Residual methane emissions in grazing lactating dairy cows

References

• Bird-Gardiner T, Arthur PF, Barchia IM, Donoghue KA, Herd RM. 2017. Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 95:4391–4398. doi:10.2527/jas2017.1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaby L, Peyraud J-L, Bouttier A, Peccatte J-R. 1998. Effet d’une réduction simultanée de la fertilisation azotée et du chargement sur les performances des vaches laitières et la valorisation du pâturage. Annales de Zootechnie. 47:17–39. doi:10.1051/animres:19980102.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon P, Stakelum G. 1989. Herbage and dosed alkanes as a grass measurement technique for dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research. 28:104.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Ireland's national inventory report, 2022. Dublin, Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2009. How to feed the world in 2050 (High-Level Expert Forum, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Flay HE, Kuhn-Sherlock B, Macdonald KA, Camara M, Lopez-Villalobos N, Donaghy DJ, Roche JR. 2019. Hot topic: selecting cattle for low residual feed intake did not affect daily methane production but increased methane yield. Journal of Dairy Science. 102:2708–2713. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herd RM, Arthur PF, Donoghue KA, Bird SH, Bird-Gardiner T, Hegarty RS. 2014. Measures of methane production and their phenotypic relationships with dry matter intake, growth and body composition traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 92:5267–5274. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron J, O’Brien D, Shalloo L. 2021. Life cycle assessment of pasture-based dairy production systems: current and future performance. Journal of Dairy Science. 105:5849–5869. doi:10.3168/jds.2021-21499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker A, Green P, Waghorn GC, van der Weerden T, Pacheco D, de Klein C. 2018. A meta-analysis comparing four measurement methods to determine the relationship between methane emissions and dry matter intake in New Zealand dairy cattle. Animal Production Science. 60:96–101. doi:10.1071/AN18573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løvendahl P, Difford GF, Li B, Chagunda MGG, Huhtanen P, Lidauer MH, Lassen J, Lund P. 2018. Review: selecting for improved feed efficiency and reduced methane emissions in dairy cattle. Animal. 12:336–349. doi:10.1017/S1751731118002276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowman BG, Scott NA. 1976. Condition scoring for cattle. Edinburgh, UK: East of Scotland College of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Manafiazer G, Zimmerman S, Basarab J. 2016. Repeatability and variability of short-term spot measurement of methane and carbon dioxide emissions from beef cattle using GreenFeed emissions monitoring system. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 97(1):118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes RW, Lamb CS, Colgrove PM. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science. 107:161–170. doi:10.1017/S0021859600066910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry for Primary Industries. 2013. Evaluation of the energy equations used by the National Enteric Methane Inventory. Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. 2022. New Zealand's Greenhuse Gas Inventory 1990-2020. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Molano G, Clark H. 2008. The effect of level of intake and forage quality on methane production in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 48:219–222. doi:10.1071/EA07253.
   Google Scholar
• O'Niell BF, Deighton MH, O'Loughlin BM, Galvin N, O'Donovan M, Lewis E. 2012. The effects of supplementing grazing dairy cows with partial mixed ration on enteric methane emissions and milk production during mid to late lactation. Journal of Dairy Science. 95:6582–6590. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-5257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Niell BF, Deighton MH, O'Loughlin BM, Mulligan FJ, Boland TM, O'Donovan M, Lewis E. 2011. Effects of a perennial rygrass diet or total mixed ration diet offered to spring-calving Holstein Friesian dairy cows on methane emissions, dry matter intake, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science. 94:1941–1951. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray DK, West PC, Clark M, Gerber JS, Prishchepov AV, Chatterjee S. 2019. Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLOS. 14:e0217148.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata M, Terada F. 2010. Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants. Animal Science Journal. 81:2–10. doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaunja LO, Baevre L, Junkkarinen L, Pederson J, Setala J. 1991. A Nordic proposal for an energy correlated milk (ECM) formula, 156–157 in Proceedings of Performance Recording of Animals: State of the art. EAAP publication.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PE, Waters SM, Kenny DA, Kirwan SE, Conroy S, Kelly AK. 2021. Effect of divergence in residual methane emissions on feed intake and efficiency, growth and cascass performance, and incides of rumen fermentation and methane emissions in finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 99:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starsmore K, Lopez-Villalobos N, Lahart B, Egan M, Burke J, Shalloo L. In Review. Animal factors that affect enteric methane production measured using the GreenFeed monitoring system in grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science (In Review).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2016. Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris, France: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk M, Morley T, Rau ML, Saghai Y. 2021. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nature Food. 2(7):494–501. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS. 2011. Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 166:291–301. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waghorn GC, Jonker A, Macdonald KA. 2016. Measuring methane from grazing dairy cows using GreenFeed. Animal Production Science. 56(3):252. doi:10.1071/AN15491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins GR, Shook GE. 1987. A lactation measure of somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science. 70:266–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wims CM, Deighton MH, Lewis E, O'Loughlin BM, Delaby L, Boland TM, O'Donovan M. 2010. Effect of pregrazing herbage mass on methane production, dry matter intake and milk production of grazing dairy cows during mid season period. Journal of Dairy Science. 93:4976–4985. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan T, Mayne CS, Gordon FG, Porter MG, Agnew RE, Patterson DC, Ferris CP, Kilpatrick DJ. 2010. Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improved efficiency of energy utilisation and productivity in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 93:2630–2638. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar