Multisensory system for non-invasive monitoring and measuring of laboratory animal welfare

References

• Fox JG, Bennett BT. Chapter 1 - laboratory animal medicine: historical perspectives. In: JG Fox, LC Anderson, GM Otto, KR Pritchett-Corning, MT Whary, editor. Laboratory animal medicine (Third Edition), American college of laboratory animal medicine. Boston: Academic Press; 2015. p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Evans I, Thornton H, Chalmers I, et al. (2011). Testing treatments: Better research for better healthcare. Pinter and Martin, 2nd edition. Includes bibliographical references and index.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins M. Observing animal behaviour: design and analysis of quantitative data. Observing Anim Behav: Des Anal Quant Data. 2008;1:1–176.
   Google Scholar
• Reitman ML. Of mice and men – environmental temperature, body temperature, and treatment of obesity. FEBS Lett 2018;592(12):2098–2107. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone L. Re.: Russell and burch’s 3rs then and now. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015;54:351–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of European Union. (2010). Council regulation (EU) no 2010/63/eu. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/oj.
   Google Scholar
• van Vlissingen JF, Borrens M, Girod A, et al. The reporting of clinical signs in laboratory animals. Lab Anim 2015;49(4):267–283. PMID: 25957286. doi:10.1177/0023677215584249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bronstad A, Newcomer CE, Decelle T, et al. Current concepts of harm-benefit analysis of animal experiments - report from the aalasfelasa working group on harm-benefit analysis - part 1. Lab Anim 2016;50(1 suppl):1–20. PMID: 27188275. doi:10.1177/0023677216642398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruxton G. Observing animal behaviour: design and analysis of quantitative data, marian stamp dawkins. Anim Behav. 2008;75:1597–1598. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.003
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2002). Guidance document on the recognition, assessment and use of clinical signs as human endpoints for experimental animals used in safety evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Orellana-Muriana J. Oxford handbook of innovation, chapter animal models in cancer research: assessment of severity and the application of humane endpoints. animal models of brain tumors. In: Martínez Murillo R, Martínez A, editors. Neuromethods, vol 77. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bugnon P, Heimann M, Thallmair M. What the literature tells US about score sheet design. Lab Anim 2016;50(6):414–417. PMID: 27909190. doi:10.1177/0023677216671552
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith D, Anderson D, Degryse A-D, et al. Classification and reporting of severity experienced by animals used in scientific procedures: Felasa/eclam/eslav working group report. Lab Anim 2018;52(1 suppl):5–57. PMID: 29359995. doi:10.1177/0023677217744587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuker A, Arepally G, Crowther MA, et al. The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score: a novel pre-test probability model for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia based on broad expert opinion. J Thromb Haemostasis. 2010;8(12):2642–2650. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04059.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates H, Chamberlain B, Baldwin W, et al. Assessing animal emotion and behavior using mobile sensors and affective computing. In: P Mallick, S Borah, editors. Emerging trends and applications in cognitive computing. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global; 2017. p. 49–77.
   Google Scholar
• Voikar V, Gaburro S. Three pillars of automated home-cage phenotyping of mice: novel findings, refinement, and reproducibility based on literature and experience. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14:193, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2020.575434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottoni E. Etholog 2.2: a tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions. Behav Res Methods. 2000;32:446–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Zhang H, Klaminder J, et al. Toxid: an efficient algorithm to solve occlusions when tracking multiple animals. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14774–14782. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15104-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Zhang H, Klaminder J, et al. Toxtrac: a fast and robust software for tracking organisms. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9:460–464. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar P, Mendonca L, Galhardo V. Opencontrol: a free opensource software for video tracking and automated control of behavioral mazes. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;166(1):66–72. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer T, Constantinidis C. A software solution for the control of visual behavioral experimentation. J Neurosci Methods. 2005;142(1):27–34. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa T, Fyall A, Green J, et al. Refinement of the CNS-FOB method via the use of automated noldus EthoVision® XT 7.0 video-tracking system in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2011;64(1):e20–e21. Eighth Annual Focused Issue on Methods in Safety Pharmacology. doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2011.03.075
   Google Scholar
• Nath T, Mathis A, Chen AC, et al. Using deeplabcut for 3d markerless pose estimation across species and behaviors. bioRxiv. 2018;1.
   Google Scholar
• P´erez-Escudero A, Vicente-Page J, Hinz R, et al. Idtracker: tracking individuals in a group by automatic identification of unmarked animals. Nat Methods. 2014;11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar VH, Roche DG, Gingins S. Tracktor: image-based automated tracking of animal movement and behaviour. Methods Ecol Evol. 2019;10(6):815–820. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn T, Marshall J, Severson K. Geometric deep learning enables 3d kinematic profiling across species and environments. Nat Methods. 2021;18(5):564–573. doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01106-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Bermudez Contreras E, Nazari M, et al. Low-cost solution for rodent home-cage behaviour monitoring. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary J, O’Leary O, Cryan J, et al. A low-cost touchscreen operant chamber using a raspberry pi. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan LS. Animal health monitoring system using raspberry pi and wireless sensor. Int J Sci Res Educ. 2015;3.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari S, Yadav SK. Development of iot based smart animal health monitoring system using raspberry pi. Int J Adv Stud Sci Res. 2018;3.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Srinivasan R, Ganesan V. Ecodesign strategy for demand-oriented electrical and electronic products. Sustainability. 2021;13(1):24, doi:10.3390/su14010024
   Google Scholar
• Alarcón-Paredes A, Francisco-García V, Guzmán-Guzmán IP, et al. An iot-based non-invasive glucose level monitoring system using raspberry pi. Appl Sci. 2019;9(15.
   Google Scholar
• Antunes, A. M. S. (2019). Development of an ammonia portable low-cost air quality station. Master’s thesis, Universidade de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Systems J. (2023). Jaycon systems. Accessed on 03-01-2023.
   Google Scholar
• Hanwei Electronics CO L. (2023). Datasheet mq-137. Accessed on 03-01-2023.
   Google Scholar