Monolingual cringe and ideologies of English: Anglophone migrants to Luxembourg draw their experiences in a multilingual society

References

• Barakos, Elisabeth. 2019. “Multilingual Language Trainers as Language Workers: a Discourse-Ethnographic Investigation.” Language and Intercultural Communication 19: 184–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, Jan. 1999. “The Debate is Open.” In Language Ideological Debates, edited by Jan Blommaert, 1–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Le langage et le pouvoir symbolique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, Brigitte. 2012. “The Linguistic Repertoire Revisited.” Applied Linguistics 33: 503–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellotti, Véronique, and Danièle Moore. 2011. “« Dessins d’enfants, recherche qualitative, interprétation. Des poly-textes pour l’étude des imaginaires du plurilinguisme ».” In Guide pour la recherche en didactique des langues et des cultures. Approches contextualisées, edited by P. Blanchet, and P. Chardenet, 118–132. Paris: AUF/EAC.
   Google Scholar
• Castellottti, Véronique, and Danièle Moore. 2009. “Dessins d’enfants et constructions plurilingues. Territoires imagés et parcours imaginés.” In Le dessin réflexif: Element pour une herméneutique du sujet plurilingue, edited by Muriel Moliné, 45–85. Cergy: Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, Justine, Janet Holmes, and Nikolas Coupland. 1998. “Negotiating sun use: Constructing Consistency and Managing Inconsistency.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 699–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, David. 2003. English as a Global Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Alan. 2006. “The Native Speaker in Applied Linguistics.” In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, edited by Alan Davies and Catherine Elder, 431–450. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• de Bres, Julia. 2013. “Language Ideologies for Constructing Inclusion and Exclusion: Identity and Interest in the Metalinguistic Discourse of Cross-Border Workers in Luxembourg.” In Ideological Conceptualisations of Language: Discourses of Linguistic Diversity, , edited by Erzebet Barat, Patrick Studer, and Jiri Nekvapil, 57–83. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• de Bres, Julia. 2014. “Competing Language Ideologies About Societal Multilingualism among Cross-Border Workers in Luxembourg.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 227: 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• de Bres, Julia. 2017a. “Friend or foe? The Discourse of the Rise of English in Luxembourg. Forum.” December 2017: 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• de Bres, Julia. 2017b. “Singing is the First Thing That Came Into my Head: Emotions and Language Maintenance among Filipino Migrants in New Zealand.” In Linguist at Work. Festschrift for Janet Holmes, edited by Meredith Marra, and Paul Warren, 137–158. Wellington: VUW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, Neriko Musha, ed. 2009. The Native Speaker Concept: Ethnographic Investigations of Native Speaker Effects. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Franziskus, Anne. 2013. Getting by in a multilingual workplace: Language practices, norms and ideologies of cross-border workers in Luxembourg. PhD thesis. Luxembourg: University of Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland, and Angie Williams. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Llandybie: Dinefwr Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gearing, Nigel, and Peter Roger. 2018. “‘I’m Never Going to be Part of it’: Identity, Investment and Learning Korean.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39: 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, Howard, and Phillip Smith. 1979. “Accommodation Theory: Optimal Levels of Convergence.” In Language and Social Psychology, edited by Howard Giles and Robert N. St. Clair, 45–65. Baltimore: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, Kristine, and Jean-Jacques Weber. 2011. “Not Playing the Game: Shifting Patterns in the Discourse of Integration.” Journal of Language and Politics 10 (2): 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroskrity, Paul V. 2004. “Language Ideologies.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 496–517. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lovrits, Veronika, and Julia de Bres. 2020. “Prestigious Language, Pigeonholed Speakers: Stances Towards the ‘Native English Speaker’ in a Multilingual European Institution.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 1–20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/josl.12431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milroy, Lesley. 1999. “Standard English and Language Ideology in Britain and the United States.” In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by A. R. Bex, and R. Watts, 173–206. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molinié, Muriel, ed. 2009. Le dessin réflexif: Element pour une herméneutique du sujet plurilingue. Cergy: Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Joseph Sung-Yul. 2011. “Framing, Stance, and Affect in Korean Metalinguistic Discourse.” Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 21 (2): 265–282.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, Robert. 1993. Linguistic Imperialism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2016. Visual Methodologies: an Introduction to Interpretation of Visual Materials. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seargeant, Philip. 2009. The Idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the Evolution of a Global Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• STATEC. 2018. Luxembourg in Figures 2018. Luxembourg: STATEC.
   Google Scholar
• Torsh, Hanna. 2015. The language cringe of the native speaker. Blog post, June 10 2015. Language on the Move. https://www.languageonthemove.com/the-language-cringe-of-the-the-native-speaker/.
   Google Scholar
• Torsh, Hanna Irving. 2020. Linguistic Intermarriage in Australia: Between Pride and Shame. Sydney: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth. 2013. “Multilingualism in EU Institutions. Between Policymaking and Implementation.” In Multilingualism and Multimodality: Current Challenges for Educational Studies, edited by Ingrid de Saint-Georges, and Jean-Jacques Weber, 81–99. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Woolard, Kathryn A. 1998. “Language Ideology as a Field of Inquiry.” In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, edited by Barbara Schieffelin, Kathryn Woolard, and Paul Kroskrity, 3–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar