Addressing Cultural Difference in Indigenous Copyright Cases

References

• Anker, Kirsten. 2014. Declarations of Interdependence: A Legal Pluralist Approach to Indigenous Rights. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Productivity Commission. 2022. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Visual Arts and Crafts. Study Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, Nicholas. 1999. “The Search for a Culturally Sensitive Approach to Legal Protection of Aboriginal Art.” Copyright Reporter 17 (2): 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Paul. 2011. Law’s Anthropology: From Ethnography to Expert Testimony in Native Title. Canberra: ANU University E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, Harry H. 1995. “Intellectual Property in the Global Village.” Government Information in Canada 1 (4): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, Colin. 1996. The Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime: Its History, Cosmogenesis, Cosmology and Ontology. Geelong, Victoria: Gamahucher Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, Peter. 2014. Intellectual Property, Indigenous People and Their Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, Louis. 1966. Homo hierarchicus: Essai sur le système des castes. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, Jeremy. 2010. “John Bulunbulun (dec)”. Maningrida Arts and Culture. https://maningrida.com/artist/john-bulunbulun-dec/.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstenblith, Patty. 1995. “Identity and Cultural Property. The Protection of Cultural Property in the United States.” Boston University Law Review 75: 559–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, Stephan. 2012. Negotiating Tradition: The Pragmatics of International Deliberations on Cultural Property. Göttingen: Göttingen University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.gup.608.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2023. Investigation Finds No ‘Improper Interference’ in Paintings Made by APY Art Centre Collective. Accessed September 4, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/02/investigation-finds-no-improper-interference-in-paintings-made-by-apy-art-centre-collective.
   Google Scholar
• Hardie, Martin. 2015. “What Wandjuk Wanted?” In Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, edited by Mathew Rimmer, 155–176. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955901.00015.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, Terri. 2003. Minding Culture: Case Studies on Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Vivien. 1996. Copyrites: Aboriginal Art in the Age of Reproductive Technologies. Sydney: National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association/Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, Ian. 1994. Knowledge and Secrecy in an Aboriginal Religion: Yolngu of North-East Arnhem Land. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, Ian. 1995. “Metaphor and the Metalanguage: “Groups” in Northeast Arnhem Land.” American Ethnologist 22 (3): 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.3.02a00030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, Ian. 2011. “The Language of Property: Analyses of Yolngu Relations to Country.” In Ethnography and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge: Essays in Honor of Nicolas Peterson, edited by Yasmine Musharbash and Marcus Barber, 101–119. Canberra: Australian National University E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, Ian. 2014. “The Language of ‘Rights’ in the Analysis of Aboriginal Property Relations.” Les Actes de Colloques du Musée du Quai Branly 4: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4000/actesbranly.547.
   Google Scholar
• Magowan, Fiona C. 2001. “Waves of Knowing: Polymorphism and Co-Substantive Essences in Yolngu Sea Cosmology.” The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 29 (1): 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Márquez Porras, Raúl, and Riccardo Mazzola. 2019. “Vindicatory Justice and the State. Accounts from Yolngu and Shuar Ethnographies.” Sociologia Del Diritto 3: 71–94. http://doi.org/10.3280/SD2019-003004.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola, Riccardo. 2018. Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Conceptual Analysis. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola, Riccardo. 2020. “‘I Make an Oath and say as Follows’: Yolngu Judicial Discourse on Sacred art and Copyright.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 10 (4): 876–902. https://doi.org/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1135.
   Google Scholar
• McCausland, Sally. 1999. “Protecting Communal Interests in Indigenous Artworks after the Bulun Bulun Case.” Indigenous Law Bullettin 22 (4): 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, Richard. 2002. “Shifting Ground: Context and Change in Two Australian Legal Systems.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 15 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015000128505.
   Google Scholar
• Morphy, Howard. 1983. “‘Now You Understand’: An Analysis of the Way Yolngu Have Used Sacred Knowledge to Retain Their Autonomy.” In Aborigines, Land and Land Rights, edited by Nicolas Peterson and Marcia Langton, 110–133. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Morphy, Howard. 1991. Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morphy, Howard. 2007. Becoming Art: Exploring Cross-Cultural Categories. Randwick: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morphy, Frances. 2007. “Performing Law: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay Meet the Native Title Process.” In The Social Effects of Native Title: Recognition, Translation, Coexistence, edited by Benjamin R. Smith and F. Morphy, 31–58. Canberra: Australian National University E Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/SENT.10.2007.02.
   Google Scholar
• Morphy, Frances. 2008. “Enacting Sovereignty in a Colonized Space: The Yolngu of Blue Mud Bay Meet the Native Title Process.” In The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: ‘Restoring What Was Ours’, edited by Derick Fay and Deborah James, 31–57. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morphy, Frances. 2021. “Australia’s Indigenous Protected Areas: Resistance, Articulation, and Entanglement in the Context of Natural Resource Management.” In Entangled Territorialities Negotiating Indigenous Lands in Australia and Canada, edited by Francoise Dussart and Sylvie Poirier, 70–90. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, Fred R. 2002. Painting Culture: The Making of an Aboriginal High Art. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oguamanan, Chidi. 2004. “Localizing Intellectual Property in the Globalization Epoch: The Integration of Indigenous Knowledge.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11 (2): 135–169. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2004.11.2.135.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, Mark, Kristin Dawkins, and Mark Vallianatos. 1996. “Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity: The Industrialization of Natural Resources and Traditional Knowledge.” Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development 11 (2): 431–453.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, James W. W. 2022. “Forensic and Expert Social Anthropology.” Open Anthropological Research 2 (1): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/opan-2022-0116.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2009. Sociología Jurídica Crítica. Para un Nuevo Sentido Común en el Derecho. Madrid: Trotta-ILSA.
   Google Scholar
• Schebeck, Bernard. 1968. Dialect and Social Groupings in North East Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, María Teresa. 2011. “Pluralismo Jurídico y Interlegalidad. Debates Antropológicos en Torno al Derecho Indígena y las Politicas del Reconocimiento.” In Justicia y Diversidad en América Latina. Pueblos Indígena Ante la Globalisación, edited by Victora Chenaut, Magdalena Gómez, Héctor Ortiz, and María Teresa Sierra, 385–406. Quito: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Yan. 2002. “La Valeur des Choses. Le Droit Romain Hors la Religion.” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 57 (6): 1431–1462. https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.2002.280119.
   Google Scholar
• Vaver, David. 1997. Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademarks. Toronto: Irwin Law.
   Google Scholar