Managing and mapping the history of collecting indigenous human remainsFootnote^*

* This paper has been double-blind peer reviewed to meet the Department of Higher Education’s Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC) requirements.

References

• Anderson, W. (2002). The cultivation of whiteness: Science, health and racial destiny in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1876, September 23). The Trinity Bay country. The Brisbane Courier, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1887, May 28). Personals. Queensland Figaro and Punch, p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1974a, March 19). Reburial wanted. Canberra Times, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1974b, April 1). Truganini burial unlikely. Canberra Times, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1974c, June 6). Truganini action. Canberra Times, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, E. (1993). The retreat of scientific racism: Changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States between the world wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. J. A. (1909). Preliminary account of the discovery of forty-two hitherto unrecorded Tasmania crania. Anatomischer Anzeiger, 35, 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. J. A. (1912a). A biometrical study of the relative degree of purity of race of the Tasmanian, Australian, and Papuan. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 31, 17–40.10.1017/S0370164600024998
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. J. A. (1912b). The place in nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as deduced from a study of his calvarium. Part I. His relations to the Anthropoid Apes, Pithecanthropus, Homo primigenius, Homo fossilis, and Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 31, 41–69.10.1017/S0370164600025001
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. J. A. (1914). The place in nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as deduced from a study of his calvaria. Part II: His relation to the Australian Aboriginal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 34, 144–189.10.1017/S037016460001333X
   Google Scholar
• Condon, H. H. (1979). Atkinson, Henry Brune (1874–1960). In B. Nairn (Ed.), Australian dictionary of biography (Vol. 7, pp. 120–121). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council. (1876). Special meeting of council 11 July 1876. Archives of the Royal Society of Tasmania, RSA/A/4, f. 379; f. 432. Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, D. (1995). The assertion of Tasmanian aboriginality from the 1967 Referendum to Mabo (Unpublished masters thesis). Hobart: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., & Galloway, K. (2008). The story of seventeen Tasmanians: The Tasmanian Aboriginal centre and repatriation from the Natural History Museum. New Law Review, 11, 143–165.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) International Repatriation Program. (2010). Discussion paper on a review of the International Repatriation Program. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, V. R. (1981). Trucanini: Queen or traitor? Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fabian, A. (2010). The skull collectors. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226233499.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fforde, C. (2004). Collecting the dead: Archaeology and the reburial Issue. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Fforde, C., Ormond-Parker, L., & Turnbull, P. (2015). Repatriation research: Archives and the recovery of history and heritage. In R. R. Cooper (Ed.), Heritage, ancestry and law: Principles, policies and practices in dealing with historical human remains (pp. 39–59). Wells: Institute of Art and Law.
   Google Scholar
• Hanchant, D. (2002). Practicalities in the return of remains: The importance of provenance and the question of unprovenanced remains. In C. Fforde, J. Hubert, & P. Turnbull (Eds.), The dead and their possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy and practice (pp. 312–316). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klaatsch, H. (1904). Tagebuch 3, 1904/III, S. 48-49, Private collection.
   Google Scholar
• Lahn, J. (2007). Finders keepers, losers weepers: A social history of the Kow Swamp remains. In L. Smith (Ed.), Cultural heritage: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies, Volume 1, History and concepts (pp. 361–410). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. (2005). Human remains: Episodes in human dissection. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G. J. (2011). Mapping the past: Building public knowledge places to meet community needs. Circumscribere, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvaney, D. J., & Calaby, J. H. (1985). ‘So much that is new’. Baldwin Spencer: A biography. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pardoe, C. (1991). Eye of the storm. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 2, 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. (2011). Dance through the minefield: The development of practical ethics for repatriation. In J. Marstine (Ed.), Routledge companion to museum ethics (pp. 256–274). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plomley, N. J. B. (1962). A list of Tasmanian Aboriginal material in collections in Europe. Launceston: Museum Committee, Launceston City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Roque, R. (2010). Headhunting and colonialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1057/9780230251335
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. (1981). The Aboriginal Tasmanians. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P. (1999). Enlightenment anthropology and the ancestral remains of Australian Aboriginal people. In A. Calder, J. Lamb & B. Orr (Eds.), Voyages and beaches: Pacific encounters, 1769–1840 (pp. 202–225). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P. (2002). Indigenous Australian people, their defence of the dead and native title. In C. Fforde, J. Hubert, & P. Turnbull (Eds.), The dead and their possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy and practice (pp. 63–86). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P. (2008). British anthropological thought in colonial practice, 1860–1880. In B. Douglas & C. Ballard (Eds.), Foreign bodies: Race in Oceania (pp. 205–228). Canberra: ANU E-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull P. (in press). Science, museums and the plundering of the indigenous dead in colonial Australia. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P., & Appel, M. (in press). A mummified body from Queensland in the Five Continents Museum. Journal Fünf Kontinente. Forum für ethnologische Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, W. (1911). The Aborigines of Tasmania. Part II. The skeleton. Transactions of the Royal Society of Victoria, 47, 411–454.
   Google Scholar
• de Vis, C. (1885). Inwards correspondence, Charles de Vis to Charles de Vis Senior, 2 February 1885. Brisbane: Queensland Museum Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Westlake, E. (n.d.). Papers, box 1, part 7. Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2007). Ngarrindjeri experiences of repatriation: Engaging in an effective consultation process for returning old people. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 6, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderly, J., & Wood-Jones, F. (1933). The non-metrical morphological characters of the Tasmanian skull. Journal of Anatomy, 67, 583–595.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar