Enhanced strength and toughness of repurposed glass fiber reinforced adhesive joints for sewage applications

References

• ASCE. 2009 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N.; George, S.; John, S.; George, S. Stress Analysis of Underground Grp Pipe Subjected to Internal and External Loading Conditions. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grp Pipe Benefits from Africa’s Water Shortage. Reinf. Plast. 1997, 41(8), 38–43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034361797883397. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-3617(97)88339-7.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. M. Mechanics of Composite Materials; CRC press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sirimanna, C.; Manalo, A.; Karunasena, W.; Banerjee, S.; McGarva, L. 13 - Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (Frp) Repair Systems for Corroded Steel Pipelines. In Rehabilitation of Pipelines Using Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites; Karbhari, V. M. Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, 2015; pp. 267–285. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857096845000138. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-85709-684-5.00013-8.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, D. E., Jr; Polk, T. A. Multi-Section Length of Pipe and Associated Methods for Making the Same. uS Patent App. 14/672,753, Oct 1, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerly, R. D. Multi-piece pipe clamp, uS Patent 4,568,115, Feb 4, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, X.; Marques, E.; Machado, J.; Carbas, R.; Jiang, D.; da Silva, L. Review on Techniques to Improve the Strength of Adhesive Joints with Composite Adherends. Compos. B Eng. 2019, 177, 107363. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, L. F. M.; Marques, E. A. S.; Campilho, R. D. S. G. Design Rules and Methods to Improve Joint Strength; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018, pp. 773–810. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55411-2_27.
   Google Scholar
• Dvorak, G. J.; Zhang, J.; Canyurt, O. Adhesive Tongue-And-Groove Joints for Thick Composite Laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61(8), 1123–1142. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00012-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melogranaa, J. D.; Grenestedt, J. L.; Maroun, W. J. Adhesive Tongue-And-Groove Joints Between Thin Carbon Fiber Laminates and Steel, Composites Part a. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2003, 34(2), 119–124. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00005-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.; Luo, R.; Bi, Y.; Xiang, Q.; Lin, C.; Zhang, Y.; An, N. The Preparation and Performance of Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Adhesive for Bonding Carbon/Carbon Composites. Carbon. 2008, 46(14), 1957–1965. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K.-S.; Yi, Y.-M.; Cho, G.-R.; Kim, C.-G. Failure Prediction and Strength Improvement of Uni-Directional Composite Single Lap Bonded Joints. Compos. Struct. 2008, 82(4), 513–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart-Smith, L. Adhesive-Bonded Double-Lap Joints, NASA Contract Report.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. Analysis of Tubular Adhesive Joints with a Functionally Modulus Graded Bondline Subjected to Axial Loads. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009, 29(8), 785–795. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.; Wardle, B. L.; Arif, M. F. Strength and Performance Enhancement of Bonded Joints by Spatial Tailoring of Adhesive Compliance via 3d Printing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9(1), 884–891. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b13038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.; Wardle, B. L.; Arif, M. F.; Ubaid, J. Stress Reduction of 3d Printed Compliance-Tailored Multilayers. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20(1), 1700883. DOI: 10.1002/adem.201700883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M.; Kumar, S. Performance Enhancement of Tubular Multilayers via Compliance-Tailoring: 3d Printing, Testing and Modeling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 140, 93–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, X.; Marques, E.; Machado, J.; Carbas, R.; Jiang, D.; da Silva, L. A Strategy to Reduce Delamination of Adhesive Joints with Composite Substrates. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2019, 233(3), 521–530.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, L. F.; Adams, R. Techniques to Reduce the Peel Stresses in Adhesive Joints with Composites. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2007, 27(3), 227–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaid, J.; Wardle, B. L.; Kumar, S. Strength and Performance Enhancement of Multilayers by Spatial Tailoring of Adherend Compliance and Morphology via Multimaterial Jetting Additive Manufacturing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31819-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M.; Kumar, S.; Reddy, J. Material-Tailored Adhesively Bonded Multilayers: A Theoretical Analysis. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 148, 246–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya-Sanz, E. M.; Ivañez, I.; Garcia-Castillo, S. K. Effect of the Geometry in the Strength of Single-Lap Adhesive Joints of Composite Laminates Under Uniaxial Tensile Load. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2017, 72, 23–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, M.; Ajdari, A.; Rahbar, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Nayeb-Hashemi, H.; Vaziri, A. Adhesively Bonded Single Lap Joints with Non-Flat Interfaces. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012, 32, 46–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodepudi, R.; Hughes, D. J.; Pradhan, A. Evaluation of Optimum Configuration of Adhesively Bonded Reverse Bent Joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2017, 77, 78–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canyurt, O.; Meran, C.; Uslu, M. The Effect of Design on Adhesive Joints of Thick Composite Sandwich Structures. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2008, 31(2), 301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Canyurt, O. E.; Meran, C. Fatigue Strength Estimation of Adhesively Bonded Tongue and Groove Joint of Thick Woven Composite Sandwich Structures Using Genetic Algorithm Approach. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012, 33, 80–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molitor, P.; Barron, V.; Young, T. Surface Treatment of Titanium for Adhesive Bonding to Polymer Composites: A Review. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2001, 21(2), 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oseli, A.; Prodan, T.; Susič, E.; Perše, L. S. The Effect of Short Fiber Orientation on Long Term Shear Behavior of 40% Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyphenylene Sulfide. Polym. Test. 2020, 81, 106262. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abusrea, M. R.; Arakawa, K. Improvement of an Adhesive Joint Constructed from Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic and Dry Carbon Fiber Laminates, Composites Part B. Compos. B Eng. 2016, 97, 368–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, P.; Kumar, S.; Reddy, J.; Lacy, T. E. Multiscale Modeling of Strength and Failure Behavior of Carbon Nanostructure Reinforced Epoxy Composite Adhesives in Bonded Systems. Eur. J. Mech.- A/solids. 2020, 80, 103932. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick, P. K. Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Materials, Manufacturing, and Design; CRC press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Delzendehrooy, F.; Ayatollahi, M.; Akhavan-Safar, A.; da Silva, L. Strength Improvement of Adhesively Bonded Single Lap Joints with Date Palm Fibers: Effect of Type, Size, Treatment Method and Density of Fibers, Composites Part B. Engineering. 2020, 188, 107874. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouhmid, B.; Imad, A.; Benseddiq, N.; Benmedakhène, S.; Maazouz, A. A Study of the Mechanical Behaviour of a Glass Fibre Reinforced Polyamide 6, 6: Experimental Investigation. Polym. Test. 2006, 25(4), 544–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D.; He, M.; Qin, S.; Yu, J. Effect of Fiber Length and Dispersion on Properties of Long Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites Based on Poly (Butylene Terephthalate. Rsc. Adv. 2017, 7(25), 15439–15454. DOI: 10.1039/C7RA00686A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard, I.; ISO, B. Plastics—Determination of Flexural Properties; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Wernik, J.; Meguid, S. Multiscale Modeling of the Nonlinear Response of Nano-Reinforced Polymers. Acta. Mech. 2011, 217(1–2), 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s00707-010-0377-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernik, J.; Meguid, S. Multiscale Micromechanical Modeling of the Constitutive Response of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Structural Adhesives. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2014, 51(14), 2575–2589. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astm, C. Astm Standards; American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Digimat Documentation Release. 2017. 0 – December 2016, MSC Software Belgium SA, ZAE Robert Steichen – 5 Rue Bommel, Hautcharage, L-4940, Luxembourg. 2016.
   Google Scholar