Student- and School-Level Predictors of Geography Achievement in the United States, 1994–2018

References

• Abedi, J., and J. Herman. 2010. Assessing English language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: Issues and limitations. Teachers College Record 112 (3):723–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, D., and W. Welser, IV. 2015. The democratization of space: New actors need new rules. Foreign Affairs 94 (3):98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S., S. Heffron, and N.T. Huynh (eds.). 2013. A road map for 21st century geography education: Geography education research (a report from the Geography Education Research Committee of the road map for 21st century geography education project). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., F. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, and W. Schmidt. 2014. International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and Opportunities to Learn. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. M., and D. Shifrer. 2016. Equitable access for secondary English learner students: Course taking as evidence of EL program effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly: EAQ 52 (3):463–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dony, C. C., A. Nara, S. Rey, M. Solem, and T. Herman. 2019. Encoding geography: Building capacity for inclusive geocomputational thinking with geospatial technologies. California State University Geospatial Review 16:2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, R. 2016. Bringing geography back to life: the role of the geospatial revolution in schools. Geography 101 (2):77–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2016.12093988.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, R. M. 2012. The NAEP Geography Report 2010: What will we do next? Journal of Geography 111 (1):39–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.615412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., R. J. Shavelson, and J. A. Wertheim (eds.). 2013. A road map for 21st century geography education: Assessment (a report from the Geography Education Research Committee of the road map for 21st century geography education project). Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, P. G., T. L. Heafner, and R. G. Lambert. 2017. An analysis of predictors of history content knowledge: Implications for policy and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives 25:65. doi: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2761.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. 2015. K-12 education: Most eighth grade students are not proficient in geography (GAO-16-7). Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gribben, M. A., S. R. Schultz, and A. P. Woods. 2019. National-only NAEP results (arts, civics, economics, geography, technology and engineering literacy, and U.S. history): Who uses them, why, and how. Human Resources Research Organization Report 2019 No. 007, Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Heafner, T. L., and P. G. Fitchett. 2015. An opportunity to learn US history: What NAEP data suggest regarding the opportunity gap. The High School Journal 98 (3):226–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2015.0006.
   Google Scholar
• Heafner, T. L., P. J. VanFossen, and P. G. Fitchett. 2019. Predictors of students’ achievement on NAEP-economics: A multilevel model. The Journal of Social Studies Research 43 (4):327–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, A., S. N. Elliott, C. J. Lemons, N. Zigmond, A. Kloo, and R. J. Kettler. 2014. Assessing opportunity to learn for students with disabilities in general and special education classes. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(1): 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, T., M. Solem, J. Zadrozny, and R. G. Boehm. 2021. Contextualizing powerful geographic knowledge in higher education: Data-driven curriculum design to interweave student aspirations with workforce applications. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 516: 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2021.1902622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., and M. Maslin. 2015. Defining the anthropocene. Nature 519 (7542):171–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. and N. Schenker. 1995. Missing data. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 39–76). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. M. 1995. Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17 (3):305–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737017003305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Monitoring educational equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/25389.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Changing expectations for the K-12 Teacher Workforce: Policies, preservice education, professional development, and the workplace. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/25603.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., A. S. Bryk, Y. F. Cheong, R. Congdon, and M. Du Toit. 2019. HLM 8: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Schlemper, M. B., V. C. Stewart, S. Shetty, and K. Czajkowski. 2018. Including students’ geographies in geography education: Spatial narratives, citizen mapping, and social justice. Theory & Research in Social Education 46 (4):603–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1427164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., N. A. Burroughs, P. Zoido, and R. T. Houang. 2015. The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher 44 (7):371–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15603982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., and A. Maier. 2009. Opportunity to learn. In Handbook of education policy research, ed. G. Sykes, B. Schneider, and D. N. Plank, 541–59. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., P. Zoido, and L. S. Cogan. 2013. Schooling matters: Opportunity to learn in PISA 2012. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 95, Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M., C. Dony, T. Herman, K. León, A. Magdy, A. Nara, W. Ray, S. Rey, and R. Russell. 2021. Building Educational Capacity for Inclusive Geocomputation: A Research-Practice Partnership in Southern California. Journal of Geography 120 (4):152–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.1933140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, F. I. 1996. The need to expand the opportunity to learn conceptual framework: Should students, parents, and school resources be included? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY, April.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, J. E., Ó. Chávez, R. E. Reys, and B. J. Reys. 2006. From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students’ opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics 106 (4):191–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18075.x.
   Google Scholar
• Umansky, I. M. 2016. Leveled and exclusionary tracking: English learners’ access to academic content in middle school. American Educational Research Journal 53 (6):1792–833. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216675404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. 2018. NAEP technical documentation on the Web. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/tdw/sitemap.aspx (Accessed 31 October, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, H., S. Dyer, M. Solem, M. Haigh, and S. Waddington. 2018. A capabilities approach to higher education: Geocapabilities and implications for geography curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 42 (1):7–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1379060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar