Determination of Toughness Variation and Cohesive Zone Parameters for De-bonding of Adhesively Bonded PMMA and Steel Using the Shaft-loaded Blister Test

References

• Volinsky, A. A.; Moody, N. R.; Gerberich, W. W. Interfacial Toughness Measurements for Thin Films on Substrates. Acta. Materialia. 2002, 50(3), 441–466. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00354-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugdale, D. S. Yielding of Steel Sheets Containing Slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1960, 8(2), 100–104. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, B.; Worswick, M. J.; Cronin, D. S. A Novel Cohesive Zone Modelling Approach to Represent Mixed Mode Loading and Bond Line Thickness Effects. J. Adhesion. 2023, 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2023.2184688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škec, L.; Alfano, G. Experimental and Numerical Study of Rate-Dependent Mode-I Failure of a Structural Adhesive. J. Adhesion. 2022, 99(8), 1323–55. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2022.2106132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, B. D.; Nunes, P. D. P.; Henriques, B. S.; Marques, E. A. S.; Carbas, R. J. C.; da Silva, L. F. M. Determination of Mode I Cohesive Law of Structural Adhesives Using the Direct Method. J. Adhesion. 2022, 99(10), 1650–1677. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2022.2152677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. L. The Stresses Around a Fault or Crack in Dissimilar Media. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. Apr 1, 1959, 49(2), 199–204. DOI: 10.1785/BSSA0490020199.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. R. Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks. ASME. J. Appl. Mech. 1988, 55(1), 98–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suo, Z.; Hutchinson, J. W. Interface Crack Between Two Elastic Layers. International Journal of Fracture. 1990;43:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Cao, H. C.; Evans, A. G. An Experimental Study of the Fracture Resistance of Bimaterial Interfaces. Mech. Mater. 1989, 7(4), 295–304. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6636(89)90020-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malyshev, B. M.; Salganik, R. L. The Strength of Adhesive Joints Using the Theory of Cracks. Int. J. Fract. Mech. 1965, 1, 14–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. S.; Suo, Z. Experimental Determination of Interfacial Toughness Curves Using Brazil-Nut-Sandwiches. Acta. Metallurgica et Materialia. 1990, 38(7), 1279–1290.
   Google Scholar
• Lacombe, R. Adhesion Measurement Methods: Theory and Practice; CRC Press: 2005 Nov 21. DOI: 10.1201/9781420028829.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. W.; Suo, Z. Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials. Adv. appl. mech. 1991, 29(C), 63–191. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9.
   Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, H. Measurement of Adhesion by a Blister Method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1961, 5(14), 125–134. DOI: 10.1002/APP.1961.070051401.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. M. The Blister Test for Interface Toughness Measurement. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1991, 40(3), 475–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. M.; Thouless, M. D. Effects of Residual Stresses in the Blister Test. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 1993, 30(6), 779–795. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(93)90040-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, K. T.; Mai, Y. W. Fracture Mechanics of a Shaft-Loaded Blister of Thin Flexible Membrane on Rigid Substrate. Int. J. Fract. 1995, 74(2), 181–197. DOI: 10.1007/BF00036264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, K.; Wan, K. T. Evaluation of Film-Substrate Interface Durability Using a Shaft-Loaded Blister Test. J. Compos. Tech. Res. 2001, 23(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brien, E. P. O.; Goldfarb, S.; White, C. C. Influence of Experimental Setup and Plastic Deformation on the Shaft-Loaded Blister Test. J. Adhes. 2005, 81(6), 599–621. DOI: 10.1080/00218460590954601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. S.; Tong, L. Effects of Initial Blister Radius and Shaft Diameter on Energy Release Rate of Metal-Polymer Composite Coating. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2015, 62, 107–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, J. M.; Kotsikos, G.; Gibson, A. G. Strain Energy Release Rate in Shaft-Loaded Blister Tests for Composite Repairs on Steel. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 81, 129–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barros, S.; Fadhil, B. M.; Alila, F.; Diop, J.; Reis, J. M. L.; Casari, P.; Jacquemin, F. Using Blister Test to Predict the Failure Pressure in Bonded Composite Repaired Pipes. Compos. Struct. 2019, 211, 125–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffre, C.; Dawood, B.; Yavas, D.; Bastawros, A. Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Ice Adhesion Using the Blister Test. SAE Tech. Pap. 2019, 2019-June(June), 1–7. DOI: 10.4271/2019-01-1948.
   Google Scholar
• Dundurs, J. Discussion: “Edge-Bonded Dissimilar Orthogonal Elastic Wedges Under Normal and Shear Loading” (Bogy, D. B., 1968, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 35, Pp. 460–466). J. Appl. Mech. 1969, 36(3), 650–652. DOI: 10.1115/1.3564739.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Z. H.; Sun, C. T. Cohesive Zone Modeling of Interface Fracture in Elastic Bi-Materials. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2005, 72(12), 1805–1817. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, C. F.; Asaro, R. J. Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Cracks on Bimaterial Interfaces: Part II- Structure of Small-Scale Yielding Fields. J. Appl. Mech, Trans. ASME. 1989, 56(4), 763–779. DOI: 10.1115/1.3176170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, C. F.; Moran, B.; Nakamura, T. Energy Release Rate Along a Three-Dimensional Crack Front in a Thermally Stressed Body. Int. J. Fract. 1986, 30(2), 79–102. DOI: 10.1007/BF00034019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, C. K.; Basu, S.; Parameswaran, V. Determination of Traction Separation Law for Interfacial Failure in Adhesive Joints at Different Loading Rates. J. Adhes. 2016, 92(10), 819–839. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2015.1046986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simulia, D. S. Abaqus 6.14 CAE User Guide. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. 2014, 6.14, 1146.
   Google Scholar
• Turon, A.; Dávila, C. G.; Camanho, P. P.; Costa, J. An Engineering Solution for Mesh Size Effects in the Simulation of Delamination Using Cohesive Zone Models. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2007, 74(10), 1665–1682. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z.; Tao, L.; Akinwande, D.; Huang, R.; Liechti, K. M. Mixed-Mode Traction-Separation Relations Between Graphene and Copper by Blister Tests. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 2016, 84, 147–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S.; Na, S. R.; Liechti, K. M.; Bonnecaze, R. T. A Cohesive Zone Model and Scaling Analysis for Mixed-Mode Interfacial Fracture. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 2017, 129, 167–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, H.; Mahajan, P. Modeling Damage Induced Plasticity for Low Velocity Impact Simulation of Three Dimensional Fiber Reinforced Composite. Compos. Struct. 2015, 131, 290–303. DOI: 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.04.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenane, M.; Benzeggagh, M. L. Mixed-Mode Delamination Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Composites Under Fatigue Loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1997, 57(5), 597–605. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00021-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar