The effect of the judge’s condition on the judgment of others’ well-being

References

• Angelini, V., Cavapozzi, D., Corazzini, L., & Paccagnella, O. (2014). Do danes and italians rate life satisfaction in the same way? Using vignettes to correct for individualspecific scale biases. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(5), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, J. L., Theuns, P., Mazaheri, M., Hofmans, J., Fliege, H., & Rose, M. (2006). The potential of anamnestic comparative self-assessment (ACSA) to reduce bias in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-4755-0
   Google Scholar
• Biernat, M. (2012). Standards and expectancies: Contrast and assimilation in judgments of self and others. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42(42), 319–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42006-7
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 745–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<745::AID-EJSP24>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubić, A., & Erceg, N. (2018). The role of decision making styles in explaining happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(1), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9816-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2809–2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan, E., Parker, S., & Zellner, D. A. (2013). Beauty beyond compare: Effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C. R., & Gilovich, T. (2008). Incidental environmental anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. (1955). Processes affecting scores on” understanding of others” and” assumed similarity.”. Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunny, K. A., & Perri, M., III. (1991). Single-item vs multiple-item measures of health-related quality of life. Psychological Reports, 69(1), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 41–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010076127199
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9129-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., & Cohen, G. L. (1992). Egocentric definitions of traits and abilities in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y. (1993). Goals as determinants of nonlinear noncompensatory judgment strategies: Leniency vs strictness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(3), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol-Prokopczyk, H., Verdes-Tennant, E., McEniry, M., & Ispány, M. (2015). Promises and pitfalls of anchoring vignettes in health survey research. Demography, 52(5), 1703–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0422-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., & DePaulo, B. M. (1982). Accuracy of person perception: A component analysis according to Cronbach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282082011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 3, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2012). “A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects” Nature. Retrieved October 12, 2012, from http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.6716.1349271308!/suppinfoFile/Kahneman%20Letter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Murray, C. J., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540400108X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopman, D. S., & Ryberg, S. (1989). A verbal memory test with high predictive accuracy for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 46(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520380041011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maaravi, Y., Pazy, A., & Ganzach, Y. (2014). Winning a battle but losing the war: On the drawbacks of using the anchoring tactic in distributive negotiations. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, I. (2010). Measures of self-perceived well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2001). ‘Seek and ye shall find’: Antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. European Review of Social Psychology, 10(1), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000044
   Google Scholar
• Novotney, A. (2014, March 3). Gross national well-being. American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/03/well-being.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Riis, J., Loewenstein, G., Baron, J., Jepson, C., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). Ignorance of Hedonic Adaptation to Hemodialysis: A Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schkade, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9(5), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J. B. (1999). The overspent American: Why we want what we don’t need. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Assimilation and contrast effects in attitude measurement: An inclusion/exclusion model. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale Univer. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp, C. W., Østergaard, S. D., Søndergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1159/000376585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: theory and emprical evidence Journal of happiness studies, 5(3), 223–239 .
   Google Scholar
• Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinokur, A. D., Schul, Y., Vuori, J., & Price, R. H. (2000). Two years after a job loss: long-term impact of the JOBS program on reemployment and mental health. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(1), 32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinberg, M. K., Seton, C., & Cameron, N. (2018). The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(1), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar