An investigation into the dry processing of low specific gravity ores using a laboratory Knelson concentrator

References

• Knelson B. The Knelson concentrator. Metamorphosis from crude beginning to sophisticated world wide acceptance. Miner Eng. 1992;5(10–12):1091–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knelson B, Jones R. “A new generation of Knelson concentrators” a totally secure system goes on line. Miner Eng. 1994;7:201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okanigbe D, Olawale P, Popoola A, et al. Centrifugal separation experimentation and optimum predictive model development for copper recovery from waste copper smelter dust. Cogent Eng. 2018;5(1):1551175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion C, Langlois R, Kökkılıç O, et al. A design of experiments investigation into the processing of fine Low specific gravity minerals using a laboratory Knelson concentrator. Miner Eng. 2018;135:139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angadi SI, Eswaraiah C, Jeon H-S, et al. Selection of gravity separators for the beneficiation of the Uljin tin ore. Miner Proce Extr Metall Rev. 2017;38(1):54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar Sen G. Application of full factorial experimental design and response surface methodology for chromite beneficiation by Knelson concentrator. Minerals. 2016;6(1):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savas M. Recovery of colemanite from tailing using a Knelson concentrator. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2016;52:1036–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder AK, Tiwari V, Barnwal JP. Separation characteristics of coal fines in a Knelson concentrator–a hydrodynamic approach. Coal Prep. 2007;27:126–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubiera F, Hall ST, Shah CL. Sulfur removal by fine coal cleaning processes. Fuel. 1997;76:1187–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslu T, Sahinoglu E, Yavuz M. Desulphurization and deashing of oxidized fine coal by Knelson concentrator. Fuel Process Technol. 2012;101:94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari A, Farzanegan A. An investigation on laboratory Knelson concentrator separation performance: part 2: Two-component feed separation modelling. Miner Eng. 2017;112:114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuhuni G, Klein B, Altun NE. A hybrid evolutionary performance improvement procedure for optimisation of continuous variable discharge concentrators. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;145:130–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein B, Altun NE, Ghaffari H. Use of centrifugal-gravity concentration for rejection of talc and recovery improvement in base-metal flotation. Int J Miner Metallur Mater. 2016;23:859–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordens A, Marion C, Langlois R, et al. Beneficiation of the Nechalacho rare earth deposit. part 1: gravity and magnetic separation. Miner Eng. 2016;99:111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein B, Altun NE, Ghaffari H, et al. A hybrid flotation–gravity circuit for improved metal recovery. Int J Miner Process. 2010;94:159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Burt R, Korinek G, Young S, et al. Ultrafine tantalum recovery strategies. Miner Eng. 1995;8:859–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, C., Braga, P. In-Depth characterization and preliminary beneficiation studies of heavy minerals from beach sands in Brazil, The Tenth International Heavy Minerals Conference, Sun City, South Africa; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Premaratne WAPJ, Rowson NA. Recovery of titanium from beach sand by physical separation. Eur J Mineral Process Environ Protect. 2004;4:183–193.
   Google Scholar
• McLeavy M, Klein B, Grewal I. Knelson continuous variable discharge concentrator: analysis of operating variables. International heavy minerals conference, Fremantle, WA; 2001. p. 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• McLeavy MJ. (2005). Continuous centrifugal concentrator operation and control [MASc thesis]. Department of Mining and Mineral Process Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Sakuhuni G, Altun NE, Klein B, et al. A novel laboratory procedure for predicting continuous centrifugal gravity concentration applications: The gravity release analysis. Int J Miner Process. 2016;154:66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Altun NE, Sakuhuni G, Klein B. The use of continuous centrifugal gravity concentration in grinding circuit. Modified approach for improved metallurgical performance and reduced grinding requirements. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2015;51(1):115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byron R, Roberts K. Flotation improvements in the Luzenac Pehhorwood talc concentrator. Proceedings 36th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Canada; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fullam M, Eng P, Grewal I, et al. The Knelson Continuous Variable Discharge (CVD) Concentrator. The Knelson Group, 2001, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Laplante, A.R., Huang, L., Noaparast, M., Nickoletopoulos, N. A philosopher’s stone: Turning tungsten and lead into gold-The use of synthetic ores to study gold gravity separation. 27th Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa; 1995a. p. 379–394.
   Google Scholar
• Laplante AR, Woodcock F, Noaparast M. Predicting gravity separation gold recovery. Min Metall Explor. 1995b;12:74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Habiyaremye A. Water innovation in South Africa: mapping innovation successes and diffusion constraints. Environ Sci Policy. 2020;114:217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvez A, Aitken D, Rivera D, et al. At the crossroads: can desalination be a suitable public policy solution to address water scarcity in Chile’s mining zones? J Environ Manag. 2020;258::110039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y. China’s water scarcity. J Environ Manag. 2009;90(11):3185–3196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chehreh Chelgani S, Nasiri H, Tohry A. Modeling of particle sizes for industrial HPGR products by a unique explainable AI tool- A “conscious Lab” development. Adv Powder Technol. 2021;32(11):4141–4148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Roufail R, Klein B, et al. Experimental evaluation of the conjugate anvil hammer mill – comparison of semi-confined to confined particle breakage. Miner Eng. 2019;137:34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordell L, Potapov A. Novel comminution machine may vastly improve crushing-grinding efficiency, Sixth international conference on semi-autogenous high press. Grinding Technology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nordell LK, Porter B, Potapor A. Comminution energy efficiency–understanding next steps. Proc. XXVIII Int. Mineral Processing Congress, 2016. p. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Budnitz RJ, Holdren JP. Social and environmental costs of energy systems. Annu Rev Energy. 1976;1(1):553–580.
   Google Scholar
• Kökkılıç O, Langlois R, Waters KE. A design of experiments investigation into dry separation using a Knelson concentrator. Miner Eng. 2015;72:73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Zhao Y, Lv B, et al. Dry coal beneficiation technique in the gas–solid fluidized bed: a review. Int J Coal Prep Utili. 2022; 42(4): 986–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson S, Iveson S, Galvin K. Density based separations in the reflux classifier with an air–sand dense–medium and vibration. Miner Eng. 2010;23(2):74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood M, Langlois R, Waters KE. The potential for dry processing using a Knelson concentrator. Miner Eng. 2013;45:44–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Kökkılıç O, Langlois R, et al. Size-by-size analysis of dry gravity separation using a 3-in. Knelson concentrator. Miner Eng. 2016;91:42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Yang H-Y, Tong L-L, et al. Research and application of a Knelson concentrator: A review. Miner Eng. 2020;152:106339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Wei L, Zhu X, et al. Response surface method for modeling of fine coal beneficiation by Knelson concentrator. Int J Coal Prep Util. 2021;41(11):776–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oney O, Samanli S, Niedoba T, et al. Determination of the important operating variables on cleaning fine coal by Knelson concentrator and evaluation of the performance through upgrading curves. Int J Coal Prep Utili. 2020;40(10):666–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, J.H., 1998. A study of a variable speed 3-in Knelson concentrator. Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering. McGill University, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Box GE, Hunter JS. Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Annals Math Stat. 1957;28(1): 195–241.
   Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. In: S Kotz, NL Johnson, editors. Breakthroughs in Statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer; 1992. p. 270–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_23.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y-C, Parlar H. Enrichment behavior of immunoglobulin by foam fractionation using response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;107:102–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, ninth edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yi S, Su Y, Qi B, et al. Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design in optimizing the preparation conditions of vinyltriethoxysilane modified silicalite/polydimethylsiloxane hybrid pervaporation membranes. Sep Purif Technol. 2010;71(2):252–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeng D, Morrell S, Napier-Munn T. Application of central composite rotatable design to modelling the effect of some operating variables on the performance of the three-product cyclone. Int J Miner Process. 2005;76(3):181–192.
   Google Scholar