The prevalence of damaged tails in New Zealand dairy cattle

References

• *Anonymous. Animal Welfare Act 1999. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1999/0142/latest/DLM49664.html (accessed 15 May 2023). New Zealand Government Printer, Wellington, NZ, 1999
   Google Scholar
• *Anonymous. Animal Welfare (Painful Husbandry Procedures) Code of Welfare. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/animals/animal-welfare/codes/all-animal-welfare-codes/ (accessed 25 January 2024). Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2005
   Google Scholar
• *Anonymous. Animal Welfare Standards for Dairy Cattle. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.americanhumane.org_app_uploads_2021_08_Dairy-2DCattle-2DFull-2DStandards.pdf&d=DwIFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cIKE-qLzzlOp7D7D9RkSpvjBA8jFMWeRKGDCHCWjGYg&m=unEblNG4psCS4cxBzYkYyT9sMZVL1XmWwkigoB_jHFMfk6Svu0ZpvMICwQUZO4ox&s=_u9c7nAry5ReXOX1i780Z15CjqUZLne_gsqnbJhZlAo&e= (accessed 16 February 2024). American Humane, Washington, DC, USA, 2020
   Google Scholar
• *Anonymous. Code of Welfare: Painful Husbandry Procedures. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/animals/animal-welfare/codes/all-animal-welfare-codes/code-of-welfare-painful-husbandry-procedures/ (accessed 25 January 2024). Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2018
   Google Scholar
• *Anonymous. NZVA Standardised Tail Scoring System. https://nzva.org.nz/assets/Policies-Guidelines-Resources/tail_scoring.pdf (accessed 25 January 2024). New Zealand Veterinary Association, Wellington, NZ, 2021a
   Google Scholar
• *Anonymous. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) Welfare Standards for Dairy Cattle. https://science.rspca.org.uk/sciencegroup/farmanimals/standards/dairycattle (accessed 6 August 2022). RSPCA, Southwater, UK, 2021b
   Google Scholar
• Beggs D, Jongman E, Hemsworth P, Fisher A. Lame cows on Australian dairy farms: a comparison of farmer-identified lameness and formal lameness scoring, and the position of lame cows within the milking order. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 1522–9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett R. The value of farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46, 46–60, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1995.tb00751.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bryan MA, Fruean SN, Moono P. Tail damage and tail scoring in NZ dairy cows – what is normal. Newsletter of the Society of Dairy Cattle Veterinarians. Pp 10–1. New Zealand Veterinary Association, Wellington, NZ, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Crossley RE, Bokkers EAM, Browne N, Sugrue K, Kennedy E, de Boer IJM, Conneely M. Assessing dairy cow welfare during the grazing and housing periods on spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms. Journal of Animal Science 99, skab093, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *De Wolf A. A welfare assessment system for dairy cows on pasture and the comparison to a welfare scoring system for cows in cubicles. Research Project Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Hewson CJ. What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 44, 496, 2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley-Worthington M. The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays. Behaviour 56, 69–114, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853976X00307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laven R, Jermy M. Measuring the torque required to cause vertebral dislocation in cattle tails. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 68, 107–11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2019.1685019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledger RA, Mellor DJ. Forensic use of the Five Domains Model for assessing suffering in cases of animal cruelty. Animals 8, 101, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main DCJ, Barker ZE, Leach KA, Bell NJ, Whay HR, Browne WJ. Sampling strategies for monitoring lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1970–8, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Matthews LR, Phipps A, Verkerk GA, Hart D, Crockford JN, Carragher JF, Harcourt RG. The effects of tail docking and trimming on milker comfort and dairy cattle health, welfare and production. Animal Behaviour and Welfare Research Centre, Hamilton, NZ, 1995
   Google Scholar
• McEachern MG, Schröder MJ, Willock J, Whitelock J, Mason R. Exploring ethical brand extensions and consumer buying behaviour: the RSPCA and the “freedom food” brand. Journal of Product & Brand Management 16, 168–77, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420710751546
   Google Scholar
• Mellor DJ, Beausoleil N. Extending the ‘Five Domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare 24, 241, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.3.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moono P, Fruean S, Hampson D, Bryan M. The frequency of tail damage amongst cows from a sample of New Zealand dairy farms participating in an animal welfare programme. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 70, 248–55, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2022.2069174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E. Tiefe Hals, Rumpf, Schwanzfaszie [Deep neck, trunk, tail fascia]. In: Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere, Band 1: Bewegungsapparat [Textbook of the Anatomy of Domestic Animals, Volume I: Musculoskeletal System]. Sixth Edtn. Pp 336–7. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Phipps A, Matthews L, Verkerk G. Tail docked dairy cattle: fly induced behaviour and adrenal responsiveness to ACTH. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 55, 61–3, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Proctor H. Animal sentience: where are we and where are we heading? Animals 2, 628–39, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani2040628
   Google Scholar
• *Sergeant E. Epitools – Epidemiological Calculators. http://epitools.ausvet.com.au (accessed 10 May 2023). Ausvet, Fremantle, Australia, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo A, Muniesa A, Ferreira C, de Blas I. New method to estimate the sample size for calculation of a proportion assuming binomial distribution. Research in Veterinary Science 95, 405–9, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Os JM, Winckler C, Trieb J, Matarazzo SV, Lehenbauer TW, Champagne JD, Tucker CB. Reliability of sampling strategies for measuring dairy cattle welfare on commercial farms. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 1495–504, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurbrigg K, Kelton D, Anderson N, Millman S. Tie stall design and its relationship to lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 Ontario dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 3201, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73003-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Non-peer-reviewed
   Google Scholar