The development of Landscape Archaeology in Britain, present conflicts and possible new directions

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Anschuetz, K. F., Wilshusen, R. H., & Scheick, C. L., 2001. ‘An archaeology of landscapes: perspectives and directions’, J Archaeol Res, 9 (2), pp. 157–211. doi: 10.1023/A:1016621326415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston, M., 1985. Interpreting the Landscape (London).
   Google Scholar
• Aston, M., & Rowley, T., 1974. Landscape Archaeology: an introduction to fieldwork techniques on post-Roman landscapes (Newton Abbot).
   Google Scholar
• Barret, J., Bradley, R., Bowden, M., & Mead, B., 1983. ‘South Lodge after Pitt Rivers’, Antiq, 57 (221), pp. 193–204. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00055617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barret, J. C., & Ko, I., 2009. ‘A phenomenology of landscape: a crisis in British landscape archaeology?’, J Soc Archaeol, 9 (3), pp. 275–94. doi: 10.1177/1469605309338422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, B., Tilley, C., & Hamilton, S., 2006. Stone Worlds: narrative and reflexivity in archaeology (London).
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, J., 1957. Ancient Landscapes: studies in field archaeology (London).
   Google Scholar
• Brück, J., 1998. ‘In the footsteps of the ancestors: a review of Christopher Tilley’s phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments’, Archaeol Rev from Cambridge, 15 (1), pp. 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Brück, J., 2005. ‘Experience the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory’, Archaeol Dialogues, 12 (1), pp. 45–72. doi: 10.1017/S1380203805001583
   Google Scholar
• Childe, G., 1950. ‘The urban revolution’, Town Plann Rev, 21 (1), pp. 3–17. doi: 10.3828/tpr.21.1.k853061t614q42qh
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. M., 1998. ‘The qualitative-quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation’, J Advanced Nursing, 27 (6), pp. 1242–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00651.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G., 1945. ‘Farmers and forests in Neolithic Europe’, Antiq, 19 (74), pp. 57–71. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00018937
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., 1975. The Earlier Stone Age Settlement of Scandinavia (London).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. L., 1968. Analytical Archaeology (London).
   Google Scholar
• Conneller, C., 2000. ‘Fragmented spaces? Hunter-gatherer landscapes in the Vale of Pickering’, Archaeol Rev from Cambridge, 17 (1), pp. 139–50.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, O. G. S., 1912. ‘The distribution of Early Bronze Age settlements in Britain’, Geogr J, 40 (2), pp. 184–97. doi: 10.2307/1778466
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, O. G. S., 1929. Air-photography for Archaeologists (London).
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, O. G. S., 1953. Archaeology in the Field (London).
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Clark, V., 2011. ‘The nature of Mixed Methods research’, in Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, ed. J. Creswell & V. Clark (London), pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Curwen, H., 1928. ‘Ancient cultivations at Grassington, Yorkshire’, Antiq, 2 (6), pp. 168–72. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00001721
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J., 2008. ‘Three Men in a Boat: biographies and narrative in the historic landscape’, Landscape Res, 33 (5), pp. 511–30. doi: 10.1080/01426390802323732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, A. 2006. ‘Post-processual Landscape Archaeology: a critique’, Cambridge Archaeol J, 16 (3), pp. 267–80. doi: 10.1017/S0959774306000163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, P., 2001. ‘Reading the land’, Br Archaeol, 62, pp. 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, P., & Blackwell, I., 2009. An English Countryside Explored: the land of Lettice Sweetapple (1st edn 1998) (Stroud)
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, M. J. F., & Fowler, Y. M., 2005. ‘Detection of archaeological crop marks on declassified CORO NAKH-4B Intelligence Satellite Photography of Southern England’, Archaeol Prospection, 12 (4), pp. 257–64. doi: 10.1002/arp.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C., 1932. The Personality of Britain (Cardiff).
   Google Scholar
• Frede, D., 1993. ‘The question of being: Heidegger’s project’, in The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, ed. C. Guignon (Cambridge), pp. 42–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, R. M., Bruck, J., Johnston, R., et al., 2008. ‘Historical context and chronology of Bronze Age land enclosure on Dartmoor, UK’, J Archaeol Sci, 35, pp. 2250–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, H., 1940. ‘Studies of the post-glacial history of British vegetation – III. Fenland polen diagrams – IV. Post-glacial changes of relative land and sea-level in the English Fenland’, Philos Trans R Soc London, 230 (570), pp. 239–303.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K., 2002. Archaeology: an introduction (London).
   Google Scholar
• Gruppuso, P., & Ehitehouse, A., 2020. ‘Exploring taskscapes: an introduction’, Soc Anthropol, 28 (3), pp. 588–97. doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., Brown, K., et al., 2006. ‘Phenomenology in practice: towards a methodology for a “subjective” approach’, European J Archaeol, 9, pp. 31–71. doi: 10.1177/1461957107077704
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R., & Ellis-Schön, J., 2017. ‘The Finding Pitt-Rivers project: a reassessment of the numismatic assemblage from Woodcutts in context’, Wiltshire Archaeol & Nat Hist Mag, 110, pp. 179–190.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., 2016. ‘The temporality of the landscape revisited’, Norwegian Archaeol Rev, 49 (1), pp. 5–22. doi: 10.1080/00293652.2016.1151458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J., 1995. ‘The phenomenological dimension’, in The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, ed. B. Smith & D. W. Smith (Cambridge), pp. 78–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, B., & Berry, B., 2011. ‘Racial and ethnic biases in rental housing: an audit study of online apartment listings’, City & Community, 10 (4), pp. 351–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, W. G., 1955. The Making of the English Landscape (London).
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., 1993. ‘The temporality of the landscape’, World Archaeol, 25 (2), pp. 152–74. doi: 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., & Olsen, B., 1992. ‘Hermeneutics and archaeology: on the philosophy of contextual archaeology’, American Antiq, 57, pp. 419–36. doi: 10.2307/280931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., 2007. Ideas of Landscape (Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. H., 2012. ‘Phenomenological approaches in landscape archaeology’, Annual Rev Anthropol, 41, pp. 269–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J., 2004. ‘Mixed Methods Research: a research paradigm whose time has come’, Educ Res, 33 (7), pp. 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Le Pard, G., 1994. ‘The trustworthy mole: Heywood Summer, archaeologist and author’, Proc Hampshire Field Club & Archaeol Soc, 50, pp. 209–35.
   Google Scholar
• Llobera, M. 2007. ‘Reconstructing visual landscapes’, World Archaeol, 39 (1), pp. 51–69. doi: 10.1080/00438240601136496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, G., 2003. Using Computers in Archaeology: towards virtual pasts (London).
   Google Scholar
• Matheny, K. B., 1996. ‘Landscape Archaeology’, in The Oxford Companion to Archaeology, ed. B. M. Fagan (Oxford), pp. 384–5.
   Google Scholar
• McFadyen, L., 2007. ‘Mobile spaces of Mesolithic Britain’, Home Cult, 4 (2), pp. 117–28. doi: 10.2752/174063107X208984
   Google Scholar
• Mills, P., & Rajala, U., 2011. ‘Interpreting a ceramiscene landscape – the Roman pottery from the Nepi Survey Project’, in Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, TRAC 2010, ed. D. Mladenović & B. Russell (Oxford), pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, C., 2014. ‘The place of photographs in the collections, displays, and other work of general Pitt- Rivers’, Mus Hist J, 7 (2), pp. 168–87. doi: 10.1179/1936981614Z.00000000030
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R., 2003. ‘William Stukeley: an eighteenth- century phenomenologist?’ Antiq, 77 (3), pp. 394–400. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00092371
   Google Scholar
• Powlesland, D., 2009. ‘Why bother? Large scale geomagnetic sur vey and the quest for “Real Archaeology” ’, in Seeing the Unseen, ed. S. R. L. Campana & S. Piro (London), pp. 167–82.
   Google Scholar
• Price, T. D., & Knudson, K. J., 2018. Principles of Archaeology (London).
   Google Scholar
• Qutoshi, S. B., 2018. ‘Phenomenology: a philosophy and method of inquiry’, J Educ & Educational Dev, 5 (1), pp. 215–22. doi: 10.22555/joeed.v5i1.2154
   Google Scholar
• Rahtz, P., 2001. Living Archaeology (Stroud).
   Google Scholar
• Rajalla, U., & Mills, P., 2017. ‘Interpreting a ceramiscene: characterising Late Republican and Imperial landscapes’, in Forms of Dwelling: 20 Years of taskscapes in archaeology, ed. L. Raljala & P. Mills (Oxford), pp. 62–84.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C., 1969. ‘Trade and culture process in European Prehistory’, Current Anthropol, 10 (2/3), pp. 151–69. doi: 10.1086/201066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C., & Bahn, P., 2000. Archaeology: theories methods and practice (London).
   Google Scholar
• Richards-Rissetto, H., 2017. ‘What can GIS + 3D mean for landscape archaeology?’, J Archaeol Sci, 84, pp. 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippon, S., 2009. ‘Understanding the medieval landscape’, in Fifty Years of Medieval Archaeology, ed. R. Gilchrist & A. Reynolds (Society for Medieval Archaeology, Leeds), pp. 227–255.
   Google Scholar
• Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K., 2002. ‘Revisiting the Quantitative–Qualitative Debate: implications for Mixed-Methods Research’, Quality & Quantity, 36, pp. 43–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1014301607592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, M., & Witmore, C., 2010. ‘Echoes across the past: chorography and topography in antiquarian engagements with place’, Performance Res, 15 (4), pp. 97–106. doi: 10.1080/13528165.2010.539888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, V. G., 1971. ‘The structure of Romano-British New Forest pottery kilns’, Antiq, 45 (177), pp. 45–8. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00104417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds, J. E., & Gorard, S., 2010. 'Dearh of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft', Education & Research in Education, 23 (2), pp. 121-36.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., 2006. 'Phenomenology and material culture', in Handbook of Material Culture, ed. C. Tilley, W Keane, S. Küchler, et al. (London), pp. 43-59.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, C., 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape (Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, C., 2010. Interpreting Landscapes: geologies, topographies, identities: explorations in landscape phenomenology, 3 (Walnut Creek, CA, US).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., 2001. 'Composing Avebury', World Archaeol, 33 (2), pp. 296-314. doi: 10.1080/00438240120079307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar