Negotiating stakeholder solutions to complex visitor management problems: the case of traffic management in the Kruger National Park

References

• Anderson, L., Manning, R., Valliere, W., Reigner, N., Pettengill, P. & Pierce, V. 2015. Assessing the full circle trolley: implications for alternative transportation systems in the national parks. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration 33 (1): 112–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K. & Bond, N. 2016. Using a Delphi approach to identify managers’ preferences for visitor interpretation at Canterbury Cathedral World Heritage Site. Tourism Management 54: 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, J. 2007. Rethinking wicked problems. NextD Journal 10: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cribbs, T.W., Sharp, R.L. & Brownlee, M.T. 2019. Evaluating the influence of photo order on park visitors’ perceptions of crowding at Buffalo National River. Leisure Sciences 44 (5): 634–652. doi:10.1080/01490400.2019.1655685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fefer, J.P., De-Urioste Stone, S., Daigle, J. & Silka, L. 2016. Using the Delphi technique to identify key elements for effective and sustainable visitor use planning frameworks. SAGE Open. 6 (2). doi:10.1177/2158244016643141.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, S. & Harmse, A. 2014. Kruger National Park: tourism development and issues around the management of large numbers of tourists. Journal of Ecotourism 13 (1): 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., Wall-Reinius, S. & Grundén, A. 2012. The nature of nature in nature-based tourism. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 12 (4): 289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstaettner, A.M., Lee, D., Weiler, B. & Rodger, K. 2019. Visitor safety in recreational protected areas: exploring responsibility-sharing from a management perspective. Tourism Management 75: 370–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B.W. & Alford, J. 2015. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society 47 (6): 711–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2019. Category II National Park IUCN. Available from: https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areas-categories/category-ii-national-park.
   Google Scholar
• Landeta, J. 2006. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73 (5): 467–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, Y.F., Spenceley, A., Hvenegaard, G. & Buckley, R. 2018. Tourism and Visitor Management in Protected Areas. Gland, IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Zhang, J., Nian, S. & Zhang, H. 2017. Tourists’ perceptions of crowding, attractiveness, and satisfaction: a second-order structural model. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 22 (12): 1250–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, P.A., Alexander, R., Mills, M.G.L., Romañach, S. & Woodroffe, R. 2007. Wildlife viewing preferences of visitors to protected areas in South Africa: implications for the role of ecotourism in conservation. Journal of Ecotourism 6 (1): 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R.E., Anderson, L.E. & Pettengill, P. 2017. Managing outdoor recreation: case studies in the national parks. Wallingford, CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Lawson, S., Newman, P., Laven, D. & Valliere, W. 2002. Methodological issues in measuring crowding-related norms in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences 24 (3-4): 339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccool, S.F. 2006. Managing for visitor experiences in protected areas: Promising opportunities and fundamental challenges. Parks: The International Journal for Protected Areas Managers 16 (2): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mccool, S.F., Clark, R.N. & Stankey, G.H. 2007. An assessment of frameworks useful for public land recreation planning. General Technical Report, Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Mccool, S.F. & Stankey, G.H. 2003. Advancing the dialogue of visitor management: Expanding beyond the culture of technical control. Paper presented at the George Wright Society Biennial Conference, San Diego, California, 14-18 April:122-127.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, J.N., Newman, P., Taff, B.D., Shr, Y.H., Monz, C. & D’Antonio, A. 2018. If i can find a parking spot: a stated choice approach to Grand Teton National Park visitors’ transportation preferences. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, doi:10.1016/j.jort.2018.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C. & Pawlowski, S.D. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management 42 (1): 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. 2005. The Earthscan reader in sustainable agriculture. London, Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rathnayake, R.M.W. 2015. How does ‘crowding’ affect visitor satisfaction at the Horton Plains National Park in Sri Lanka? Tourism Management Perspectives 16: 129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanparks. 2015. SANParks partners SATSA on safari vehicle self-regulation project for KNP. [Press release]. 10 May. Available from: https://www.sanparks.org/about/news/?id=56360.
   Google Scholar
• Sanparks. 2018a. 5-Year Strategic Plan 2019/20–2023/24 & Annual Performance Plan 2019/20. Pretoria. Available from: https://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/about/annual_performance_plan_2019-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanparks. 2018b. Kruger National Park. Park Management Plan. For the period 2018 −2028. Pretoria. Available from: https://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/conservation/park_man/knp/knp-approved-plan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanparks. 2018c. Kruger National Park Stakeholder Participation Report 2018. Pretoria. Available from: https://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/conservation/park_man/knp/knp-stakeholder-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanparks. 2018d. Visitor Management Plan Kruger National Park. Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sanparks. 2019. Q4 Demographics April 2018 – March 2019. Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz, M. & Van Der Merwe, P. 2020. We can deal with the extra feet, but not the extra speed: the importance of providing a memorable experience in a crowded National Park. Tourism Planning & Development, doi:10.1080/21568316.2020.1850516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, J. & Svajda, J. 2017. Examining crowding among winter recreationists in Rocky Mountain National Park. Tourism Recreation Research 42 (1): 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, K.W., Koo, C.D., Koo, T.T. & Lee, H.S. 2018. An analysis on perceived crowding level reported by domestic visitors of South Korean National Parks: a multilevel ordered logit approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 23 (3): 281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumanapala, D. & Wolf, I.D. 2022. The changing face of wildlife tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to strive towards sustainability? Current Issues in Tourism 25 (3): 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarver, R., Cohen, K., Klyve, D. & Liseki, S. 2019. Sustainable safari practices: Proximity to wildlife, educational intervention, and the quality of experience. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 25: 76–83.
   Google Scholar
• UNWTO. 2023. Tourism set to return to pre-pandemic levels in some regions in 2023. [Press release]. 17 January. Available at: https://www.unwto.org/news/tourism-set-to-return-to-pre-pandemic-levels-in-some-regions-in-2023.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, B., Moore, S.A. & Moyle, D. 2013. Building and sustaining support for national parks in the 21st century: why and how to save the national park experience from extinction. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 31 (2): 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P.A. & Matthews, C. 2015. Building a culture of conservation: Research findings and research priorities on connecting people to nature in parks. Parks 21 (2): 11–24.
   Google Scholar