377
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teachers’ views on their methodology and their profiles: in search of the possible reasons for the levelling effect of CLIL

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1112-1126 | Received 29 Mar 2021, Accepted 14 Jun 2021, Published online: 30 Jun 2021

References

  • Alejo, R., and A. Piquer-Píriz. 2016. “Urban vs. Rural CLIL: An Analysis of Input-Reated Variables, Motivation and Language Attainment.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 29 (3): 245–262.
  • Anghel, B., A. Cabrales, and J. M. Carro. 2016. “Evaluating a Bilingual Program in Spain: The Impact Beyond Foreign Language Learning.” Economic Inquiry 54 (2): 1202–1223.
  • Bonnet, A., and S. Breidbach. 2017. “CLIL Teachers’ Professionalization. Between Explicit Knowledge and Professional Identity.” In Applied Linguistic Perspectives on CLIL, edited by A. Llinares, and T. Morton, 270–285. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Cammarata, L. 2009. “Negotiating Curricular Transitions: Foreign Language Teachers’ Learning Experience with Content-Based Instruction.” The Canadian Modern Language Review 65 (4): 559–585.
  • Cammarata, L. 2010. “Foreign Language Teachers’ Struggle to Learn Content-Based Instruction.” L2 Journal 2 (1): 89–118.
  • Coyle, D. 2011. “Post-method Pedagogies: Using a Second or Other Language as a Learning Tool in CLIL Settings.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Zarobe, J. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 49–73. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Coyle, D. 2015. “Strengthening Integrated Learning: Towards a New Era for Pluriliteracies and Intercultural Learning.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 8 (2): 84–103.
  • Coyle, D., D. Marsh, and P. Hood. 2010. CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Czura, A., K. Papaja, and M. Urbaniak. 2009. “Bilingual Education and the Emergence of CLIL in Poland.” In CLIL in Practice. Perspectives from the Field, edited by D. Marsh, P. Mehisto, D. Wollff, R. Aliaga, T. Asikainen, M. Friols, and G. Langé, 172–178. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
  • Danielewicz, J. 2001. Teaching Selves. Identity, Pedagogy, and Teacher Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • De Mesmaeker, E., and K. Lochtman. 2014. “Belgian CLIL Teachers’ Professional Identity.” In Pluriligualism and Multiliteracies, edited by D. Abendroth-Timmer, and E.-M. Hennig, 191–208. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Fernández Sanjurjo, J., J. M. Arias Blanco, and A. Fernández-Costales. 2018. “Assessing the Influence of Socio-economic Status on Students’ Performance in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” System 73: 16–26.
  • Fillion, B. 1979. “Language Across the Curriculum: Examining the Place of Language in our Schools.” McGill Journal of Education 14 (1): 47–60.
  • Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. 1995. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
  • Halbach, A. 2014. “Teaching (in) the Foreign Language in a CLIL Context: Towards a new Approach.” In Integration of Theory and Practice in CLIL, edited by R. Breeze, et al., 1–14. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Halbach, A., and J. Iwaiec. 2020. “Responsible, Competent and with a Sense of Belonging: An Explanation of the Purported Levelling Effect of CLIL.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
  • Iwaniec, J., M. Fernández, L. Buckingham, and A. Halbach. forthcoming. The Effect of Bilingual Schooling in Madrid on SES: The Student Perspective.
  • Lamote, C., and N. Engels. 2010. “The Development of Student Teachers’ Professional Identity.” European Journal of Teacher Education 33: 3–18.
  • Leisen, J. 2016. “Sprachsensibilität im Fachunterricht.” Pädagogik Leben 2: 13–15.
  • Littleton, K., and N. Mercer. 2013. Interthinking. Putting Talk to Work. London: Routledge.
  • Lorenzo, F. 2019. Educación bilingüe en Andalucía. Informe de Gestión, Competencias y Organización. Sevilla: Agencia Andaluza de Evaluación Educativa. Consejería de Educación. Junta de Andalucía.
  • Lorenzo, F., A. Granados, and N. Rico. 2021. “Equity in Bilingual Education: Socioeconomic Status and Content and Language Integrated Learning in Monolingual Southern Europe.” Applied Linguistics 42 (3): 393–413.
  • Madrid Fernández, D., and S. P. Hughes. 2019. “CLIL and Language Education in Spain.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning in Spanish and Japanese Contexts. Policy, Practice, Pedagogy, edited by K. Tsuchiya, and M. D. Pérez Murillo, 11–36. London: Palgrave.
  • Meyer, O. 2010. “Towards Quality-CLIL: Successful Planning and Teaching Strategies.” PULSO. Revista de Educación 33: 11–29. https://revistas.cardenalcisneros.es/index.php/PULSO/article/view/92/68.
  • Meyer, O., D. Coyle, A. Halbach, T. Ting, and K. Schuck. 2015. “A Pluriliteracies Approach to Content and Language Integrated Learning: Developing Learner-progression in Academic Knowledge-construction and Meaning-making Through an Additional Language.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 41–57.
  • Moate, J. 2011. “The Impact of Foreign Language Mediated Teaching on Teachers’ Sense of Professional Integrity in the CLIL Classroom.” European Journal of Teacher Education 34 (3): 333–346.
  • Moate, J. 2013. Reconceptualising Teacherhood Through the Lens of Foreign-Language Mediation. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.
  • Morton, T. 2010. “Using a Genre-based Approach to Integrating Content and Language in CLIL: The Example of Secondary History.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 81–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Morton, T. 2012. “Teachers’ Knowledge About Language and Classroom Interaction in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” Doctoral thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/660387/morton_thomas.pdf?sequence=1.
  • Morton, T. 2019. “Teacher Education in Content-based Language Education.” In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, edited by S. Mann, and S. Walsh, 1st ed., 169–183. London: Routledge.
  • Nikula, T. 2017. “Emerging Themes, Further Research Directions.” In Applied Linguistic Perspectives on CLIL, edited by A. Llinares, and T. Morton, 307–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • OECD. 2013. TALIS Teacher Questionnaire. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2013-Teacher-questionnaire.pdf.
  • OECD. 2018. Education at a Glance. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2018-en.
  • Pappa, S., J. Moate, M. Ruohotie-Lyhty, and A. Eteläpelto. 2017b. “Teachers’ Pedagogical and Relational Identity Negotiation in the Finnish CLIL Context.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65: 61–70.
  • Pappa, S., J. Moate, M. Ruohotie-Lyhty, and A. Eteläpelto. 2019. “Teacher Agency Within the Finnish CLIL Context: Tensions and Resources.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (5): 593–613.
  • Pappa, S., J. Moate, M. Ruohotie-Lythy, and A. Eteläpelto. 2017a. “CLIL Teachers in Finland: The Role of Teachers’ Emotions in Professional Identity Negotiation.” Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies 11 (4): 79–99.
  • Pavón Vázquez, V., M. Prieto Molina, and F. J. Ávila López. 2015. “Perceptions of Teachers and Students of the Promotion of Interaction Through Task-based Activities in CLIL.” Porta Linguarum 23: 75–91.
  • Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2018a. “CLIL and Pedagogical Innovation: Fact or Fiction?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28: 369–390.
  • Pérez Cañado, M. L. 2018b. “The Effects of CLIL on L1 and Content Learning: Updated Empirical Evidence from Monolingual Contexts.” Learning and Instruction 57: 18–33.
  • Pérez Cañado, M. L. forthcoming. Inclusion and Diversity in Bilingual Education: A European Comparative Study.
  • Rascón Moreno, D. J., and C. M. Bretones Callejas. 2018. “Socioeconomic Status and its Impact on Language.” Porta Linguarum 29: 115–135.
  • San Isidro, X. 2018. “Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Implementation in Europe.” Theory Into Practice 57: 185–195.
  • San Isidro, X., and D. Lasagabaster. 2020. “Students’ and Families’ Attitudes and Motivations to Language Learning in CLIL: a Longitudinal Study.” The Language Learning Journal, doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1724185.
  • Schleicher, A. 2018, October 10. Las leyes educativas en España son casi del siglo XIX. (O. Sanmartín, Interviewer) Accessed July 31, 2020. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2018/10/10/5bbcf89de5fdead97c8b45ea.html.
  • Shepherd, E., and V. Ainsworth. 2017. English Impact. An Evaluation of English Language Capability. Accessed June 26, 2019. https://www.britishcouncil.es/sites/default/files/british-council-english-impact-report-madrid-web-opt.pdf.
  • Sirin, S. R. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research.” Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
  • Somers, T. 2018. “Multilingualism for Europeans, Monolingualism for Immigrants?” European Journal of Language Policy 10 (2): 203–228.
  • Sylvén, K. 2017. “Motivation, Second Language Learning and CLIL.” In Applied Linguistic Perspectives on CLIL, edited by A. Llinares, and T. Morton, 51–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Tardieu, C., and M. Dolitsky. 2012. “Integrating the Task-based Approach to CLIL Teaching.” In Teaching and Learning English Through Bilingual Education, edited by J. d. Martínez Agudo, 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
  • Tenenbaum, H. R., and M. D. Ruck. 2007. “Are Teachers’ Expectations Different for Racial Minority than for European American Students? A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2): 253–273. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253.
  • Uccelli, P., E. Demir-Lira, M. Rowe, S. Levine, and S. Goldin-Meadow. 2019. “Children's Early Decontextualized Talk Predicts Academic Language Proficiency in mid-Adolescence.” Child Development 90 (5): 1650–1663.
  • van Kampen, E., W. Admiraal, and A. Berry. 2018. “Content and Language Integrated Learning in the Netherlands: Teachers’ Self-Reported Pedagogical Practices.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (2): 222–236.
  • Weimer, M. 2002. Learner-centred Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.