Deepening dialogue: White preservice teachers’ use of mode-switching to revise prior assumptions in an online synchronous class about linguistic racism

References

• Alim, H. S., & Smitherman, G. (2020, September 8). Of course Kamala Harris is articulate. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Baker-Bell, A. (2019). Dismantling anti-Black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist black language pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 59(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, A. F., & Freedman, S. W. (2004). Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beneke, M. R., & Cheatham, G. A. (2020). Teacher candidates talking (but not talking) about dis/ability and race in preschool. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X2093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P. (2023). Teacher talk that supports student thinking and talking together: Three markers of a dialogic instructional stance. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P. (2015). Digital backchannels: Giving every student a voice. Educational Leadership, 72(8), 54–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, J. S. (2018). Using backchanneling technology to facilitate dialogic discussions about literature. In E. Ortlieb, E. H. Cheek, Jr., & P. Semingson (Eds.), Best practices in teaching digital literacies (Vol. 9, pp. 75–92). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-0458201809
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility. Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. (2004). The impact of web-logs (blogs) in student perceptions of isolation and alienation in a web-based distance learning environment. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 19(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051042000280138
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, L. (2011). Writing the self: The emergence of a dialogic space. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 213–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. (2014). Developing an understanding of race talk. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(4), 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., Alvarez, H. H., & Chiu. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, B. (2014). The backchannel: Giving every student a voice in the blended mobile classroom. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/backchannel-student-voice-blended-classroom-beth-holland
   Google Scholar
• Jesson, R., Fontich, X., & Myhill, D. (2016). Creating dialogic spaces: Talk as a mediational tool in becoming a writer. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufhold, K., & Yencken, D. E. (2021). Writing groups as dialogic spaces: Negotiating multiple normative perspectives. Journal of Academic Writing, 11, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v11i1.748
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 21, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyiscott, J. ( Director). (2014). 3 ways to speak English.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. (2010). The presentation of indirectness and power in everyday life. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCES, N. C. for E. S. (2022). Impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on public and Private Elementary and Secondary Education in the United States. US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2016). Widening the theoretical lens on talk and writing pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnam, T. (2020). Provocation to dialog in a third space: Helping teachers walk toward equity pedagogy. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.569018
   Google Scholar
• Rex, L. A. (2006). Acting “Cool” and “Appropriate”: Toward a framework for considering literacy classroom interactions when race is a factor. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 275–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, L. F. (2020). Me and White supremacy: Combat racism, change the world, and become a good ancestor. Sourcebooks.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglem, R., & Haling, L. (2018). “I got confused reading it”: Using backchannels to collaboratively build meaning with texts. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 7, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v7i1.23346
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. B. (2014). Indirect challenges and provocative paraphrases: Using cultural conflict-talk practices to promote students’ dialogic participation in whole-class discussions. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(2), 141–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. B. (2018). Reframing recitation: The dialogic potential of student responses in IRE/F. Linguistics and Education, 45, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. B., Dunn, M. B., & O’Brien, J. (2023). Mode-switching as face-saving resource in a synchronous online class about linguistic racism. Linguistics & Education, 73, 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindoni, M. G. (2011). Online conversations: A sociolinguistic investigation into young adults’ use of videochats. Classroom Discourse, 2(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.614055
   Google Scholar
• Sindoni, M. G. (2021). Mode-switching in video-mediated interaction: Integrating linguistic phenomena into multimodal transcription tasks. Linguistics and Education, 62, 100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaftun, A. (2024). Can dialogic eventness be created? Theory into Practice, 63(2), 158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1991). Teachers’ classroom strategies should recognize that men and women use language differently. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 37(40), B1, B3.
   Google Scholar
• VanDerheide, J., & Dunn, M. B. (2022). Reconceptualising dialogue in virtual classrooms: Preservice teachers using dialogic and digital tools across visual, spoken, and written modes. English in Education, 57(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2022.2112398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2006). A dialogic understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6840-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2011). Toward a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: Education for the internet age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2020). Researching online dialogues: Introducing the “Chiasm” methodology. In R. Kershner, S. Hennessy, R. Wegerif, & A. Ahmed (Eds.), Research methods for educational dialogue (pp. 150–167). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2021). A dialogic approach to education for democratic values illustrated with an empirical study of the effect of Internet-mediated dialogue across cultural differences. In Moral and Political Discourses in Philosophy of Education (pp. 170–180). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. W. (2011). Resistance to classroom participation: Minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole-class discussions. Journal of Language, Identity, & Education, 10(4), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.598128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynhoff-Olsen, A., VanDerheide, J., Goff, B., & Dunn, M. B. (2018). Examining intertextual connections in written arguments: A study of student writing as social participation and response. Written Communication, 35, 58–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317739557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardi, S. (2006). The Role of the Backchannel in Collaborative Learning Environments. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2006, pp. 852–858). Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools. Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar