Robots and shocks: emerging non-herbicide weed control options for vegetable and arable cropping

References

• Agritech New Zealand. 2020. Aotearoa Agritech unleashed - driving productivity, sustainability & economic growth. Wellington: Digital Nation.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad J, Muhammad K, Ahmad I, Ahmad W, Smith ML, Smith LN, Jain DK, Wang H, Mehmood I. 2018. Visual features based boosted classification of weeds for real-time selective herbicide sprayer systems. Computers in Industry. 98:23–33. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerman E. 2015. Bosch's giant robot can punch weeds to death. Retrieved 8 August 2023 https://spectrum.ieee.org/bosch-deepfield-robotics-weed-control.
   Google Scholar
• Alcántara-de la Cruz R, Cruz-Hipolito HE, Domínguez-Valenzuela JA, De Prado R. 2021. Glyphosate ban in Mexico: potential impacts on agriculture and weed management. Pest Management Science. 77(9):3820–3831. doi:10.1002/ps.6362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alluvione F, Moretti B, Sacco D, Grignani C. 2011. EUE (energy use efficiency) of cropping systems for a sustainable agriculture. Energy. 36(7):4468–4481. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An N, Tang CS, Cheng Q, Wang DY, Shi B. 2020. Laboratory characterization of sandy soil water content during drying process using electrical resistivity/resistance method (ERM). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 79(8):4411–4427. doi:10.1007/s10064-020-01805-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasen C, Hansen L, Streibig JC. 1999. The effect of ultraviolet radiation on the fresh weight of some weeds and crops. Weed Technology. 13(3):554–560. doi:10.1017/S0890037X00046194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasen C, Saberi M, Rakhmatulin I. 2021. Weed control with laser beams using autonomous vehicles: pros and cons. FIRA 2021, FIRA.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasen C, Scholle K, Saberi M. 2022. Laser weeding with small autonomous vehicles: friends or foes? Frontiers in Agronomy. 4. doi:10.3389/fagro.2022.841086.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anken T, Latsch A. 2022. Detection rate and spraying accuracy of Ecorobotix ARA. In: Gandorfer M, Hoffmann C, El Benni N, Cockburn M, Anken T, Floto H, editors. 42nd GIL Annual Conference, Artificial Intelligence in the Agricultural and Food Sector. Bonn: Society for Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Annu K, Andrew JP, Nicholas EK, Audrey G, Steve L. 2023. Effect of crimson clover on the critical period of weed control in conservation tillage corn. Frontiers in Agronomy. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Ascard J. 1995. Effects of flame weeding on weed species at different developmental stages. Weed Research. 35(5):397. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb01636.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascard J, Hatcher PE, Melander B, Upadhyaya MK. 2007. Thermal weed control. In: Upadhyaya MK, Blackshaw RE, editors. Non-chemical weed management: principles, concepts and technology. Wallingford, UK: Cabi; p. 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Asscheman E. 2023. Carbon Robotics bags $30 m for weed control with autonomous laser bots. Retrieved 21 April 2023 https://www.futurefarming.com/tech-in-focus/field-robots/carbon-robotics-bags-30m-for-weed-control-with-autonomous-laser-bots/.
   Google Scholar
• Audsley E. 2000. Systematic procedures for calculating agricultural performance data for comparing systems. In: Weidema BP, Meeusen MJG, editors. Agricultural data for life cycle assessments. The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI); p. 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bajwa AA, Mahajan G, Chauhan BS. 2015. Nonconventional weed management strategies for modern agriculture. Weed Science. 63(4):723–747. doi:10.1614/WS-D-15-00064.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker T, Asselt K, Bontsema J, Müller J, Straten G. 2010. Systematic design of an autonomous platform for robotic weeding. Journal of Terramechanics. 47(2):63–73. doi:10.1016/j.jterra.2009.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzhaeuser J, Stroebel JMM, Koeller K, Vdi MEG. 2012. Vine-oriented hot water application for thermal weed control in viticulture. Conference: Agricultural Engineering: Land - Technik 2012: Mit Eahrung Und Innovationskraft Zu Mehr Effizienz. p. 449-454.
   Google Scholar
• Barber A. 2010. New Zealand fuel and electricity total primary energy and life cycle greenhouse gas emission factors.
   Google Scholar
• Barber A, Lucock D. 2006. Total energy indicators: Benchmarking organic, integrated and conventional sheep and beef farms 06/07.
   Google Scholar
• Barber A, Stenning H. 2022. NZ fuel and electricity – total primary energy and GHG emission factors 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer MV, Marx C, Bauer FV, Flury DM, Ripken T, Streit B. 2020. Thermal weed control technologies for conservation agriculture-a review. Weed Research. 60(4):241–250. doi:10.1111/wre.12418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawden O, Kulk J, Russell R, McCool C, English A, Dayoub F, Lehnert C, Perez T. 2017. Robot for weed species plant-specific management. Journal of Field Robotics. 34(6):1179–1199. doi:10.1002/rob.21727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter N. 2022. Lasers and electricity show weed zapping potential. Retrieved 4 February 2023 https://groundcover.grdc.com.au/weeds-pests-diseases/weeds/lasers-and-electricity-show-weed-zapping-potential.
   Google Scholar
• Beckie HJ, Flower KC, Ashworth MB. 2020. Farming without Glyphosate? Plants. 9(1):96. doi:10.3390/plants9010096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett C. 2019. Could electricity be a new weed killer? Retrieved 19 May 2022 https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/crop-production/could-electricity-be-new-weed-killer-0.
   Google Scholar
• Blasco J, Aleixos N, Roger JM, Rabatel G, Moltó E. 2002. Automation and emerging technologies. robotic weed control using machine vision. Biosystems Engineering. 83:149–157. doi:10.1006/bioe.2002.0109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomer DJ. 2017a. In search of farm robots Chapter 3: Switzerland, France and England. NZ Grower. 64-65.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomer DJ. 2017b. In search of farm robots Chapter 1: Australia. The Orchardist. 46-47.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomer DJ, Harrington KC, Ghanizadeh H, James TK. 2022. Micro electric shocks control broadleaved and grass weeds. Agronomy. 12(9). doi:10.3390/agronomy12092039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomer DJ, Posthuma LA. 2020. Engaging to change: constraints to on-farm adoption. In: Christensen CL, Horne DJ, Singh R, editors. Nutrient Management in Farmed Landscapes. Palmerston North: Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Bogue R. 2016. Robots poised to revolutionise agriculture. Industrial Robot: An International Journal. 43(5):450–456. doi:10.1108/IR-05-2016-0142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie G. 2012. Applications of microwave heating in agricultural and forestry related industries. The Development and Application of Microwave Heating. 45–78.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie G, Pasma L, Bennett H, Harris G, Woodworth J. 2007. Evaluation of microwave soil pasteurization for controlling germination of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) seeds. Plant Protection Quarterly. 22(4):150–154.
   Google Scholar
• Buddenhagen CE, Gunnarsson M, Rolston P, Chynoweth RJ, Bourdot G, James TK. 2019. Costs and risks associated with surveying the extent of herbicide resistance in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. doi:10.1080/00288233.2019.1636829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddenhagen CE, James TK, Ngow Z, Hackell DL, Rolston MP, Chynoweth RJ, Gunnarsson M, Li F, Harrington KC, Ghanizadeh H. 2021. Resistance to post-emergent herbicides is becoming common for grass weeds on New Zealand wheat and barley farms. PLoS ONE. 16(10):1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnside OC. 1993. Weed science: the step child. Weed Technology. 7(2):515–518. doi:10.1017/S0890037X00027974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon Robotics. 2023. LaserWeeder the future of weed control. In: Robotics C ed.
   Google Scholar
• Carr ER. 1994. Apparatus for killing weeds. USA patent US5600918A.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington D. 2021. Killer farm robot dispatches weeds with electric bolts. Retrieved 03 Aug 2022 10:13 NZST 2022, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/29/killer-farm-robot-dispatches-weeds-with-electric-bolts.
   Google Scholar
• Carson R. 2002. Silent spring, 40th anniversary edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 2002. ©1962.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Zhang C, Li N, Sun Z, Li W, Zhang B. 2015. Study review and analysis of high performance intra-row weeding robot. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 31(5):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen S, Sogaard HT, Kudsk P, Norremark M, Lund I, Nadimi ES, Jorgensen R. 2009. Site-specific weed control technologies. Weed Research. 49(3):233–241. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00696.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claver H. 2022. Electric weeding with high frequency electricity gives better weed control with lower energy use. Future Farming. Retrieved 14 September 2022 from https://www.futurefarming.com/crop-solutions/weed-pest-control/electric-weeding-with-high-frequency-electricity-gives-better-weed-control-with-lower-energy-use/.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman GY, Betters C, Squires C, Leon-Saval S, Walsh MJ. 2021. Low energy laser treatments control annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Frontiers in Agronomy. 2(35).
   Google Scholar
• Coleman GY, Salter W, Walsh MJ. 2022. OpenWeedLocator (OWL): an open-source, low-cost device for fallow weed detection. Scientific Reports. 12(1):170. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03858-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman GY, Stead A, Rigter M, Xu Z, Johnson DW, Brooker G, Sukkarieh S, Walsh MJ. 2019. Using energy requirements to compare the suitability of alternative methods for broadcast and site-specific weed control. Weed Technology. 33(4):633. doi:10.1017/wet.2019.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crinnion WJ. 2010. Organic foods contain higher levels of certain nutrients, lower levels of pesticides, and may provide health benefits for the consumer. Environmental Medicine. 15(Alternative Medicine Review):9.
   Google Scholar
• Danley S. 2023. McCain foods investing in regenerative farming. Food Business News, Sosland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Datta A, Knezevic SZ. 2013. Flaming as an alternative weed control method for conventional and organic agronomic crop production systems: a review. Advances in Agronomy. 118:399–428. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-405942-9.00006-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cauwer B, Bogaert S, Claerhout S, Bulcke R, Reheul D, Kim D-S. 2015. Efficacy and reduced fuel use for hot water weed control on pavements. Weed Research. 55(2):195–205. doi:10.1111/wre.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cauwer B, De Keyser A, Biesemans N, Claerhout S, Reheul D. 2016. Impact of wetting agents, time of day and periodic energy dosing strategy on the efficacy of hot water for weed control. Weed Research. 56(4):323–334. doi:10.1111/wre.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devcich DA, Pedersen IK, Petrie KJ. 2007. You eat what you are: modern health worries and the acceptance of natural and synthetic additives in functional foods. Appetite. 48(3):333–337. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diprose MF. 2016. Apparatus and method for electrically killing plants patent WO2016016627.
   Google Scholar
• Diprose MF, Benson FA. 1984. Electrical methods of killing plants. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 30:197–209. doi:10.1016/S0021-8634(84)80021-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diprose MF, Benson FA, Hackam R. 1980. Electrothermal control of weed beet and bolting sugar beet. Elektrothermische Bekämpfung von Unkrautrüben und Zucker-rübenschossern. 20(5):311.
   Google Scholar
• Diprose MF, Fletcher R, Longden PC, Champion MJ. 1985. Use of electricity to control bolters in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): a comparison of the electrothermal with chemical and mechanical cutting methods. Anwendung von Elektrizität zur Bekämpfung von Schossern in Zuckerrüben (Beta vulgaris L.):Vergleich der elektrothermischen Methode mit der chemischen und dem mechanischen Schneiden. 25(1):53.
   Google Scholar
• Diprose MF, Hackam R, Benson FA. 1978. Weed control by high voltage electric shocks. Proceedings 1978 British Crop Protection Conference - Weeds. p. 443-450.
   Google Scholar
• Dykes WG. Allis-Chalmers Corp, assignee 1977. Plant destruction using electricity. United States of America patent US4177603A.
   Google Scholar
• Ecorobotix SA. 2023. Smart spraying for ultra-localised treatments of your row crops, pastures and lawns. Retrieved Mar 21, 2023 2023, from https://ecorobotix.com/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Fennimore SA, Cutulle M. 2019. Robotic weeders can improve weed control options for specialty crops. Pest Management Science. 75(7):1767–1774. doi:10.1002/ps.5337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennimore SA, Slaughter DC, Siemens MC, Leon RG, Saber MN. 2016. Technology for automation of weed control in specialty crops. Weed Technology. 30(4):823–837. doi:10.1614/WT-D-16-00070.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Cohen DA, Cullen R, Wratten SD, Fountain J. 2009. Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace. Journal of Cleaner Production. 17(13):1195–1199. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcella F. 2009a. Potential use of abrasive air-propelled agricultural residues for weed control. Weed Research. 49(4):341–345. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00711.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcella F. 2009b. Potential of air-propelled abrasives for selective weed control. Weed Technology. 23(2):317–320. doi:10.1614/WT-08-099.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcella F. 2017. Spent coffee grounds as air-propelled abrasive grit for weed control in organic production. Weed Technology. 31(5):769–772. doi:10.1017/wet.2017.42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcella F. 2019. Weeding with walnuts - a new approach to non-chemical weed control. In: Bloomer DJ, editor. LandWISE 2019: Rethinking Best Practice. Havelock North, New Zealand: LandWISE Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Forcella F, James T, Rahman A. 2011. Post-emergence weed control through abrasion with an approved organic fertilizer. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 26(1):31–37. doi:10.1017/S1742170510000438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis GS. 1995. Management practices for minimising nitrate leaching after ploughing temporary leguminous pastures in Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 20(3):313–327. doi:10.1016/0169-7722(95)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frasconi C, Fontanelli M, Raffaelli M, Peruzzi A. 2014. Design and full realization of physical weed control (PWC) automated machine within the RHEA project. International Conference of Agricultural Engineering. Zurich. p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Froud-Williams RJ. 2017. Weed science research: past present and future perspectives. In: Hatcher PE, Froud-Williams RJ, editors. Weed Research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; p. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Galati A, Schifani G, Crescimanno M, Migliore G. 2019. “Natural wine” consumers and interest in label information: an analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 227:405–413. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath R. 2023. Agricultural and horticultural research. Retrieved 17 March 2023 https://teara.govt.nz/en/agricultural-and-horticultural-research/print.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards R. 2018. Weed suppression ability and yield impact of living mulch in cereal crops. Agriculture. 8(3):39. doi:10.3390/agriculture8030039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H. 2015. Aspects of herbicide resistance in three New Zealand weed species. Unpublished thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North. 266 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H, Buddenhagen CE, Griffiths AG, Harrington KC, Ngow Z. 2022b. Target-site and non-target site resistance mechanisms are associated with iodosulfuron resistance in Lolium perenne L. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2153875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H, Buddenhagen CE, Harrington KC, Griffiths AG, Ngow Z. 2022a. Pinoxaden resistance in Lolium perenne L. is due to both target-site and non-target-site mechanisms. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H, Harrington KC. 2017. Non-target site mechanisms of resistance to herbicides. p. 24-34.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H, Harrington KC. 2021. Herbicide resistant weeds in New Zealand: state of knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 64(4):471–482. doi:10.1080/00288233.2019.1705863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H, Harrington KC, Buddenhagen CE, James TK. 2019. The genetic inheritance of herbicide resistance in weeds. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 38(4):295–312. doi:10.1080/07352689.2019.1665769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanizadeh H, Harrington KC, Mesarich CH. 2020. The target site mutation Ile-2041-Asn is associated with resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Lolium multiflorum. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 63(3):416–429. doi:10.1080/00288233.2019.1620296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti J. 2022. Labour shortages hitting New Zealand. The Bulletin.
   Google Scholar
• Grelet G, Lang S. 2021. Regenerative agriculture in Aotearoa New Zealand: research pathways to build science-based evidence and national narratives. 59 p.
   Google Scholar
• Griepentrog HW, Nørremark M, Soriano JF. 2006. Close-to-crop thermal weed control using a CO2 laser. CIGR World Congress: Agricultural Engineering for a Better World. Bonn, Germany, CIGR.
   Google Scholar
• Hageman KJ, Aebig CHF, Luong KH, Kaserzon SL, Wong CS, Reeks T, Greenwood M, Macaulay S, Matthaei CD. 2019. Current-use pesticides in New Zealand streams: comparing results from grab samples and three types of passive samplers. Environmental Pollution. 254(Pt A):112973. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.112973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hague T, Tillett ND. 2001. A bandpass filter-based approach to crop row location and tracking. Mechatronics. 11(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/S0957-4158(00)00003-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington KC, Ghanizadeh H, James TK, Parker MD. 2016. Strategies to manage the evolution of glyphosate resistance in New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection. 69:252–257. doi:10.30843/nzpp.2016.69.5944.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey J, Reid D, Brown F, Penny H. 2019. Weed away final report.
   Google Scholar
• Heap I. 2022. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds Friday, August 26, 2022 ed. online.
   Google Scholar
• Heisel T, Schou J, Christensen S, Andreasen C. 2001. Cutting weeds with a CO2 laser. Weed Research. 41:19–21. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2001.00212.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander M, Saloniemi I, Omacini M, Druille M, Salminen JP, Saikkonen K. 2018. Glyphosate decreases mycorrhizal colonization and affects plant-soil feedback. Science of the Total Environment. 642:285–291. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsel ZR, Pimentel D. 2007. Energy in pesticide production and use. Encyclopedia of pest management. 2:157–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hoek AC, Pearson D, James SW, Lawrence MA, Friel S. 2017. Shrinking the food-print: a qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite. 108:117–131. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoschle I. 1984. Effect of microwaves on higher plants and soil organisms in respect of their use in plant protection. Plits. 2(2):134.
   Google Scholar
• Invest Auckland. 2023. New Zealand’s ecosystem approach to agritech innovation. Invest Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Jabran K, Chauhan BS. 2018. Chapter 1 - overview and significance of non-chemical weed control. In: Jabran K, Chauhan BS, editors. Non-Chemical Weed Control. Academic Press; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• James TK, Rahman A, Mellsop JM. 2000. Weed competition in maize crop under different timings for post-emergence weed control. New Zealand Plant Protection. 53:269–272. doi:10.30843/nzpp.2000.53.3706.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Krall JM, Delaney RH, Pochop LO. 1989. Response of monocot and dicot weed species to fresnel lens concentrated solar radiation. Weed Science. 37(6):797. doi:10.1017/S0043174500072866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judaev IV, Brenina TP. 2008. The definition of electro impulses used in weed control. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade. 51.
   Google Scholar
• Jun I, Feng Z, Avanasi R, Brain RA, Prosperi M, Bian J. 2023. Evaluating the perceptions of pesticide use, safety, and regulation and identifying common pesticide-related topics on Twitter. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 00.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacan K, Cakir E, Aygun I. 2018. Determination of possibilities of microwave application for weed control. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 20(5):966–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaierle S, Marx C, Rath T, Hustedt M. 2013. Find and irradiate - lasers used for weed control. Laser Technik Journal. 10(3):44–47. doi:10.1002/latj.201390038.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman KR, Schaffner LW. 1980. Energy requirements and economic analysis of electrical weed control. 72-85 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman KR, Schaffner LW. 1982. Energy and economics of electrical weed control. Transactions of the ASAE. 25(2):297–0300. doi:10.13031/2013.33523.
   Google Scholar
• Keller M, Gantoli G, Mohring J, Gutjahr C, Gerhards R, Rueda-Ayala V. 2014. Integrating economics in the critical period for weed control concept in corn. Weed Science Society of America. 62:608–618. doi:10.1614/WS-D-13-00184.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Akhmedov IS. 1992. Ultra-violet induced changes of the plant cell membrance potential. Soviet Plant Physiology. 39(1):7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin T. 2021. 28 Jan 2023 16:48 Agriculturists demand pathway to get through labour shortage. RNZ News.
   Google Scholar
• Knezevic SZ, Datta A. 2017. The critical period for weed control: revisiting data analysis. Weed Science. 63(SP1):188–202. doi:10.1614/WS-D-14-00035.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knezevic SZ, Fennimore SA, Datta A. 2016. Thermal weed control. p. 463-468.
   Google Scholar
• Koch S, Epp A, Lohmann M, Bol GF. 2017. Pesticide residues in food: attitudes, beliefs, and misconceptions among conventional and organic consumers. Journal of Food Protection. 80(12):2083–2089. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerhuis R. 2022. Concentrated light to weed better than other technologies. Doetinchem: Future Farming.
   Google Scholar
• Korres NE, Burgos NR, Travlos I, Vurro M, Gitsopoulos TK, Varanasi VK, Duke SO, Kudsk P, Brabham C, Rouse CE, Salas-Perez R. 2019. New directions for integrated weed management: modern technologies, tools and knowledge discovery. Advances in Agronomy. 155:243–319. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2019.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari A, Gamble A, Li S, Price AJ, Korres NE. 2023. Influence of a cereal rye cover crop on the critical period for weed control in soybean. Weed Technology. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCanne CE, Lundgren JG. 2018. Regenerative agriculture: merging farming and natural resource conservation profitably. PeerJ. 6:e4428. doi:10.7717/peerj.4428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguë C, Khelifi M. 2001. Energy use and time requirements for different weeding strategies in grain corn. Canadian Biosystems Engineering / Le Genie des biosystems au Canada. 43:213–221.
   Google Scholar
• Lamichhane JR, Devos Y, Beckie HJ, Owen MDK, Tillie P, Messéan A, Kudsk P. 2017. Integrated weed management systems with herbicide-tolerant crops in the European Union: lessons learnt from home and abroad. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 37(4):459–475. doi:10.1080/07388551.2016.1180588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lati RN, Rosenfeld L, David IB, Bechar A. 2021. Power on! low-energy electrophysical treatment is an effective new weed control approach. Pest Management Science. doi:10.1002/ps.6451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach H. 2005. Gardens without weeds? Pre-European Maori gardens and inadvertent introductions. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 43(1):271–284. doi:10.1080/0028825X.2005.9512954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnhoff EA, Neher P, Indacochea A, Beck L. 2022. Electricity as an effective weed control tool in non-crop areas. Weed Research. doi:10.1111/wre.12523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Al-Sarayreh M, Irie K, Hackell D, Bourdot G, Reis MM, Ghamkhar K. 2021. Identification of weeds based on hyperspectral imaging and machine learning. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11:611622. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.611622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lottes P, Behley J, Chebrolu N, Milioto A, Stachniss C. 2018. Joint stem detection and crop-weed classification for plant-specific treatment in precision farming. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). p. 8233-8238.
   Google Scholar
• Lysakov AA, Masyutina GV, Rostova AT, Eliseeva AA, Lubentsov VF. 2021. Development of a weeding robot with tubular linear electric motors. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 852(1):012063. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/852/1/012063.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson MK, Arvola A, Hursti U-KK, Åberg L, Sjödén P-O. 2003. Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite. 40(2):109–117. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00002-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malewar A. 2021. New agricultural robots kill individual weeds with electricity. Retrieved 3-08-2022, updated JUNE 11, 2021 18:23 IST: https://www.inceptivemind.com/small-robot-company-tom-dick-kill-individual-weeds-electricity/19481/.
   Google Scholar
• Martelloni L, Frasconi C, Sportelli M, Fontanelli M, Raffaelli M, Peruzzi A. 2021. Hot foam and hot water for weed control: a comparison. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 52(3):1–10. doi:10.4081/jae.2021.1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews JM, Llewellyn R, Powles S, Reeves T. 1996. Integrated weed management for the control of herbicide resistant annual ryegrass. In: Michalk DL, Pratley JE, editors. Agronomy - science with its sleeves rolled up. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Agronomy Conference. Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia; p. 417–420.
   Google Scholar
• McCain Foods. 2023. McCain's regenerative agriculture framework. McCain Foods.
   Google Scholar
• McCool C, Beattie J, Firn J, Lehnert C, Kulk J, Bawden O, Russell R, Perez T. 2018. Efficacy of mechanical weeding tools: a study into alternative weed management strategies enabled by robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Robotics and Automation Letters. 2:1184.
   Google Scholar
• McErlich AF, Boydston RA. 2014. Current state of weed management in organic and conventional cropping systems. In: Young SL, Pierce FJ, editors. Automation: the future of weed control in cropping systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Melander B, Liebman M, Davis AS, Gallandt ER, Bàrberi P, Moonen A-C, Rasmussen J, van der Weide R, Vidotto F. 2017. Non-chemical weed management. In: Hatcher PE, Froud-Williams RJ, editors. Weed research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; p. 245–270.
   Google Scholar
• Melander B, Munier-Jolain N, Charles R, Wirth J, Schwarz J, van der Weide R, Bonin L, Jensen PK, Kudsk P. 2013. European perspectives on the adoption of nonchemical weed management in reduced-tillage systems for arable crops. Weed Technology. 27(1):231–240. doi:10.1614/WT-D-12-00066.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merfield CN. 2016a. Back to the future - electrothermal, systemic, weedkiller. Retrieved 7 April 2019 2019, from https://www.bhu.org.nz/future-farming-centre/information/bulletin/2016-v1/back-to-the-future-electrothermal-systemic-weedkiller.
   Google Scholar
• Merfield CN. 2016b. Robotic weeding's false dawn? ten requirements for fully autonomous mechanical weed management. Weed Research. 56(5):340–344. doi:10.1111/wre.12217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merfield CN. 2018. Integrated weed management in organic farming. In: Sarath C, Unni MR, Sabu T, editors. Organic farming: global perspectives and methods. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing; p. 117–180.
   Google Scholar
• Merfield CN. 2022. Redefining weeds for the post-herbicide era. Weed Research. 62(4):263–267. doi:10.1111/wre.12544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment.. 2020. Agritech industry transformation plan. 50 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment. 2023. Labour productivity growth since 2000 (2019). Sector situation and performance, Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Primary Industries. 2022. Regenerating aotearoa: investigating the impacts of regenerative farming practices ISBN: 978-1-99-105209-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno A, Hori Y. 1988. Destruction of living cells by pulsed high-voltage application. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 24(3):387–394. doi:10.1109/28.2886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuno A, Nagura A, Miyamoto T, Chakrabarti A, Sato T, Kimura K, Kimura T, Kobayashi M. 1993. A portable weed control device using high frequency AC voltage. IEEE Industry Applications. Toronto, ON, IEEE. p. 2000-2003.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno A, Tenma T, Yamano N. 1990. Destruction of weeds by pulsed high voltage discharges. Record of the 1990 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA, IEEE. p. 720-727.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti ML. 2021. Managing herbicide resistance with electric weed control. Retrieved 19 March 2023 https://smallgrains.wsu.edu/weeders-of-the-west/2021/03/11/managing-herbicide-resistance-with-electric-weed-control/.
   Google Scholar
• Moss SR. 2008. Weed research: is it delivering what it should? Weed Research. 48(5):389–393. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00655.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss SR. 2017. Herbicide resistance in weeds. In: Hatcher PE, Froud-Williams RJ, editors. Weed research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; p. 181–214.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy S. 2022. ‘Unviable to grow produce’ in NZ: farmers blame rising cost of energy, rates, wages and audits. Retrieved 1 March 2023 https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/country/463086/unviable-to-grow-produce-in-nz-farmers-blame-rising-cost-of-energy-rates-wages-audits.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Plant Protection Society.. 2019. Herbicide resitance in New Zealand. Retrieved 20 August 2019 http://resistance.nzpps.org/index.php?p=herbicides/introduction.
   Google Scholar
• Ngow Z, Chynoweth RJ, Gunnarsson M, Rolston P, Buddenhagen CE. 2020. A herbicide resistance risk assessment for weeds in wheat and barley crops in New Zealand. PloS one. 15(6):e0234771. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørremark M, Sørensen CG, Jorgensen RN. 2006. HortiBot: comparison of present and future phytotechnologies for weed control – part III. Portland, Oregon: ASABE.
   Google Scholar
• Norsworthy JK, Ward SM, Shaw DR, Llewellyn RS, Nichols RL, Webster TM, Bradley KW, Frisvold G, Powles SB, Burgos NR, Witt WW. 2012. Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Science. 60:31. doi:10.1614/WS-D-11-00155.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No-Till Farmer. 2022. UK's RootWave electro-weeder succeeds in independent trials. Retrieved Mar 20, 2023, updated September 13, 2022: https://www.no-tillfarmer.com/articles/11882-uks-rootwave-electro-weeder-succeeds-in-independent-trials.
   Google Scholar
• Oerke EC. 2006. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 144(1):31–43. doi:10.1017/S0021859605005708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield EE, Bradford MA, Augarten AJ, Cooley ET, Radatz AM, Radatz T, Ruark MD. 2022. Positive associations of soil organic matter and crop yields across a regional network of working farms. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 86(2):384–397. doi:10.1002/saj2.20349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira LF, Moreira AP, Silva MF. 2021. Advances in agriculture robotics: a state-of-the-art review and challenges ahead. Robotics. 10(2):52. doi:10.3390/robotics10020052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opp FW, Opp WH. 1952. Electric weed-killing apparatus. USA patent 2,591,597.
   Google Scholar
• Owen MJ, Martinez NJ, Powles SB. 2014. Multiple herbicide-resistant Lolium rigidum (annual ryegrass) now dominates across the Western Australian grain belt. Weed Research. 54(3):314–324. doi:10.1111/wre.12068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panescu D, Nerheim M, Kroll MW, Brave MA. 2017. New conducted electrical weapons: electrical safety relative to relevant standards. 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). p. 2185-2190.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos L. 2023. AI-powered robots cut out weeds while leaving crops untouched. Interesting Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Pardell R. 2021. CLAWS Concentrated light autonomous weeding and scouting. FIRA Forum. p. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJbV4snVCVY.
   Google Scholar
• Parish S. 1990. A review of non-chemical weed control techniques. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 7:117–137. doi:10.1080/01448765.1990.9754540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peden R. 2008. Farm Fencing, updated 24 November 2008: https://teara.govt.nz/en/farm-fencing/print.
   Google Scholar
• Peltzer S. 2019. Herbicide resistance. Retrieved 9 September 2019 https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/grains-research-development/herbicide-resistance.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Ruiz M, Brenes R, Rodríguez-Lizana A, Urbano JM, Slaughter DC, Forcella F. 2018. Agricultural residues are efficient abrasive tools for weed control. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 38(18). doi:10.1007/s13593-018-0494-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi A, Martelloni L, Frasconi C, Fontanelli M, Pirchio M, Raffaelli M. 2017. Machines for non-chemical intra-row weed control in narrow and wide-row crops: a review. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 48(583):57–70. doi:10.4081/jae.2017.583.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovic K. 2020. The next frontier of weeding robots. Retrieved 15 March 2023 https://www.agricultural-robotics.com/news/the-next-frontier-of-weeding-robots.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovic K. 2022. Meet ROBOTTI, the do-it-all farm robot. Retrieved 15 March 2023 https://www.agricultural-robotics.com/news/meet-robotti-the-do-it-all-farm-robot.
   Google Scholar
• Pluenneke RH, Dykes WG. Lasco Inc, 1975. Method and apparatus for using electrical current to destroy grasses and weeds. U.S. Patent 3,919,806.
   Google Scholar
• Powles S. 2014. Global herbicide resistance challenge. Pest Management Science. 70(9):1305–1305. doi:10.1002/ps.3808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A, James TK, Mortimer J. 1983. Control of atrazine-resistant fathen in maize. Proceedings of the thirty-sixth New Zealand weed and pest control conference. Hastings, NZ, NZPPS. p. 229-232.
   Google Scholar
• Rakhmatulin I, Andreasen C. 2020. A concept of a compact and inexpensive device for controlling weeds with laser beams. Agronomy. 10(10):1616. doi:10.3390/agronomy10101616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser D, Sehsah ES, Bumann O, Morhard J, Griepentrog HW. 2019. Development of an autonomous electric robot implement for intra-row weeding in vineyards. Agriculture (Switzerland). 9(18): doi:10.3390/agriculture9010018.
   Google Scholar
• Rispens C. 2022. Ekobot: New autonomous weeding experience. Retrieved 15 March 2023 https://www.agricultural-robotics.com/news/ekobot-new-autonomous-weeding-experience.
   Google Scholar
• Rona SA, Valverde B, Mendes de Souza DT, de Andrade Coutinho Filho S, Zasso Group AG. 6340. Baar (CH), assignee 2019. Weed inactivation device patent EP19152341.4A.
   Google Scholar
• Rootwave. 2019. RootWave working with small robot company to create a weed zapping autonomous robot. Retrieved 02 Aug 2021, updated 5 December 2019: https://rootwave.com/rootwave-working-with-small-robot-company-to-create-a-weed-zapping-autonomous-robot/.
   Google Scholar
• Ross DJ. 1995. Herbicide mode-of-action summary.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok T, van Henten E, Booij J, van Boheemen K, Kootstra G. 2020. Application-specific evaluation of a weed-detection algorithm for plant-specific spraying. Sensors. 20(24):7262. doi:10.3390/s20247262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge MP. 2009. Assessing demand for organic lamb using choice modelling. Unpublished Master of Commerce thesis, Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Sabzi S, Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y, García-Mateos G. 2018. A fast and accurate expert system for weed identification in potato crops using metaheuristic algorithms. Computers in Industry. 98:80–89. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saile M, Spaeth M, Gerhards R. 2022. Evaluating sensor-based mechanical weeding combined with pre- and post-emergence herbicides for integrated weed management in cereals. Agronomy. 12(6):1465. doi:10.3390/agronomy12061465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen J, Eriksson I, Haimi J. 1996. Effects of sensor-based mechanical weeding combined with pre- and post-emergence herbicides for integrated weed management in cereals terbuthylazine on soil fauna and decomposition processes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 34(2):184–189. doi:10.1006/eesa.1996.0062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorato I, Zanin G, Baldoin C, De Zanche C. 2006. Observations on the potential of microwaves for weed control. Weed Research. 46(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00484.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders JT, Greer G, Bourdôt G, Saunders C, James T, Rolando C, Monge J, Watt MS. 2017. The economic costs of weeds on productive land in New Zealand. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 15(4):380–392. doi:10.1080/14735903.2017.1334179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheible A. 1895. Apparatus for exterminating vegetation. United States of America patent 546,682.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger WH. 2022. Biogeochemical constraints on climate change mitigation through regenerative farming. Biogeochemistry. 161(1):9–17. doi:10.1007/s10533-022-00942-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider D. 2020. The electric weed-zapper renaissance - IEEE Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp AA. 1893. Vegetation exterminator. United States of America patent 492,635.
   Google Scholar
• Silverberg D. 2023. Lasers, drones and AI: the future of weeding. BBC News.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter DC, Giles DK, Downey D. 2008. Autonomous robotic weed control systems: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 61(1):63–78. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2007.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slesarev VN, Gubanova NY, Nechaev BV. 1970. Control of weeds with an electric current. Mekhanizatsiya i Elektrifikatsiya Sotsialisti-cheskogo Sel'skogo Khozyaistva. 12:45–6.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. 2022. Effects of current on human beings and livestock Pat 1: general aspects. 1 Scope. Wellington, NZ, Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2023. Table A - recruiting difficulty by industry (Annual-Aug). Infoshare. 25 March 2022 10:45am ed. Wellington, NZ, Statistics New Zealand. p. https://infoshare.stats.govt.nz/SelectVariables.aspx?pxID=f9823c56-943d-4b8e-ab4b-dd612bb7320f.
   Google Scholar
• Stringleman H, Peden R. 2015. Sheep farming. Retrieved 15 Mar 2023, updated 1 Mar 2015: https://teara.govt.nz/en/sheep-farming/print.
   Google Scholar
• SwarmFarm Robotics. 2023. Unlock integrated agronomy. Retrieved 21 March 2023 https://www.swarmfarm.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas S. 2022. Regenerative agriculture doesn't have to be contentious. Upstream Ag Insights, Upstream Ag Insights.
   Google Scholar
• Tillett ND, Hague T, Miles SJ. 2002. Inter-row vision guidance for mechanical weed control in sugar beet. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 33(3):163–177. doi:10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00005-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tørresen KS, Karlsson LM, Gonzalez-Andujar JL. 2017. Seed biology and population dynamics. Weed Research. 85–113. doi:10.1002/9781119380702.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Verdant Robotics. 2022. Agriculture's most flexible farm tool. Retrieved 6 April 2022 https://www.verdantrobotics.com/technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vigneault C, Benoit DL. 2001. Electrical weed control: theory and applications. In: Vincent C, Panneton B, Fleurat-Lessard F, editors. Physical Control Methods in Plant Protection. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Vigneault C, Benoit DL, McLaughlin NB. 1990. Energy aspects of weed electrocution. Reviews of Weed Science. 5:15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Vleeshouwers LM, Kropff MJ. 2000. Modelling field emergence patterns in arable weeds. The New Phytologist. 148(3):445–457. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00773.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh MJ, Powles SB. 2014. Management of herbicide resistance in wheat cropping systems: learning from the Australian experience. Pest Management Science. 70(9):1324–1328. doi:10.1002/ps.3704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang A, Zhang W, Wei X. 2019. A review on weed detection using ground-based machine vision and image processing techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 158:226–240. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward J. 2023. AI meets agriculture with new farm machines to kill weeds and harvest crops. In: NBC ed. Nightly News. USA. p. https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/ai-meets-agriculture-with-new-farm-machines-to-kill-weeds-and-harvest-crops-180937797700.
   Google Scholar
• Wayland J, Merkle M, Davis F, Menges RM, Robinson R. 1975. Control of weeds with UHF elecromagnetic fields. Weed Research. 15:1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1975.tb01088.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh JP, Bulson HAJ, Stopes CE, Froud-Williams RJ, Murdoch AJ. 1999. The critical weed-free period in organically-grown winter wheat. Annals of Applied Biology. 134(3):315–320. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb05270.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook AS, Bhaskar V, DiTommaso A. 2022. Weed control and community composition in living mulch systems. Weed Research. 62(1):12–23. doi:10.1111/wre.12511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatley TL, Wayland JR, Davis FS, Merkle MG. 1973. Effects of soil moisture on phytotoxicity of microwave fields. Proceedings 26th Annual Meeting Southern Weed Science Society, 389-389.
   Google Scholar
• William WD. 2007. Control of both winter annual and summer annual weeds in no-till corn with between-row mowing systems. Weed Technology. 21(3):591. doi:10.1614/WT-05-141.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RG, Young BG, Matthews JL, Weller SC, Johnson WG, Jordan DL, Owen MDK, Dixon PM, Shaw DR. 2011. Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 4: weed management practices and effects on weed populations and soil seedbanks. Pest Management Science. 67:771–780. doi:10.1002/ps.2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wöltjen C, Haferkamp H, Rath T, Herzog D. 2008. Plant growth depression by selective irradiation of the meristem with CO2 and diode lasers. Biosystems Engineering. 101(3):316–324. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooliscroft B, Ganglmair-Wooliscroft A, Noone A. 2014. The hierarchy of ethical consumption behavior: the case of New Zealand. Journal of Macromarketing. 34(1):57–72. doi:10.1177/0276146713508560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortman SE, Forcella F, Humburg D, Clay SA. 2018. Abrasive weeding: a new tool for weed management in organic agriculture. https://articles.extension.org/pages/74528/abrasive-weeding:-a-new-tool-for-weed-management-in-organic-agriculture, eXtension.org.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Aravecchia S, Lottes P, Stachniss C, Pradalier C. 2020. Robotic weed control using automated weed and crop classification. Journal of Field Robotics. 37(1). doi:10.1002/rob.21938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Ge YY, Liang YL, Blackmore S. 2017. Development of a prototype robot and fast path-planning algorithm for static laser weeding. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 142:494–503. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SL, Pitla SK, Van Evert FK, Schueller JK, Pierce FJ, Liebman M. 2017. Moving integrated weed management from low level to a truly integrated and highly specific weed management system using advanced technologies. Weed Research. 57(1):1–5. doi:10.1111/wre.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudaev IV, Daus Y, Kokurin R, Prokofyev PV, Gamaga V, Armenyanov N. 2019. Electro-impulse irreversible plant tissue damage as highly efficient agricultural technology. Advanced Agro-Engineering Technologies for Rural Business Development. Hershey, PA, USA, IGI Global. p. 396-430.
   Google Scholar
• Zimdahl RL. 1995. Weed science in sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 10(3):138–142. doi:10.1017/S0889189300006329.
   Google Scholar