Overlap Analysis: A Case Study

References

• Banks, R. A. (2006). Decision-making factors related to bibliographic database cancellation. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 25(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1300/J103v25n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Belvadi, M. (2016). Do‐it‐yourself title overlap comparisons: Where do we go from here? [Paper presentation]. Charleston Conference Proceedings 2015. Charleston, SC, US. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316261
   Google Scholar
• Blecic, D. D., Wiberley, S. E., Fiscella, J. B., Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, S., & Lowery, R. (2013). Deal or no deal? Evaluating big deals and their journals. College & Research Libraries, 74(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeding, M. (2016). Simon Fraser University ends development of CUFTS. Smart Libraries Newsletter, 36(11), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, E. (n.d.). Overlap Analysis. SPARC. Retrieved December 12, 2021, from https://sparcopen.org/our-work/negotiation-resources/data-analysis/overlap-analysis/.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2006). Overlap between traditional periodical indexes and newer mega indexes. Serials Review, 32(4), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2006.10765072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. (2008). Electronic resource management systems (ERMS) review. Serials Review, 34(4), 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2008.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Cowhitt, T., & Cutts, A. (2020). Using network analysis to compare bibliographic database journal coverage. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 32(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2020.1790952
   Google Scholar
• Duong, K., Perruso, C., & Ramachandran, H. (2013). Content overlap and replacement cost analyses: Tools to evaluate abstracting/indexing (A&I) and full-text databases in science and engineering. Science & Technology Libraries, 32(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2012.758461
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons, M. (2010). JISC Academic Database Assessment Tool (ADAT). http://www.jisc-adat.com. Public Services Quarterly, 6(1), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228950903517423
   Google Scholar
• Garg, K. C., Kumar, S., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Bibliometric study of the coverage and overlap of journals indexed by four abstracting and indexing services in library and information science. The Serials Librarian, 79(1–2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1704341
   Google Scholar
• Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluck, M. (1990). A review of journal coverage overlap with an extension to the definition of overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199001)41:1≤ 43::AID-ASI4 ≥3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, M. (2015). Student workers as library programmers: A case study in automated overlap analysis [Paper presentation]. Charleston Library Conference 2014. Charleston, SC, US. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Tech/7 https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315640
   Google Scholar
• Harker, K. R., & Kizhakkethil, P. (2015). The quick and the dirty: The good, the bad, and the ugly of database overlap at the journal title level. The Serials Librarian, 68(1–4), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1016858
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, R. (2016). Journal overlap analysis of the GeoRef and Web of Science databases. Science & Technology Libraries, 35(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1128374
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, R. (2020). Journal overlap of the GEOBASE database with the GeoRef and Web of Science databases. The Serials Librarian, 79(1–2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2020.1778601
   Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M., Killian, D., Bezanson, D., & Kinder, R. (2016). A tale of two serials cancellations [Paper presentation]. Charleston Library Conference 2016. Charleston, SC, US. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2016/cdaassess/16 https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316441
   Google Scholar
• Reed, K. (2022). Library guides @ VIU: Assessment @ VIU Library: Overlap analysis. Retrieved October 17, 2022, from https://library.viu.ca/c.php?g=188991&p=1247830.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeh, T., & Ellingsen, M. (2005). Electronic resource management systems: The need and the realization. New Library World, 106(5/6), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800510595823
   Google Scholar
• Sasyk, Z. M., & Lewis, A. K. (2019). Overlap analysis, usage statistics, and the evaluation of aggregator databases. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 31(2), 120–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2019.1597459
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. (2008). An overlap analysis of occupational therapy electronic journals available in full-text databases and subscription services. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 5(4), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424060802453720
   Google Scholar
• Serials Solutions Adds Overlap Analysis. (2004). Library journal. Retrieved October 18, 2022, from https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/Archive/serials-solutions-adds-overlap-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. (2012). Database cancellation: The “hows” and “whys.” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 24(2), 154–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2012.684564
   Google Scholar
• Stockton, M., & Machovec, G. (2001). Gold rush. Technical Services Quarterly, 19(3), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v19n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. (2013). A model for electronic resources value assessment. The Serials Librarian, 64(1–4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.760417
   Google Scholar
• Trail, M. A., Chang-FitzGibbon, K., & Wishnetsky, S. (2012). Using assessment to make difficult choices in cutting periodicals. The Serials Librarian, 62(1–4), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2012.652931
   Google Scholar