“He Doesn’t Belong in This House”: The Uncanny Cousin in Two Mid-Century Gothic Novels

Works Cited

• Andeweg, A., and S. Zlosnik. Gothic Kinship, Manchester UP, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Armitt, L. “History of the Gothic: Twentieth-century Gothic.” U of Wales P, 2011, Accessed 8 September 2022. https://www-jstor-org.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/stable/j.ctt9qhdsp.1.
   Google Scholar
• Ascher Barnstone, D. “Introduction: The Overlooked Trope of the Doppelganger.” The Doppelgänger, edited by D. Ascher Barnstone, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bittles, A. H. “Consanguinity in Context.” Cambridge UP, 2012, Accessed 25 October 2022. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/detail.action?docID=907116.
   Google Scholar
• Botting, F. Homely Gothic. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bras, H., et al. “Relatives as Spouses: Preferences and Opportunities for Kin Marriage in a Western Society.” American Journal of Human Biology, vol. 21, no. 6, 2009, pp. 793–804. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhm, S. “The Contemporary Gothic: Why We Need It.” The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction, edited by J. E. Hogel, Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 259–76.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, L. “The Establishment and Preservation of Female Power in Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, 1984, pp. 32–38. doi: 10.2307/3346088.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, L. M., and S. M. Bianchi. Continuity and Change in the American Family. SAGE Publications, 2002. doi: 10.4135/9781452233871.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, N., et al. Families in Transition: Social Change, Family Formation and Kin Relationships, Bristol UP, 2008, Accessed 13 January 2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qgxdp.
   Google Scholar
• Cicirelli, V. G. Sibling Relationships across the Life Span, Plenum P, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, M. J. Family Likeness: Sex, Marriage, and Incest from Jane Austen to Virginia Woolf, Cornell UP, 2008, Accessed 8 September 2022. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v9fc.
   Google Scholar
• DiPlacidi, J. Gothic Incest: Gender, Sexuality and Transgression, Manchester UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Du Maurier, D. Enchanted Cornwall, Penguin, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Du Maurier, D. My Cousin Rachel, Sourcebooks, Inc, 1951) 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fishel, E. Sisters: Love and Rivalry inside the Family and beyond, William Morrow, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. “1976. Fiction and Its Phantoms: A Reading of Freud’s Das Unheimliche (The ‘Uncanny’).” Thinking in the Arts, Sciences, and Literature, vol. 7, no. 3, 1919, pp. 619–45. doi: 10.2307/468561.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, William R. “Genealogy and Incest in Wuthering Heights.” Studies in the Novel, vol. 19, no. 4, 1982, pp. 359–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, A. “‘Listening to What She Had Almost Said’: Containment and Duality in Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle.” Shirley Jackson, Influences and Confluences, edited by M. R. Anderson and L. Kröger, Routledge, 2016, pp. 111–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hattenhauer, D. Shirley Jackson’s American Gothic, State U of New York P, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, A., and S. Zlosnik. Daphne du Maurier: Writing, Identity and the Gothic Imagination, Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ittel, A, and A. Sisler. Siblings in Adolescence: Emerging Individuals, Lasting Bonds. Psychology P, 2015. doi: 10.4324/9781315737492.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. We Have Always Lived in the Castle, Penguin, 1962) 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, A. K. The Suppressed Sister: A Relationship in Novels by nineteenth-and- twentieth-century British Women, Bucknell UP, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• May, L. S. Disorderly Sisters: Sibling Relations and Sororal Resistance in nineteenth-century British Literature, Bucknell UP, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, H. Femicidal Fears: Narratives of the Female Gothic Experience, State U of New York P, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Milevsky, A. Sibling Relationships in Childhood and Adolescence: Predictors and Outcomes, Columbia UP, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. E. “Beautiful Creatures: The Ethics of Female Beauty in Daphne du Maurier’s Fiction.” Women: A Cultural Review, vol. 20, no. 1, 2009, pp. 25–41. doi: 10.1080/0957404802684798.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey-Roberts, M. “The Female Gothic Body.” Women and the Gothic: An Edinburgh Companion, edited by A. Horner and S. Zlosnik, Edinburgh UP, 2016, pp. 106–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, J. “Obsessional Neurosis, the paranoid-schizoid Position, and the Bourgeois Family in Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle.” American Imago, vol. 78, no. 1, 2021, pp. 131–54. doi: 10.1353/aim.2021.0004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, J. C. “Shirley Jackson’s Witchcraft: We Have Always Lived in the Castle. Afterword.” We Have Always Lived in the Castle, Penguin Books, 2009, pp. 148–58.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D. B., and H. G. Spencer. ““It’s Ok, We’re Not Cousins by Blood”: The Cousin Marriage Controversy in Historical Perspective.” PLOS Biology, vol. 6, no. 12, 2008, pp. e320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, R. “Incest as the Meaning of the Gothic Novel.” The Eighteenth Century, vol. 39, no. 5, 1998, pp. 261–78. https://www.jstor.org.stable/pdf/41467695.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, R. Novel Relations: The Transformation of Kinship in English Literature and Culture 1748–1818, Cambridge UP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Royle, N. The Uncanny, Manchester UP, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, V. The brother-sister Culture in nineteenth-century Literature: From Austen to Woolf, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens Mink, J., and J. Doubler Ward. “Introduction.” The Significance of Sibling Relationships in Literature, edited by J. Stephens Mink and J. Doubler Ward, Bowling Green State U Popular P, 1993, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. Art of Darkness: A Poetics of Gothic, The U of Chicago P, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, C. G. “The Radcliffean Gothic Model: A Form for Feminine Sexuality.” Modern Language Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, 1979, pp. 98–113. doi: 10.2307/3194284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar