opportunities building industry professionals face when designing inclusive and accessible buildings

References

• American Standards Association, National Society for Crippled Children, & United States. President's Committee on Employment of the Physically Handicapped. 1980. American Standard Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible To, and Usable By, the Physically Handicapped. California Department of Rehabilitation.
   Google Scholar
• Ayhan, H. Öztaş. 2011. “Non-probability Sampling Survey Methods.” In In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, edited by Miodrag Lovric, 979–982. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, D., and R. Heale. 2020. “What are Delphi Studies?” Evidence Based Nursing 23 (3): 68–69. http://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basnak, M. B., B. Tauke, and S. Weidemann. 2015. “Universal Design in Architectural Education: Who is Doing It? How is it Being Done?” Proceedings of the Future of Architectural Research: The Architectural Research Centers Consortium (ARCC), Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bichard, Jo-Anne, and Rama Gheerawo. 2013. “Inclusive Design.” The Design Journal 16 (2): 133–137. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630613X13584367984785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI. 2005. BS 7000-6:2005 - Design Management Systems. Part 6. London: Managing Inclusive Design Guide.
   Google Scholar
• BSRIA. 2015. “Soft Landings.”  
   Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, Evangelia. 2018. “Why we Need new Architectural and Design Paradigms to Meet the Needs of Vulnerable People.” Palgrave Communications 4 (1), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0171-z.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. J., and R. Coleman. 2015. “History of Inclusive Design in the UK.” Applied Ergonomics 46 (Pt B): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Roger. 1994. “The Case for Inclusive Design an Overview.” Paper Presented at the 12th Triennial Congress. International Ergonomics Association and the Human Factors Association of Canada, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, Ryan, Katja Fleischmann, and Riccardo Welters. 2017. “Professional Development in the Creative Industries: Methods and Insights from Regional Practitioners.” Australian Journal of Career Development 26 (3): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416217720780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durosaiye, Isaiah Oluremi, Karim Hadjri, and Champika Lasanthi Liyanage. 2019. “A Critique of Post-Occupancy Evaluation in the UK.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 34 (1): 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09646-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaden, J., M. K. Mayberry, and J. F. Mayberry. 1999. “Questionnaires: The use and Abuse of Social Survey Methods in Medical Research.” Postgraduate Medical Journal 75 (885): 397–400. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.75.885.397.
   Google Scholar
• EIDD. 2020. Design for All Europe: Stockholm Declaration. Accessed November 12, 2020. https://www.designforalleurope.org.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C., M. Zallio, D. Berry, and J. McGrory. 2021. “Towards a People-First Engineering Design Approach. A Comprehensive Ontology for Designing Inclusive Environments.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-20 August 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.579.
   Google Scholar
• Følstad, Asbjørn, and Knut Kvale. 2018. “Customer Journeys: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Service Theory and Practice 28 (2): 196–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-11-2014-0261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, Nikolaus, and Frank Piller. 2004. “Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 21 (6): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, David A. 1994. “Heroes and Misfits: The Troubled Social Reintegration of Disabled Veterans in "The Best Years of Our Lives".” American Quarterly 46 (4): 545–574. https://doi.org/10.2307/2713383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S. 1963. Designing for the Disabled: A Manual of Technical Information”.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, Selwyn. 2000. Universal Design: A Manual of Practical Guidance for Architects. Edited by Selwyn Goldsmith. London: Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Lindsay T., Thomas Parkinson, and Stefano Schiavon. 2021. “Lessons Learned from 20 Years of CBE’s Occupant Surveys.” Buildings and Cities 2 (1): 166–184. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.76.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. B., M. Gould, and J. E. Bickenbach. 2003. “Environmental Barriers and Disability.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 20 (1): 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, Peter P., Madelon Kroneman, and Peter Spreeuwenberg. 2021. “Physical Accessibility of Primary Care Facilities for People with Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Survey in 31 Countries.” BMC Health Services Research 21 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06120-0.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Rebecca, and Linda L. Price. 2019. “Consumer Journeys: Developing Consumer-Based Strategy.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47 (2): 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00636-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, Ahmad Ezanee, Siti Aida Samikon, Faridah Ismail, Hikmah Kamarudin, Md Nadzri Mohd Jalil, and Norrimah Mad Arrif. 2012. “Access and Accessibility Audit in Commercial Complex: Effectiveness in Respect to People with Disabilities (PWDs).” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.049.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Rowena, Flora Samuel, Kelly J. Watson, and Simon Bradbury. 2018. “Post-occupancy Evaluation in Architecture: Experiences and Perspectives from UK Practice.” Building Research & Information 46 (6): 698–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1314692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen, A., V. Van der Linden, and I. Van Steenwinkel. 2017. “Ten Questions Concerning Inclusive Design of the Built Environment.” Building and Environment 114: 507–517. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetler, Mark. 2010. “Beyond Design: The Importance of Construction and Post-Construction Phases in Green Developments.” Sustainability 2: 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2041128.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and P. Hall. 2001. Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institute, American National Standards. 1980. Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to Usable to Physically Handicapped People. Edited by President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped. National Easter Seal Society. United States of America. 2nd ed. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hae-Young. 2017. “Statistical Notes for Clinical Researchers: Chi-Squared Test and Fisher's Exact Test.” Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 42 (2): 152–155. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuitert, Lizet, Leentje Volker, and Marleen H. Hermans. 2019. “Taking on a Wider View: Public Value Interests of Construction Clients in a Changing Construction Industry.” Construction Management and Economics 37 (5): 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1515496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifchez, Raymond, and Barbara. Winslow. 1979. Design for Independent Living: The Environment for Physically Disabled People. New York: Whitney Library of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, R. L., G. J. Hardie, and J. P. Place. 1991. “Accessible Environments:Toward Universal Design.” In In Design Intervention: Toward a More Humane Architecture, edited by J. C. Vischer, W. E. Preiser, and E. T. White, 67–71. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Mari, M., and P. Poggesi. 2014. “Facility Management: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.” International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business (3/4): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2014.067506
   Google Scholar
• Marín-Nicolás, José, and Mª Paz Sáez-Pérez. 2022. “An Evaluation Tool for Physical Accessibility of Cultural Heritage Buildings.” Sustainability 14 (22): 15251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215251.
   Google Scholar
• Nations, United. 2008. “International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities.” In Series M No.4/Rev.4, 29–32. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, Cleo, and Irene Williams. 2011. “Grey Literature: Its Emerging Importance.” Journal of Hospital Librarianship 11 (3): 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2011.587100.
   Google Scholar
• Persad, U., P. Langdon, D. Brown, and P. J. Clarkson. 2007. “Cognitive Scales and Mental Models for Inclusive Design.” In Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity. UAHCI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by C. Stephanidis. vol. 4554, 235–239. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pirkl, J. J., and A. L. Babic. 1988. Guidelines and Strategies for Designing Transgenerational Products: A Resource Manual for Industrial Design Professionals. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ponto, J. 2015. “Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research.” Journal of Advanced Practitioner in Oncology 6 (2): 168–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryhl, C. 2014. “The Missing Link in Implementation of Universal Design: The Barrier Between Legislative Framework and Architectural Practice.” In Three Days of Creativity and Diversity. Vol. 35, edited by H. A. Caltenco, A. Larsson, P.-O. Hedvall, K. Rassmus-Gröhn, and B. Rydeman, 433–434. IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelings, ClÈmentine, and C. Elsen. 2017. “A Method for Architectural Inclusive Design: The Case of Users Experiencing Down Syndrome.” Advances in Life Sciences 9: 201.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. N., J. S. Hornsby, P. G. Benson, and M. Wesolowski. 1989, Spring. “What Is in a Name: The Impact of Job Titles on Job Evaluation Results.” Journal of Business and Psychology Vol. 3 (No. 3): 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023051.
   Google Scholar
• Tofan, D., M. Galster, and P. Avgeriou. 2013. “Difficulty of Architectural Decisions. A Survey with Professional Architects.” Paper Presented at the ECSA 2013, LNCS 7957.
   Google Scholar
• Usable Buildings Trust. 2021. BUS Methodology. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://busmethodology.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, V., H. Dong, and A. Heylighen. 2016. “From Accessibility to Experience: Opportunities for Inclusive Design in Architectural Practice.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 28 (2): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, J., and R. Moser. 2016. “Biases in Future-Oriented Delphi Studies: A Cognitive Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 105: 63–76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zallio, M., and P. J. Clarkson. 2021a. “Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility in the Built Environment: A Study of Architectural Design Practice.” Building and Environment 206: 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352.
   Google Scholar
• Zallio, M., and P. J. Clarkson. 2021b. “On Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility in Civil Engineering and Architectural Design. A Review of Assessment Tools.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21). Gothenburg, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.491
   Google Scholar
• Zallio, M., and P.J. Clarkson. 2022a. “The Inclusive Design Canvas. A Strategic Design Template for Architectural Design Professionals.” In Proceedings of the Design Society 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Zallio, M., and P. J. Clarkson. 2022b. “The Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility Audit. A Post-Occupancy Evaluation Method to Help Design the Buildings of Tomorrow.” Building and Environment 217: 109058.
   Google Scholar