Incrementalism Revisited – The Contrasting Approaches of Italy, England and Wales and Northern Ireland Towards Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage

References

• Aloni, E. (2010). Incrementalism, civil unions, and the possibility of predicting legal recognition of same-sex marriage. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 18(1), 105.
   Google Scholar
• Aloni, E. (2020a). First comes marriage, then comes baby, then comes what exactly? National Taiwan University Law Review, 15, 49. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloni, E. (2020b). Incremententalism in same-sex marriage legislation. In F. Hamilton & G. Noto La Diega (Eds.), Same-sex relationships, law and social change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Awondo, P., Geschiere, P., & Reid, G. (2012). Homophobic Africa? Toward a more nuanced view. African Studies Review, 55(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002020600007241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badgett, M. L. (2005). Predicting partnership rights: Applying the European experience in the United States’. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 17(1), 71.
   Google Scholar
• Bamforth, N. (2012). Sexuality and citizenship in contemporary constitutional argument. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(2), 477. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, N. (2011). Ambiguous symbolisms: Recognising customary marriage and same-sex marriage in South Africa. International Journal of Law in Context, 7(4), 447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552311000243
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2019). DUP urge Stormont recall to stop law change. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-50062998
   Google Scholar
• Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor Intervening) [2003] 2 AC 467 at 480 para 46.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D. (2003). Comparative law, family law and common law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.1.127
   Google Scholar
• Buffone, G., Gattuso, M., & Winkler, M. M. (2016). Unione civile e convivenza. Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Marriage Act 2005, ch 33 (Can).
   Google Scholar
• Close & Ors, Re Application for Judicial Review [2020] NICA 20.
   Google Scholar
• Defense of Marriage Act (‘DOMA’) 1996 (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Dennis v Dennis [1995] 2 All ER 51.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, (2022) No. 19-1392, 597 U.S Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project [2005] ZACC 19, 2006 (1) SA 524 (CC), 2006 (3) BCLR 355 (CC).
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: the sexual politics of neoliberalism. In D Nelson and R Castronovo (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W. (2000). Comparative law and the same-sex marriage debate: A step-by-step approach toward state recognition. McGeorge Law Review, 31(3), 641.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W. (2002). Equality practices, civil unions and the future of gay rights. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W. (2013a). Backlash politics: How constitutional litigation has advanced marriage equality in the United States. BUL Rev, 93, 275.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W. N., Jr. (2013b). Marriage equality: An idea whose time is coming. NYU Review of Law & Social Change, 37(1), 245.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W. (2015). Original meaning and marriage equality. Houston Law Review, 52, 1067.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W., and Spedale, D. (2006). Gay marriage: For better or for worse?
   Google Scholar
• Eurispes survey. (2020, July 17). https://eurispes.eu/news/eurispes-temi-etici-lopinione-degli-italiani/
   Google Scholar
• European Convention of Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Tonge, J. (2018). Partisan and religious drivers of moral conservatism: Same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland. Party Politics, 24(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816656665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falletti, E. (2016). Obbligo di fedeltà. Profili storici e di diritto comparato di un istituto non previsto nell’unione civile. GenIus, 2016, 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Fegan, E. V., & Rebouche, R. (2003). Northern Ireland’s abortion law: The morality of silence and the censure of agency. Feminist Legal Studies, 11(3), 221. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000004587.37503.5d
   Google Scholar
• Gattuso, M. (2017). La clausola generale di equivalenza, and Buffone, G. La clausola generale di equivalenza. In M. Gattuso & M. M. Winkler (Eds.), Unione civile e convivenza (pp. 287). Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, K. (2010). Gay marriage and gay union law in the Americas. Law and Business Review America, 16(2), 285.
   Google Scholar
• Goodridge v. Dep’t of Pub. Health, (2003) 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass.)
   Google Scholar
• Government Equalities Office. (2014). Consultation on the future of civil partnership in England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, F. (2016). Strategies to achieve same-sex marriage and the method of incrementalist change. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 25(1), 121.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, F. (2017). The symbolic status of same-sex marriage. Fam Law, 47, 851.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, F., & Noto La Diega, G. (Eds.). (2020). Same-sex relationships, law and social change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Law Review. (2004). Inching Down the Aisle: Differing Paths Toward the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States and Europe Developments in the Law: The Law of Marriage and Family, 116(7), 2009. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1342751
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. C., & Nagle, J. (2019). Ethnonationalism and attitudes towards same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland. Internaitonal Political Science Review, 40(4), 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, A. (2020). Relationships with status: Civil partnership in an era of same-sex marriage. 189 in Hamilton and Noto La Diega.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2020). Family law (9th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2012). Equal marriage: The government’s response. https:///wwwgov.uk/government/uploads/systm/uploads/attachment_data/fil3/133262/consultaiton-reponse_1_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ho, J. A. (2014). Weather permitting: Incrementalism, animus, and the art of forecasting marriage equality after U.S. V. windsor. Cleveland State Law Review, 62(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• H. v. Finland (Application No 37359/09).
   Google Scholar
• Hyde v Hyde (1866) LR 1 P&D 130 at 133.
   Google Scholar
• ILGA. (2022). Sexual Orientation Laws. https://ilga.org/maps-sexual-orientation-laws.
   Google Scholar
• IPSOS MORI. (2016). https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/attitudes-towards-same-sex-marriage-northern-ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, J. (2005). Citizenship, same-sex marriage and feminist critiques of marriage. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050206
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Lysaght, K. (2004). Sexual citizenship in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Gender, Place & Culture, 11(1), 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Klarman, M. J. (2005). Brown and Lawrence (and Goodridge). Michigan Law Review, 104(3), 431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarman, M. J. (2014). Windsor and brown: Marriage equality and racial equality. Harvard Law Review, 16(1), 127.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, A. (2021). Queer(y)ing consummation: An empirical reflection on the marriage (same sex couples) act 2013 and the role of consummation. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 33(2), 143.
   Google Scholar
• Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. L. (2010). Strategic pragmatism or radical idealism? The same-sex marriage and civil rights movements juxtaposed. William and Mary Policy Review, 2(1), 194.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, C., & Stewart, T. (2020). The legalisation of same-sex marriage. The Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 71(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v71i4.536
   Google Scholar
• Merin, Y. (2002). Equality for same-sex couples. The legal recognition of gay partnerships in Europe and the United States. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• M v H [1999] 2 SCR 3.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (2005). Tradition and the law: A response to wax. San Diego Law Review, 42(3), 1111.
   Google Scholar
• Obergefell v Hodges 576 US, 135 S Ct 2584. (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Obligaciones Estatales en Relacion Con El Cambio De Nombre, La Identidad de enero, Y Los Derochos Derivados De Un Vinculo Entre Parjas Del Mismo Sexo, Judgemnt of the Inter-American Court, 9 January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Marriages in England and wales in 2018. Marriages in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Oliari v Italy ECtHR Application Nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11
   Google Scholar
• Palazzo, N. (2022). Marriage apostates: Why heterosexuals seek same-sex registered partnerships. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 42(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjgl.v42i1.8713
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Resolution 2239 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 10 October 2018
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, J. T., Starks, T. J., Gamarel, K. E., & Grov, C. (2018). Non-monogamy and sexual relationship quality among same-sex male couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(5), 669. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029561
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. (2019). A global snapshot of same-sex marriage. https:///www/pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/17/global-snapshot-sex-marriage/
   Google Scholar
• Re X [2017] NI Fam 12 (17 Aug 2017) para 18.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. A. J. (2004). Book Review, reviewing Stychin, C. F., (2003). Governing sexuality: The changing politics of citizenship and law reform. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(4), 727. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.4.727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 U.S. 113.
   Google Scholar
• Romboli, R. La legittimità costituzionale del divorzi imposto: quando la Corte dialoga con il legislatore, ma dimentica il giudice. Consulta Online. https://www.giurcost.org/studi/romboli3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32.
   Google Scholar
• Saez, M. (2001). General report ‘same-sex marriage, same-sex cohabitation, and same-sex families around the world; Why ‘same’ is so different. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 19(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.54648/ERPL2011046
   Google Scholar
• Schalk and Kopf v Austria, ECtHR Application No. 30141/04.
   Google Scholar
• Schillaci, A. (Ed.). (2014). Omosessualità, eguaglianza, diritti. Carocci editore.
   Google Scholar
• Shieh, W.-Y. (2015). Why same-sex couples break up: A follow-up study in Taiwan. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 12(3), 257. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2015.1057887
   Google Scholar
• Side, K. (2006). Contract, charity, and honourable entitlement: Social citizenship and the 1967 abortion act in Northern Ireland after the Good Friday agreement. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 13(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxj004
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, L. (2006). The cultural politics of sexuality and reproduction in Northern Ireland. Sociology, 40(4), 663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506065153
   Google Scholar
• Sperti, A. (2013). Omosessualità e diritti (Pisa University Press) and constitutional courts, gay rights and sexual orientation equality. Hart. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sperti, A., (2020) The role of constitutional courts in promoting marriage equality and their relationship with movements and legislators in Hamilton and Noto La Diega. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. (2016). Abortion and same-sex marriage: How are non-sectarian controversial issues discussed in Northern Irish politics? Irish Political Studies, 31(4), 483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2015.1103226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribe, L. (2012). The constitutional inevitability’ of same-sex marriage. Maryland Law Review, 71(2), 471. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol71/iss2/5
   Google Scholar
• Triger, Z. H. (2012). Fear of the wandering gay: Some reflections on citizenship, nationalism and recognition in same-sex relationships. International Journal of Law in Context, 8(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552312000080
   Google Scholar
• UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Vallianatos and Others v. Greece ECtHR Application no. 3719/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Verchick, R. M. (2005). Same-sex and the city. Urban Law, 37(1), 191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waaldijk, K. (2000). Civil developments: Patterns of reform in the legal position of same-sex partners in Europe. Canadian Journal Family Law, 17(1), 62.
   Google Scholar
• Waaldijk, K. (2001). Small change: How the road to same-sex marriage got paved in the Netherlands. In R. Wintemute & M. Andenaes (Eds.), Legal recognition of same-sex partnerships (pp. 437). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wen-Yi, S., Wen-Long, C., & Hsiu-Yun, T. (2017). A study of the positive strategies used in long-term same-sex couple relationships in Taiwan, 23 Taiwan Sing Syueh Syueh Kan. Formosan Journal of Sexology, 23(1), 53.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam).
   Google Scholar
• Wintemute, R. (2004). Sexual orientation and the charter: The achievement of formal legal equality (1985–2005) and its limits. McGill Law Journal, 49(4), 1143.
   Google Scholar
• X (In the Matter of a Petition by) (Rev 1) [2020] NICA.
   Google Scholar
• Zanetti, G. (2015). L’orientamento sessuale. Cinque domande tra diritto e filosofia. Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Zylan, Y. (2011). States of passion: Law, identity and social construction of desire. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar