Understanding the diversity and phylogenetic placements of New Zealand amphipods within a global context

References

• Albano MJ, Rumbold C, Chiesa IL, Vazquez G, Spivak ED, Obenat SM. 2019. DNA barcode, taxonomic and ecological notes for the identification of the invasive amphipod Monocorophium acherusicum (costa, 1851). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 53(1):15–32. doi:10.1080/00288330.2018.1469514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arfianti T, Wilson S, Costello MJ. 2018. Progress in the discovery of amphipod crustaceans. PeerJ 6. e5187. doi:10.7717/peerj.5187.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard JL. 1974. Gammaridean Amphipoda of Australia, part II. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 139:1–148. doi:10.5479/si.00810282.139.
   Google Scholar
• Brhier F, Vonk R, Jaume D. 2010. First South American phreatogammarid, with comments on the arrangement of coxal and sternal gills, and on the biramous condition of the seventh pereiopod in amphipods. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 30(3):503–520. doi:10.1651/09-3221.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 17(4):540–552. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 [accessed 2020 Jan 17]. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article-abstract/17/4/540/1127654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman MA. 2002. Australasian species of Paracorophium (Crustacea: Amphipoda): the separate identities of P. excavatum (thomson, 1884) and P. brisbanensis sp. nov. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 32(2):203–228. doi:10.1080/03014223.2002.9517692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman MA. 2003. A revision of the freshwater amphipod genus Phreatogammarus in New Zealand. part 1: a re-description of P. helmsii Chilton, 1918 and a new species from Northland. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 33(3):633–661. doi:10.1080/03014223.2003.9517750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman MA. 2004. A revision of the Phreatogammaridae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of New Zealand. part 2: Phreatogammarus fragilis and P. propinquus. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 34(1):59–79. doi:10.1080/03014223.2004.9517763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman MA, Lewis MH, Winterbourn MJ. 2011. Guide to the freshwater Crustacea of New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton C. 1882. On some subterranean Crustacea. Trans Proc New Zeal Inst. 14:174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton C. 1918. Some New Zealand Amphipoda belonging to the genus Phreatogammarus. Journal of Zoological Research. 3:81-86.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton C. 1920. The occurrence in the Philippine islands of the freshwater amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis (G.M. thomson). Philipp J Sci. 17:513–514.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton C. 1921. Some New Zealand Amphipoda. Trans Proc New Zeal Inst. 54:229–234.
   Google Scholar
• Costa A. 1853. Relazione sulla memoria del Dottor Achille Costa, di Ricerche su' Crostacei Amfipodi del Regno di Napoli. Rendiconti della Societa Reale Borbonica, Accademia delle Scienze, new series. 2:167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Copilaş-Ciocianu D, Borko Š, Fišer C. 2020. The late blooming amphipods: global change promoted post-jurassic ecological radiation despite palaeozoic origin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 143:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copilaş-Ciocianu D, Sidorov D, Gontcharov A. 2019. Adrift across tectonic plates: molecular phylogenetics supports the ancient Laurasian origin of old limnic crangonyctid amphipods. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 19:191–207.doi:10.1007/s13127-019-00401-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts ADM, Dodgshun TJ. 2007. The nature and extent of organisms in vessel sea-chests: a protected mechanism for marine bioinvasions. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 54(7):875–886. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana JD. 1852. Conspectus crustaceorum quae in orbis terrarum circumnavigatione, Carolo Wikles e classe Reipublicae Faederatae Duce, lexit et descripsit Jacobus D.Dana, Pars III (Amphipoda n°1). Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 2:201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Dana JD. 1853. United States exploring expedition. Philadelphia (PA): Sherman C. p. 691–1618.
   Google Scholar
• Englisch U, Coleman CO, Wägele JW. 2003. First observations on the phylogeny of the families Gammaridae, Crangonyctidae, Melitidae, Niphargidae, Megaluropidae and Oedicerotidae (Amphipoda, Crustacea), using small subunit rDNA gene sequences. Journal of Natural History. 37(20):2461–2486. doi:10.1080/00222930210144352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick GD. 1978. Plankton swarms and their predators at the Snares Islands (note). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 12(2):223–224. doi:10.1080/00288330.1978.9515746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick GD. 2001. The freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) of New Zealand: a review. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 31(2):341–363. doi:10.1080/03014223.2001.9517658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick GD. 2006. Ringanui, a new genus of stygobitic amphipod from New Zealand (Amphipoda: Gammaridea: Paraleptamphopidae). Zootaxa. 1148:1–25. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1148.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick GD, Greenwood MJ, Hogg ID, Meyer SJ. 2021. High diversity and local endemism in Aotearoa New Zealand’s groundwater crustacean fauna. Ecology and Evolution. 11(22):15664–15682. doi:10.1002/ece3.8220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fišer C, Zagmajster M, Ferreira RL. 2013. Two new amphipod families recorded in South America shed light on an old biogeographical enigma. Systematics and Biodiversity. 11(2):117–139. doi:10.1080/14772000.2013.788579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 3(5):294–299. doi:10.1071/ZO9660275. [accessed 2020 Mar 16]. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10012534632/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gollasch S. 2002. The importance of ship hull fouling as a vector of species introductions into the North Sea. Biofouling. 18(2):105–121. doi:10.1080/08927010290011361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosso LE, Peralta M. 2009. A new Paraleptamphopidae (Custacea, Amphipoda) in the burrow of Virilastacus rucapihuelensis (Parastacidae) and surrounding peat bogs. Rudolphia macrodactylus n. gen., n. sp. from Southern South America. Zootaxa. 2243:40–52. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2243.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen HJ. 1903. The Ingolfiellidae, fam. n., a new type of Amphipoda. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology. 29:117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Havermans C, Auel H, Hagen W, Held C, Ensor NS, Tarling G A.. 2019. Advances in Marine Biology. Vol. Vol. 82. London, UK: Elsevier. Chapter 2, Predatory zooplankton on the move: Themisto amphipods in high-latitude marine pelagic food webs; p. 51–92.
   Google Scholar
• Havermans C, Nagy ZT, Sonet G, De Broyer C, Martin P. 2010. Incongruence between molecular phylogeny and morphological classification in amphipod crustaceans: a case study of Antarctic lysianassoids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 55(1):202–209. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.10.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg ID, Stevens MI, Schnabel KE, Chapman MA. 2006. Deeply divergent lineages of the widespread New Zealand amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis revealed using allozyme and mitochondrial DNA analyses. Freshwater Biology. 51(2):236–248. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01491.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton T, Lowry J, De Broyer C, Bellan-Santini D, Coleman CO, Corbari L, Costello MJ, Daneliya M, Dauvin J-C, Fišer C, et al. 2021. World Amphipoda Database. Melitidae Bousfield. 1973. Accessed at: http://marinespecies.org/amphipoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=101397 on 2022-08-12
   Google Scholar
• Hou Z, Fu J, Li S. 2007. A molecular phylogeny of the genus Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 45(2):596–611. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Z, Sket B. 2016. A review of Gammaridae (Crustacea: Amphipoda): the family extent, its evolutionary history, and taxonomic redefinition of genera. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 176(2):323–348. doi:10.1111/zoj.12318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannilli V, Ruffo S. 2007. A new genus and species of Phreatogammaridae (Caledonietta maryae n. gen. n. sp.) from New Caledonia (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Boll del Mus Civ di Stor Nat di Verona. 31:23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis G, Gust N, Fitridge I, Floerl O, Woods C, Hayden B, Fenwick G.. 2006. Port of Tauranga: baseline survey for non-indigenous marine species (Research Project ZBS2000/04). NIWA, NZ. Biosecurity New Zealand Technical Paper No:2005/05.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. Modelfinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods. 14(6):587–589. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman GS. 1979. Revision of the genus Paracorophium stebb. with description of P. chelatum n. sp. and genus Chaetocorophium n. gen. (Fam. Corophiidae). Glas Republickog Zavoda za Zast Prir. 12:87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 30(4):772–780. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott B. 1975. A new species of freshwater amphipod, Paracalliope larai, (family Eusiridae) from Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania. 109:39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Knox MA, Hogg ID, Pilditch CA. 2011. The role of vicariance and dispersal on New Zealand’s estuarine biodiversity: The case of Paracorophium (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 103(4):863–874. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01675.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latreille PA. 1802. Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Leach WE. 1814. Crustaceology. Edinburgh Encycl. 7:383–434.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Myers AA. 2009. Benthic Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) of the Great Barrier Reef. Zootaxa. 2260(1):16. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2260.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Myers AA. 2012. New, mainly Southern Hemisphere, freshwater families of Amphipoda (Crustacea), together with a description of the first freshwater calliopiid, Lutriwita bradburyi gen. nov. et sp. nov. Zootaxa. 3499:27–45. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3499.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Myers AA. 2013. A phylogeny and classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. Crustacea: Amphipoda). Zootaxa. 3610(1):1–80. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Myers AA. 2017. A phylogeny and classification of the Amphipoda with the establishment of the new order Ingolfiellida (Crustacea: Peracarida). Zootaxa. 4265(1):1–89. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4265.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Myers AA. 2019. New genera of Talitridae in the revised superfamily Talitroidea Bulycheva 1957 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Senticaudata). Zootaxa. 4553(1):1–100. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4553.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald KS, Yampolsky L, Duffy JE. 2005. Molecular and morphological evolution of the amphipod radiation of Lake Baikal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 35(2):323–343. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 gateway computing environments workshop (GCE). ieee. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Milne Edwards H. 1830. Extrait de recherches pour server a l’histoire naturelle des crustaces amphipodes. Ann des Sci Nat. 20:353–399.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 32(1):268–274. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Jorge F, Poulin R. 2020. Shared geographic histories and dispersal contribute to congruent phylogenies between amphipods and their microsporidian parasites at regional and global scales. Molecular Ecology. 29(17):3330–3345. doi:10.1111/mec.15562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Poulin R. 2020. Widespread Torix Rickettsia in New Zealand amphipods and the use of blocking primers to rescue host COI sequences. Scientific Reports. 10:16842. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73986-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard M, Huelsenbeck J. 2012. Mrbayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 61(3):539–542. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [accessed 2020 Jan 17]. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article-abstract/61/3/539/1674894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel KE, Hogg ID, Chapman MA. 2000. Population genetic structures of two New Zealand corophiid amphipods and the presence of morphologically cryptic species: implications for the conservation of diversity. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 34(4):637–644. doi:10.1080/00288330.2000.9516964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens MI, Hogg ID. 2004. Population genetic structure of New Zealand’s endemic corophiid amphipods: evidence for allopatric speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 81(1):119–133. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00270.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens MI, Hogg ID, Chapman MA. 2002. The corophiid amphipods of Tauranga harbour, New Zealand: evidence of an Australian crustacean invader. Hydrobiologia. 474:147–154. doi:10.1023/A:1016575519015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland DL. 2006. Phylogeography and ecology of New Zealand freshwater Amphipoda (Paracalliope, Paraleptamphopus and Phreatogammarus) [dissertation]. Hamilton, New Zealand: The University of Waikato.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson. 1884. Descriptions of new crustaceans. Trans Proc New Zeal Inst. 16:234–240.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson GM. 1879. New Zealand Crustacea, with descriptions of new species. Trans Proc New Zeal Inst. 11:230–248.
   Google Scholar
• Väinölä R, Witt JDS, Grabowski M, Bradbury JH, Jazdzewski K, Sket B. 2008. Global diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 595(1):241–255. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9020-6.
   Google Scholar
• Varela C. 1983. Anfípodos de las playas de arena del sur de Chile (bahía de maiquillahue, valdivia). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 18(1):25–52. doi:10.1080/01650528309360617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheye ML, Martin P, Backeljau T, D’Acoz C. 2016. DNA analyses reveal abundant homoplasy in taxonomically important morphological characters of Eusiroidea (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Zoologica Scripta. 45(3):300–321. doi:10.1111/zsc.12153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongkamhaeng K, Nabhitabhata J, Towatana P. 2015. Corophiine amphipods of the genera Chelicorophium and Paracorophium from the lower Gulf of Thailand (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Corophiidae, Corophiinae). Zookeys. 505:35–50. doi:10.3897/zookeys.505.9751.
   Google Scholar