62
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Blending in or Being Co-Opted: Reflecting on an Internship-Cum-Field Work at a New Town Government in China

Pages 239-247 | Received 16 Oct 2022, Accepted 23 Jul 2023, Published online: 28 Sep 2023

Literature Cited

  • Ali, R. 2015. Rethinking representation: Negotiating positionality, power and space in the field. Gender, Place & Culture 22 (6):783–800. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2014.917278.
  • Althusser, L. 1971. Lenin and philosophy and other essays, trans. B. Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Bachmann, V. 2011. Participating and observing: Positionality and fieldwork relations during Kenya’s post-election crisis. Area 43 (3):362–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00985.x.
  • Billo, E., and N. Hiemstra. 2013. Mediating messiness: Expanding ideas of flexibility, reflexivity, and embodiment in fieldwork. Gender, Place & Culture 20 (3):313–28. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2012.674929.
  • Bourlessas, P. 2021. Janus in the viscous field: A reflexive account on researching homelessness through institutionalised spaces of care. Area 53 (1):4–12. doi: 10.1111/area.12592.
  • Caretta, M. A. 2015. East African hydropatriarchies: An analysis of changing waterscapes in smallholder irrigation farming. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Human Geography.
  • Caretta, M. A., and J. C. Jokinen. 2017. Conflating privilege and vulnerability: A reflexive analysis of emotions and positionality in postgraduate fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 69 (2):275–83. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1252268.
  • Chen, Y. 2017. Doing fieldwork the Chinese way: A returning researcher’s insider/outsider status in her home town. Area 49 (2):185–91.
  • Crossa, V. 2015. Relational positionality: Conceptualizing research, power, and the everyday politics of neoliberalization in Mexico City. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 11 (1):110–32.
  • Cuomo, D., and V. A. Massaro. 2016. Boundary-making in feminist research: New methodologies for “intimate insiders.” Gender, Place & Culture 23 (1):94–106. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2014.939157.
  • Dawney, L. 2013. The interruption: Investigating subjectivation and affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (4):628–44. doi: 10.1068/d9712.
  • DeLyser, D. 2001. “Do you really live here?” Thoughts on insider research. Geographical Review 91 (1–2):441–53. doi: 10.2307/3250847.
  • England, K. V. L. 1994. Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):80–89. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x.
  • Fisher, K. T. 2015. Positionality, subjectivity, and race in transnational and transcultural geographical research. Gender, Place & Culture 22 (4):456–73. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2013.879097.
  • Foucault, M. 1997. On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In Michel Foucault/ethics: Subjectivity and truth, ed. P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley, 253–80. New York: The New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2000a. Governmentality. In Michel Foucault/power, ed. J. D. Faubion, trans. R. Hurley, 201–22. New York: The New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2000b. The political technology of individuals. In Michel Foucault/power, ed. J. D. Faubion, trans. R. Hurley, 403–17. New York: The New Press.
  • Hall, S. M. 2009. “Private life” and “work life”: Difficulties and dilemmas when making and maintaining friendships with ethnographic participants. Area 41 (3):263–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00880.x.
  • Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
  • Harvey, D. 1985. The urbanization of capital. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Katz, C. 1994. Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):67–72. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x.
  • McArdle, R. 2022. Flexible methodologies: A case for approaching research with fluidity. The Professional Geographer 74 (4):620–27. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2021.2023593.
  • McFarlane, C. 2011. Assemblage and critical urbanism. City 15 (2):204–24. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.568715.
  • Mountz, A. 2007. Smoke and mirrors: An ethnography of the state. In Politics and practice in economic geography, ed. E. Sheppard, T. Barnes, J. Peck, and A. Tickell, 38–48. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nagar, R., and F. Ali. 2003. Collaboration across borders: Moving beyond positionality. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24 (3):356–72. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00164.
  • Narayan, K. 1993. How native is a “native” anthropologist? American Anthropologist 95 (3):671–86. doi: 10.1525/aa.1993.95.3.02a00070.
  • Oglesby, E. 2010. Interviewing landed elites in post-war Guatemala. Geoforum 41 (1):23–25. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.07.008.
  • Ong, A. 1995. Women out of China: Traveling tales and traveling theories in postcolonial feminism. In Women writing culture, ed. R. Behar and D. A. Gordon, 350–72. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Parikh, A. 2020. Insider-outsider as process: Drawing as reflexive feminist methodology during fieldwork. Cultural Geographies 27 (3):437–52. doi: 10.1177/1474474019887755.
  • Pile, S. 2010. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1):5–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x.
  • Pinder, D. 2010. Necessary dreaming: Uses of utopia in urban planning. In The Ashgate research companion to planning theory, ed. P. Healey and J. Hillier, 343–64. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Pløger, J. 2008. Foucault’s dispositif and the city. Planning Theory 7 (1):51–70. doi: 10.1177/1473095207085665.
  • Pow, C.-P. 2018. Building a harmonious society through greening: Ecological civilization and aesthetic governmentality in China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (3):864–83. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1373626.
  • Pow, C.-P., and H. Neo. 2013. Seeing red over green: Contesting urban sustainabilities in China. Urban Studies 50 (11):2256–74. doi: 10.1177/0042098013478239.
  • Pratt, G. 2009. Subject/subjectivity. In Dictionary of human geography, 5th ed., ed. D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts, and S. Whatmore, 728–31. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Rose, G. 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Rose, G. 1997. Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3):305–20. doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122.
  • Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Sharma, A., and A. Gupta. 2006. Bureaucracy and governmentality. In The anthropology of the state: A reader, ed. A. Sharma and A. Gupta, 165–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Sharp, J., and L. Dowler. 2011. Framing the field. In A companion to social geography, ed. V. J. D. Casino, Jr., M. Thomas, P. Cloke, and R. Panelli, 146–60. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Shepard, W. 2015. Ghost cities of China: The story of cities without people in the world’s most populated country. London: Zed Books.
  • Smith, D. E. 2005. Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 2009. The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (3):601–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x.
  • Tarrant, A. 2014. Negotiating multiple positionalities in the interview setting: Researching across gender and generational boundaries. The Professional Geographer 66 (3):493–500. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2013.805621.
  • Thrift, N. J. 2000. Afterwords. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18 (2):213–55. doi: 10.1068/d214t.
  • Valentine, G. 2007. Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer 59 (1):10–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x.
  • Wang, L. 2022. China’s new town movements since 1949: A state/space perspective. Progress in Planning 155:100514. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2020.100514.
  • Warnier, J. P. 2001. A praxeological approach to subjectivation in a material world. Journal of Material Culture 6 (1):5–24. doi: 10.1177/135918350100600101.
  • Whitson, R. 2017. Painting pictures of ourselves: Researcher subjectivity in the practice of feminist reflexivity. The Professional Geographer 69 (2):299–306. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208510.
  • Wolf, D. L. 1996. Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork, ed. D. L. Wolf, 1–55. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Wu, F. 2012. China’s eco-cities. Geoforum 43 (2):169–71. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.08.001.
  • Wu, F., and F. Zhang. 2022. Rethinking China’s urban governance: The role of the state in neighbourhoods, cities and regions. Progress in Human Geography 46 (3):775–97. doi: 10.1177/03091325211062171.
  • Yu, S. 2020. Becoming in/out of place: Doing research in Chinatown as a Chinese female geographer in the era of transnationalism. The Professional Geographer 72 (2):272–82. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2019.1633368.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.