Willingness to communicate in a multilingual context: part one, a time-serial study of developmental dynamics

References

• Baker, S., and P. D. MacIntyre. 2000. “The Role of Gender and Immersion in Communication and Second Language Orientations.” Language Learning 50: 311–341. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., and C. Perchec. 2015. “New Directions for the Study of Within-Individual Variability in Development: The Power of “N=1.” In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), The Global Context for New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 147: 57–67. doi:10.1002/cad.20085.
   Google Scholar
• Bernales, C. 2016. “Towards a Comprehensive Concept of Willingness to Communicate: Learners’ Predicted and Self-reported Participation in the Foreign Language Classroom.” System 56: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, A. S. 2007. “Lingua Franca English, Multilingual Communities, and Language Acquisition.” The Modern Language Journal 91: 923–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément, R., S. C. Baker, and P. D. MacIntyre. 2003. “Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language: The Effects of Context, Norms, and Vitality.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22: 190–209. doi:10.1177/0261927X03022002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bot, K., and C. Jaensch. 2015. “What Is Special About L3 Processing?.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18 (2): 130–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denies, K., T. Yashima, and R. Janssen. 2015. “Classroom Versus Societal Willingness to Communicate: Investigating French as a Second Language in Flanders.” The Modern Language Journal 99: 718–739. doi:10.1111/modl.12276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. M., and M. J. Munro. 2013. “The Development of L2 Oral Language Skills in Two L1 Groups: A 7-Year Study.” Language Learning 63 (2): 163–185. doi:10.1111/lang.12000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. M., M. J. Munro, J. A. Foote, E. Waugh, and J. Fleming. 2014. “Opening the Window on Comprehensible Pronunciation After 19 Years: A Workplace Training Study.” Language Learning 64 (3): 526–548. doi:10.1111/lang.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2001. “Activation or Inhibition? The Interaction of L1, L2 and L3 on the Language Mode Continuum.” In Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, edited by J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, and U. Jessner, 69–89. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Elahi Shirvan, M., G. H. Khajavy, P. D. MacIntyre, and T. Taherian. 2019. “A Meta-analysis of L2 Willingness to Communicate and its Three High-evidence Correlates.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48: 1241–1267. doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09656-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 2001. “The Bilingual’s Language Modes.” In One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing, edited by J. Nicol, 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 2008. Studying Bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 2010. Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge: Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 2015. “Bicultural Bilinguals.” International Journal of Bilingualism 19 (5): 572–586. doi:10.1177/1367006914526297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., and P. Hiver. 2018. “Genre-based L2 Writing Instruction and Writing-specific Psychological Factors: The Dynamics of Change.” Journal of Second Language Writing 40: 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A. 2016. “Swedish or English? Migrants' Experiences of the Exchangeability of Language Resources.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19 (4): 442–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A., C. Thorsen, and P. D. MacIntyre. in press. Willingness to Communicate in a Multilingual Context: Part Two, Person-context Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Hiver, P. 2016. “The Triumph Over Experience: Hope and Hardiness in Novice L2 Teachers.” In Positive Psychology in SLA, edited by P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, and S. Mercer, 168–192. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hodis, G. M., and F. A. Hodis. 2013. “Static and Dynamic Interplay among Communication Apprehension, Communicative Self-efficacy, and Willingness to Communicate in the Communication Course.” Basic Communication Course Annual 25: 70–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kanno, Y. 2017. Longitudinal Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Portland, OR: Colloquium at American Association for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., and L. Cameron. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowie, W. 2017. “Lost in State Space? – Methodological Considerations in Complex Dynamic Theory Approaches to SLD Research.” In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, edited by L. Ortega and Z. Han, 123–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lowie, W. M., and M. H. Verspoor. 2019. “Individual Differences and the Ergodicity Problem.” Language Learning 69 (1): 184–206. doi:10.1111/lang.12324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D. 2007. “Willingness to Communicate in the Second Language: Understanding the Decision to Speak as a Volitional Process.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (4): 564–576. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D. 2020. “Expanding the Theoretical Base for the Dynamics of Willingness to Communicate.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 10 (1): 111–131. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., and S. Ayres-Glassey. 2020. “Competence Appraisals: Dynamic Judgements of Communicative Competence in Real Time.” In Usage-Based Dynamics in Second Language Development, edited by W. Lowie, M. Michel, A. Rousse-Malpat, M. Keizer, and R. Steinkrauss, 155–175. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., C. Burns, and A. Jessome. 2011. “Ambivalence About Communicating in a Second Language: A Qualitative Study of French Immersion Students’ Willingness to Communicate.” The Modern Language Journal 95 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01141.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., and C. Charos. 1996. “Personality, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of Second Language Communication.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15: 3–26. doi:10.1177/0261927X960151001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei, and K. A. Noels. 1998. “Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation.” The Modern Language Journal 82 (4): 545–562. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., and T. Gregersen. 2021. “The Idiodynamic Method: Willingness to Communicate and Anxiety Processes Interacting in Real Time.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. doi:10.1515/iral-2021-0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., and J. J. Legatto. 2011. “A Dynamic System Approach to Willingness to Communicate: Developing an Idiodynamic Method to Capture Rapidly Changing Affect.” Applied Linguistics 32 (2): 149–171. doi:10.1093/applin/amq037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., E. Mackay, J. Ross, and E. Abel. 2017. “The Emerging Need for Methods Appropriate to Study Dynamic Systems.” In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, edited by L. Ortega and Z. Han, 97–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., J. Ross, and H. Sparling. 2019. “Flow Experiences and Willingness to Communicate: Connecting Scottish Gaelic Language and Traditional Music.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38: 536–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., L. Wang, and G. H. Khajavy. 2020. “Thinking Fast and Slow About Willingness to Communicate: A Two-systems View.” Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (3): 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, E., and P. D. MacIntyre. 2020. “Feedback from L1 Users – A Potential Facilitator of L2 Use.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 41 (5): 457–470. doi:10.1080/01434632.2019.1634721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. 1992. “Reliability and Validity of the Willingness to Communicate Scale.” Communication Quarterly 40 (1): 16–25. doi:10.1080/01463379209369817.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. 1997. “Willingness to Communicate, Communication Apprehension, and Self-perceived Communication Competence.” In Avoiding Communication: Shyness, Reticence, and Communication Apprehension, edited by J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, and D. M. Ayres, 2nd ed., 75–108. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., and V. P. Richmond. 1991. “Willingness to Communicate: A Cognitive View.” In Communication, Cognition, and Anxiety, edited by M. Booth-Butterfield, 19–37. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C., and C. G. Campbell. 2009. “The New Person-specific Paradigm in Psychology.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (2): 112–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitta, R., and K. Baba. 2015. “Self-regulation in the Evolution of the Ideal l2 Self: A Complex Dynamic Systems Approach to the L2 Motivational Self System.” In Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, edited by Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, and A. Henry, 367–396. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L., and Z. Han. 2017. Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, M., and A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak. 2015. “Investigating the Dynamic Nature of L2 Willingness to Communicate.” System 50: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, M., A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak, and J. Bielak. 2016. “Investigating the Nature of Classroom Willingness to Communicate (WTC): A Micro-perspective.” Language Teaching Research 20 (5): 654–671. doi:10.1177/1362168815609615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. E., and L. Woodrow. 2010. “Willingness to Communicate in English: A Model in the Chinese EFL Classroom Context.” Language Learning 60 (4): 834–876. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., and K. D. Roach. 1992. “Willingness to Communicate and Employee Success in U.S. Organizations.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 20: 95–115. doi:10.1080/00909889209365321.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B. 1990. “Communication Competence.” In Speech Communication: Essays to Commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the Speech Communication Association, edited by G. M. Phillips and J. T. Wood, 94–129. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidlhofer, B. 2005. “English as a Lingua Franca.” ELT Journal 59 (4): 339–341.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, E. J. 2017. “Exploring the Dynamic Long-term Interaction Between Cognitive and Psychosocial Resources in Adult Second Language Development at Varying Proficiency.” The Modern Language Journal 101: 369–390. doi:10.1111/modl.12400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, E. J. 2020. “The Impact of Learner Perceptions of Interlocutor IDs on Learner Possible Selves During a Short-term Experience Abroad.” In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and Their Individual Differences, edited by L. Gurzynski-Weiss, 210–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbeek, H., L. Jansen, and P. van Geert. 2012. “Scaffolding Dynamics and the Emergence of Problematic Learning Trajectories.” Learning and Individual Differences 22 (1): 64–75. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. 2000. A Pattern Test for Distinguishing Between Autoregressive and Mean-shift Data. Libertyville, IL: Taylor Enterprises. http://www.variation.com/cpa/tech/changepoint.html.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, M., M. Verspoor, and W. Lowie. 2011. “Variability and DST.” In A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development, edited by M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, and W. Lowie, 55–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• van Geert, P. L. C. 2011. “The Contribution of Complex Dynamic Systems to Development.” Child Development Perspectives 5: 273–278. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00197.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geert, P. L. C. 2020. “Dynamic Systems, Process and Development.” Human Development 63 (3-4): 153–179. doi:10.1159/000503825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., K. De Bot, and W. Lowie, eds. 2011. A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques. Vol. 29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. 2002. “Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language: The Japanese EFL Context.” The Modern Language Journal 86: 54–66. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. 2019. “L2 Motivation and Willingness to Communicate.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning, edited by M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, and S. Ryan, 203–223. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yashima, T., P. D. MacIntyre, and M. Ikeda. 2018. “Situated Willingness to Communicate in an L2: Interplay of Individual Characteristics and Context.” Language Teaching Research 22 (1): 115–137. doi:10.1177/1362168816657851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T., L. Zenuk-Nishide, and K. Shimizu. 2004. “The Influence of Attitudes and Affect on Willingness to Communicate and Second Language Communication.” Language Learning 54 (1): 119–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., N. Beckmann, and J. Beckmann. 2018. “To Talk or not to Talk: A Review of Situational Antecedents of Willingness to Communicate in the Second Language Classroom.” System 72 (2): 226–239. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar