Microbial inoculant and cottonseed cake as additives for millet silage at different fermentation times

References

• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis: changes in official methods of analysis made at the annual meeting. Supplement: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardes TF, Daniel JLP, Adesogan AT, McAllister TA, Drouin P, Nussio LG, Huhtanen P, Tremblay GF, Bélanger G, Cai Y. 2018. Silage review: unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):4001–4019. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen KK, Lin C, Brent BE, Feyerherm AM, Urban JE, Aimutis WR. 1992. Effect of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfalfa and corn silages. J Dairy Sci. 75(11):3066–3083. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78070-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. 2018. Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):3952–3979. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco RH, Rodrigues MT, da Silva MMC, Rodrigues CAF, de Queiroz AC, de Araújo FL. 2010. Efeito dos níveis de fibra da forragem sobre o consumo, a produção e a eficiência de utilização de nutrientes em cabras lactantes. Rev Bras Zootec. 39:2477–2485.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho GGP, Freitas PMD, Santos EM, Araújo GGL, Oliveira JS, Pires AJ V, Maranhão CMA, Rodrigues T, Freitas Júnior JE, Rufino LMA. 2018. Effect of pearl millet silage ammoniated with urea on lamb production and metabolic performance. Grass Forage Sci. 73(3):685–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney AL, Marbach EP. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 8(2):130–132. doi:10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmley E. 2001. Towards improved silage quality – a review. Can J Anim Sci. 81(2):157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel JLP, Capelesso A, Cabezas-Garcia EH, Zopollatto M, Santos MC, Huhtanen P, Nussio LG. 2014. Fibre digestion potential in sugarcane across the harvesting window. Grass Forage Sci. 69(1):176–181. doi:10.1111/gfs.12044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 28(3):350–356. doi:10.1021/ac60111a017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas PMDD, Carvalho GGPD, Santos EM, Araújo GGL, Oliveira JSD, Pires AJV, Maranhão CMDA, Rodrigues TCGDC, Pinto LFB. 2017. Parâmetros qualitativos da silagem de milheto amonizada com ureia, a diferentes densidades de compactação. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras. 52(8):679–689.
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães Júnior R, Gonçalves LC, Rodrigues JAS, Jayme DG, Pires DAA, Borges ALCC, Rodriguez NM, Saliba EOS, Borges I. 2005. Matéria seca, proteína bruta, nitrogênio amoniacal e pH das silagens de três genótipos de milheto [Pennisetum glaucum (l). R. Br.] em diferentes períodos de fermentação. Brazilian J Maize Sorghum. 4(2):251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Jobim CC, Nussio LG, Reis RA, Schmidt P. 2007. Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da forragem conservada methodological advances in evaluation. Rev Bras Zootec. 36:101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Weary DM, Von Keyserlingk MAG. 2011. Hay intake improves performance and rumen development of calves fed higher quantities of milk. J Dairy Sci. 94(7):3547–3553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung L, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. 2018. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):4020–4033. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima R, Pessoa R, Nascimento W, Silva J, Ferraz I. 2018. Palma forrageira associada à silagem de sorgo corrigida com ureia e farelo de algodão em dietas para novilhos Girolando. Bol Indústria Anim. 74(4):342–350. doi:10.17523/bia.v74n4p342.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro Junior FL, Bumbieris Junior VH, Zanin E, da Silva LDDF, Galbeiro S, Pereira ES, Neumann M, Mizubuti IY. 2020. Effect of storage time and use of additives on the quality of grape pomace silages. J Food Process Preserv. 44(4):e14373. doi:10.1111/jfpp.14373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJ. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow: Chalcombe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev Bras Zootec. 39:183–191.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Research Council, editor: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahlow G, Muck R, Driehuis F, Oude Elferink S, Spoelstra SF. 2003. Microbiology of ensiling. Silage Sci Technol. 42:31–93. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr42.c2.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira GA, Santos EM, Araújo GGL, Oliveira JS, Pinho RMA, Zanine ADM, Souza AFN, Macêdo AJS, Neto JMC, Nascimento TVC. 2019. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria in fresh plants and in silage from Opuntia and their effects on the fermentation and aerobic stability of silage. J Agric Sci. 157(9–10):684–692. doi:10.1017/S0021859620000143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho RMA, Santos EM, Campos FS, Ramos JPDF, Macedo CHO, Bezerra HFC, Perazzo AF. 2014. Silages of pearl millet submitted to nitrogen fertilization. Ciência Rural. 44(5):918–924. doi:10.1590/s0103-84782014000500025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho RMA, Santos EM, Rodrigues JAS, Macedo CHO, Campos FS, Ramos JPF, Bezerra HFC, Perazzo AF. 2013. Avaliação de genótipos de milheto para silagem no semiárido. Rev Bras Saúde e Produção Anim. 14(3):426–436.
   Google Scholar
• Playne MJ, McDonald P. 1966. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. J Sci Food Agric. 17(6):264–268. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740170609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis RA, Siqueira GR, Roth MTP, Roth A. 2008. Fatores que afetam o consumo de forragens conservadas. Produção e Util forragens Conserv Masson, Mar PR.:9–40.
   Google Scholar
• Santos RD, Neves ALA, Pereira LGR, Sollenberger LE, Muniz EN, Souza EYB, Sobral AJS, Costa N V, Gonçalves LC. 2020. Performance, agronomic traits, ensilability and nutritive value of pearl millet cultivar harvested at different growth stages. J Agric Sci. 158(3):225–232. doi:10.1017/S0021859620000222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva TC, Silva LD, Santos EM, Oliveira JS, Perazzo AF. 2017. Importance of the fermentation to produce high-quality silage. In: Jozala AF, editor. Ferment process. Rijeka: IntechOpen; p. 3–22. doi:10.5772/64887.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor CC, Kung L. 2002. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of high moisture corn in laboratory Silos1. J Dairy Sci. 85(6):1526–1532. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74222-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisoli FDCA, França AFS, Corrêa DS, Trevisoli PA, Oliveira LGD. 2017. Nutritional composition of silage from pearl millet cultivars with the inclusion of soy hulls. Rev Ciênc Agron. [accessed 2021 Apr 5]:[8 p.]. http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902017000300540&nrm=iso.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JM, Davies DR. 2013. The aerobic stability of silage: key findings and recent developments. Grass Forage Sci. 68(1):1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00891.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanine ADM, Santos EM, Dórea JRR, Dantas PADS, da Silva TC, Pereira OG. 2010. Evaluation of elephant grass silage with the addition of cassava scrapings. Rev Bras Zootec. 39(12):2611–2616. doi:10.1590/S1516-35982010001200008.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman WB, Kokoo R. 2018. Esterification for biodiesel production with a phantom catalyst: bubble mediated reactive distillation. Appl Energy. 221:28–40. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar