2,319
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Selecting the special or choosing the common? A high-powered conceptual replication of Kim and Markus’ (1999) pen studyOpen DataOpen Materials

Pages 244-250 | Received 12 Oct 2021, Accepted 20 Jan 2022, Published online: 03 Feb 2022

References

  • Ben-Shachar, M. S., Lüdecke, D., & Makowski, D. (2020). effectsize: Estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(56), 2815. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815
  • Blondé, J., & Girandola, F. (2016). Revealing the elusive effects of vividness: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences assessing the effect of vividness on persuasion. Social Influence, 11(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2016.1157096
  • Cai, H., Zou, X., Feng, Y., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2018). Increasing need for uniqueness in contemporary China: Empirical evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00009
  • Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
  • Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., & Thompson, S. C. (1988). The vividness effect: Elusive or illusory? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90041-8
  • Crandall, C. S., & Sherman, J. W. (2016). On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002
  • Crane, D. (2014). Cultural globalization and the dominance of the American film industry: Cultural policies, national film industries, and transnational film. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2013.832233
  • Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752
  • Etchebehere, S., & Fedorovskaya, E. (2017). On the role of color in visual saliency. Electronic Imaging, 2017(14), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.2352/.2470-1173.2017.14.HVEI-119
  • Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
  • Gillani, A., Kutaula, S., Leonidou, L. C., & Christodoulides, P. (2021). The impact of proximity on consumer fair trade engagement and purchasing behavior: The moderating role of empathic concern and hypocrisy. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04278-6
  • Han, S. P., & Shavitt, S. (1994). Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1016
  • Hansen, N., Postmes, T., Van Der Vinne, N., & Van Thiel, W. (2012). Information and communication technology and cultural change. Social Psychology, 43(4), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000123
  • Harrell, F. E. (2021). Package ‘Hmisc.’ https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc
  • Huntsinger, C. S., Shaboyan, T., & Karapetyan, A. M. (2019). The influence of globalization on adolescents’ conceptions of self and future self in rural and urban Armenia. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(164), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20280
  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
  • Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Jr, Alper, S., Sowden, W., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., Rédei, A. C., … Aveyard, M. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  • Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12714–12719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710966114
  • MGM Research. (2018, December 21). China Vs United States – A GDP comparison. https://mgmresearch.com/china-vs-united-states-a-gdp-comparison/m
  • Mischel, W., & Moore, B. (1973). Effects of attention to symbolically presented rewards on self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035716
  • Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2007). Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: The influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1086/510227
  • Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949
  • Motion Picture Association. (2018, February 1). The economic contribution of the motion picture & television industry to the United States. https://www.motionpictures.org/research-docs/the-economic-contribution-of-themotion-picture-television-industry-to-the-united-states/
  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Valuation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
  • Peng, L., & Luo, S. (2021). Impact of social economic development on personality traits among Chinese college students: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 2001–2016. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110461
  • Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/209563
  • Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89(2), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155
  • Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, & Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000175
  • Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x
  • Zhang, J. (2010). The persuasiveness of individualistic and collectivistic advertising appeals among Chinese generation-X consumers. Journal of Advertising, 39(3), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367390305
  • Zhang, J., & Shavitt, S. (2003). Cultural values in advertisements to the Chinese Xgeneration–promoting modernity and individualism. Journal of Aadvertising, 32(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639047