Application of inverse gas chromatography to bench scale flotation of sulphide ore

References

• Marion C, Jordens A, Maloney C, et al. Effect of microwave radiation on the processing of a Cu-Ni sulphide ore. Can J Chem Eng. 2016;94(1):117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley A, Woods R. Surface composition of pentlandite under flotation-related conditions. Surf Interface Anal. 1991;17(9):675–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills BA, Finch JA. Wills’ mineral processing technology: An introduction to the practical aspects of Ore treatment and mineral recovery. 8th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch A. The behaviour of minerals in sulphide flotation processes, with reference to simulation and control. J S Afr Inst Min Metall. 1974;74:349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Chehreh] Chelgani S, Hart B. TOF-SIMS studies of surface chemistry of minerals subjected to flotation separation – A review. Miner Eng. 2014;57:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett T, Cattalani S, MacLean W. Volcanic lithogeochemistry and alteration at the delbridge massive sulfide deposit, noranda, Quebec. J Geochem Explor. 1993;48(2):135–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J, Khalek NA, Basilio C, et al. Flotation chemistry and technology of nonsulfide minerals. In: Fuerstenau M, Jameson G, RH Yoon, editor. Froth flotation: a century of innovation. New York: SME; 2007. p. 465–466.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter H, Seifert F. Mineralogy and genesis of cordierite-anthophyllite rocks from the sulfide deposit of Falun, Sweden. Lithos. 1984;17:147–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison IR. Geology of the Izok massive sulfide deposit, Nunavut Territory, Canada. Explor Min Geol. 2004;13(1-4):25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Prestidge C, Ralston J. Contact angle studies of particulate sulphide minerals. Miner Eng. 1996;9(1):85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart RS, Amarantidis J, Skinner WM, et al. Surface analytical studies of oxidation and collector adsorption in sulfide mineral flotation. Scanning Microsc 1998;12(4):553–583.
   Google Scholar
• [Brito] e Abreu S, Skinner W. ToF-SIMS-derived hydrophobicity in DTP flotation of chalcopyrite: contact angle distributions in flotation streams. Int J Miner Process. 2011;98(1):35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes R, Price D, Ralston J, et al. Collectorless flotation of sulphide minerals. Mineral Process Extract Metall Rev. 1987;2(3):203–234.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi-Jam S, Waters K. Inverse gas chromatography applications: A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;212:21–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SS, Heng JY, Nikolaev A, et al. Introducing inverse gas chromatography as a method of determining the surface heterogeneity of minerals for flotation. Powder Technol. 2013;249:373–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph M, Chelgani SC, Meier K, Hartmann R. The energy of interactions between bubbles and particles–specific surface free energy distributions and microflotation. The 7th International Flotation Conference (Flotation ‘15); Cape Town, South Africa. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chatelier RC, Drummond CJ, Chan DYC, et al. Theory of contact angles and the free energy of formation of ionizable surfaces: application to heptylamine radio-frequency plasma-deposited films. Langmuir. 1995;11(10):4122–4128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi-Jam S, Burnett D, Waters K. Surface energy of minerals–applications to flotation. Miner Eng. 2014(66-68):112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi-Jam S, Waters K. Inverse gas chromatography analysis of minerals: pyrite wettability. Miner Eng. 2016(96-97):130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Napier-Munn T. Statistical methods to compare batch flotation grade-recovery curves and rate constants. Miner Eng. 2012;34:70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera M, Franzidis J, Manlapig E, editors. The locus of flotation performance. Proceedings of the XXI International Mineral Processing Congress; 2000; Rome, Italy: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Klimpel RR. Selection of chemical reagents for flotation. Mineral Process Plant Design. 1980;2:907–934.
   Google Scholar
• García ZH. La recuperación por flotación es una función exponencial del tiempo, II Congreso Latinoamericano de Flotación. Concepción Chile. 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Khodakarami M, Alagha L, Burnett DJ. Probing surface characteristics of rare earth minerals using contact angle measurements, atomic force microscopy, and inverse gas chromatography. ACS Omega. 2019;4(8):13319–13329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molleman B, Hiemstra T. Size and shape dependency of the surface energy of metallic nanoparticles: unifying the atomic and thermodynamic approaches. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20(31):20575–20587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph M, Hartmann R. Specific surface free energy component distributions and flotabilities of mineral microparticles in flotation – an inverse gas chromatography study. Colloids Surf, A. 2017;513:380–388.
   Google Scholar
• Ho R, Naderi M, Heng JY, et al. Effect of milling on particle shape and surface energy heterogeneity of needle-shaped crystals. Pharm Res 2012;29:2806–2816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yekeler M, Ulusoy U, Hiçyılmaz C. Effect of particle shape and roughness of talc mineral ground by different mills on the wettability and floatability. Powder Technol. 2004;140(1–2):68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed MM. Effect of comminution on particle shape and surface roughness and their relation to flotation process. Int J Miner Process. 2010;94(3-4):180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar