Afterword: Dialogic space

References

• Békés, V., & Suedfeld, P. (2020). Integrative complexity. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 2280–2283). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• The Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). Bible Gateway.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., Vasquez, C., & Monaco, C. (2024). “When anybody speaks, we all need to be involved”: Classroom conditions that support dialogic space. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (Vol. 243). Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Imaginative Minds.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M.-Y. (2024). Opening, deepening, and widening dialogic space in argument classrooms. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2309836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolikant, Y. B. D., & Pollack, S. (2015). The dynamics of non-convergent learning with a conflicting other: Internally persuasive discourse as a framework for articulating successful collaborative learning. Cognition and Instruction, 33(4), 322–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1092972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, F. (2024). The role of provisional language in dialogic space. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plato. (1952). Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales, section 3: The standard progressive matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., Mazón, N., Fernández, M., & Wegerif, R. (2006). Explicit reasoning, creativity and co-construction in primary school children’s collaborative activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. B., Dunn, M. B., & O’Brien, J. (2024). Deepening dialogue: White preservice teachers’ use of mode-switching to revise prior assumptions in an online synchronous class about linguistic racism. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307835
   Google Scholar
• Skaftun, A. (2024). Can dialogic eventness be created? Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2023). The theory of educational technology: Towards a dialogic foundation for design (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198499
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. Language and Education Library, 12, 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, R. L., & Juzwik, M. M. (2024). Dialogic space as liminal space for love: How one elementary teacher opened doors for widening community and perspective through letter writing. Theory Into Practice, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar