Opening, deepening, and widening dialogic space in argument classrooms

References

• Alexander, R. J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (1st ed.). Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2010). Argument in higher education: Improving practice through theory and research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, G. C. (1854). The county election [Painting]. National Gallery of Art. https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.110694.html
   Google Scholar
• Bouton, E., Lefstein, A., Segal, A., & Snell, J. (2024). Blurring the boundaries: Opening and sustaining dialogic spaces. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P. (2023). Teacher talk that supports student thinking and talking together: Three markers of a dialogic instructional stance. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 39, 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., Chiu, M. M., & Kong, Y. (2019). Signaling a language of possibility space: Management of a dialogic discourse modality through speculation and reasoning word usage. Linguistics and Education, 50, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 272–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., Vasquez, C. R., & Monaco, C. A. (2024). “When anybody speaks, we all need to be involved” Classroom conditions that support dialogic space. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (2nd ed.). T. and T. Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Felton, M., Crowell, A., & Liu, T. (2015). Arguing to agree: Mitigating my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue. Written Communication, 32(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315590788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G. J. (2010). Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction. The English Journal, 99(6), 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jesson, R., Fontich, X., & Myhill, D. (2016). Creating dialogic spaces: Talk as a mediational tool in becoming a writer. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosronejad, M., Ryan, M., & Weber, L. (2023). In quest for a dialogic space: A microethnographic approach to classroom interaction about writing. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 40, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M.-Y., & Ryu, S. (forthcoming). Adopting an empathizing stance in classroom argumentation: Pedagogical constructs and affordances. Research in the Teaching of English.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M.-Y., & Shanahan, E. (2023). Teaching argumentation with a dialogic stance: A case of an 11th-grade English classroom. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 43, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M.-Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 21, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lunsford, A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2018). Everything’s an argument (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, F. (2020). Reading as a transaction of meaning making. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 336–347). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C. (2016). Argumentation in history classrooms: A key path to understanding the discipline and preparing citizens. Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. NCSS.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010) . Common core state standards for English language arts.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. M., & Wilkinson, I. (2016). Widening the theoretical lens on talk and writing pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C. (2023). Introduction to the special issue “boundaries between dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory.” Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11(3), A1–A6. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.576
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., Mazón, N., Fernández, M., & Wegerif, R. (2006). Explicit reasoning, creativity and co-construction in primary school children’s collaborative activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M., & Newton, J. (2016). Teachers’ contextualization of argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1964). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, K. H., & Hicks, T. (2017). Argument in the real world: Teaching adolescents to read and write digital texts. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• VanDerheide, J., Juzwik, M., & Dunn, M. (2016). Teaching and learning argumentation in English: A dialogic approach. Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2011). Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: Education for the internet age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2018). A dialogic theory of teaching thinking. In L. Kerslate & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Theory of teaching thinking: International perspectives (pp. 89–104). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., & Yang, Y. (2011). Technology and dialogic space: Lessons from history and from the ‘Argunaut’ and ‘metafora’ projects. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL: 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (Vol.1) (pp. 312–318). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of eduation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2016). Lessons learnt from contextualising a UK teaching thinking program in a conventional Chinese classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar