Israeli Adults’ Non-take-up of Social Benefits: A Study Using the Socio-ecological Model

References

• Barnes, C. Y., & Henly, J. R. (2018). “They are underpaid and understaffed”: How clients interpret encounters with street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Epel, O., Elran-Barak, R., & Donchin, M. (2022). Social capital as a mediator and moderator in the association between loneliness and health, Israel as a case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, F. (2024). Take-up of social security benefits: Past, present – and future? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 32(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1332/17598273Y2023D000000005
   Google Scholar
• Bleikh, H. (2018). Poverty and inequality in Israel: Trends and decompositions. In A. Weiss (Ed.), State of the nation report: Society, economy and policy in Israel. Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Boscolo, S., & Gallo, G. (2023). The struggle of being poor and claimant: Evidence on the non-take-up of social policies in Italy. Italian Economic Journal, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-023-00230-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis) conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 6; pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics. (2015). The Social Survey 2013, Publication 1594. CBS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daigneault, P. M., & Macé, C. (2020). Program awareness, administrative burden, and non-take-up of Québec’s supplement to the work premium. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(6), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1636397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, Y., & Baden, C. (2020). Reframing community boundaries: The erosive power of new media spaces in authoritarian societies. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M., & Van Wolleghem, P. G. (2023). Do the most vulnerable know about income support policies? The case of the italian reddito d’inclusione (ReI). Italian Economic Journal, 9(2), 425–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elek-Ben, F., & Rafaeli, S. (2023). Non-take-up of benefits and rights: The universality-selectivity debate as reflected in online information and user patterns. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2023, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8830139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound. (2015). Access to social benefits: Reducing non-take-up. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., Carvallo, M., Lee, J., & Bernier, I. (2021). Honor and seeking mental health services: The roles of stigma and reputation concerns. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.4.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, J., & Madhela, S. (2018). The welfare system—an overview. In A. Weiss (Ed.), State of the nation report: Society, economy and policy in Israel 2018 (pp. 257–272). Taub Canter for Social Policy Studies in Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Gilad, S., & Assouline, M. (2022). Citizens’ choice to voice in response to administrative burdens. International Public Management Journal, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2072988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedemé, T., & Janssens, J. (2020). The concept and measurement of non-take-up: An overview with a focus on the non-take-up of social benefits, Deliverable 9.2 Leuven, InGRID-2 project 730998 H. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24515.43048
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, D. (2021). Exhaustion of social rights in Israel: Research findings. Social Security, 113, 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. T., Lundberg, K., & Syltevik, L. J. (2018). Digitalization, street-level bureaucracy and welfare users’ experiences. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattke, F., Hensel, D., & Kalucza, J. (2020). Emotional responses to bureaucratic red tape. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernanz, V., Malherbet, F., & Pellizzari, M. (2004). Take-up of welfare benefits in OECD countries: A review of the evidence. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Holler, R. (2019). “Rebuilding a shattered life and a broken body”: Social work and disability discourses in Israel’s first decades. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(2), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, R. (2020). Material, stigmatic, and agentic dimensions in the experience of claiming disability benefits: The Israeli case. Social Policy & Administration, 54(5), 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, R., & Benish, A. (2022). Into the promised land: Modelling the role of take-up agents in realising welfare rights. Social Policy and Society, 21(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746420000548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, R., & Tarshish, N. (2022). Administrative burden in citizen-state encounters: The role of waiting, communication breakdowns and administrative errors. Social Policy and Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, J., & van Mechelen, N. (2022). To take or not to take? An overview of the factors contributing to the non-take-up of public provisions. European Journal of Social Security, 24(2), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262722110680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, J., Goedemé, T., & Ponnet, K. (2021). The claiming costs scale: A new instrument for measuring the costs potential beneficiaries face when claiming social benefits. PLoS One, 16(8), e0256438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klonover, E., Maytles, R., Trachtingot, I., & Bergman, Y. S. (2023). Sense of community, meaning in life, and satisfaction with life among ultra-orthodox Jews: A mediation model. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, W., & Moffitt, R. A. (2023). Take-up of social benefits. In K. F. Zimmermann (Ed.), Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_372-1
   Google Scholar
• Kühner, S., & Chou, K.-L. (2023). To claim or not to claim: Investigating non-take-up of welfare schemes targeting Hong Kong older adults and the stigma attached to them. Journal of Social Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnirovich, N. (2018). Wage gap paradox: The case of immigrants from the FSU in Israel. International Migration, 56(5), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavee, E., Cohen, N., & Nouman, H. (2018). Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats’ engagement in policy design. Public Administration, 96(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., Bonvin, J. M., & Hümbelin, O. (2021). The non-take-up of health and social benefits: What implications for social citizenship? Swiss Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2021-0013
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L., & Raniolo, F. (2017). The impact of the economic crisis on South European democracies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ne’eman-Haviv, V. (2021). Honor killings in muslim and western countries in modern times: A critical literature review and definitional implications. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 13(3), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K., & Nieuwenhuis, R. (2019). Analysing benefit coverage: A new framework, Deliverable 9.1. InGRID-2 project 730998 - H2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L., Nielsen, H. Ø., & Bisgaard, M. (2021). Citizen reactions to bureaucratic encounters: Different ways of coping with public authorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennerstorfer, A., & Österle, A. (2023). Take-up and distribution of a universal cash benefit: The case of the Austrian long-term cae allowance. Journal of Social Policy, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. (2022). Socio-demographic predictors of e-government use in later life: Results from the Israel Social Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 37(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-022-09448-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint Arnault, D. M. (2018). Defining and theorizing about culture: The evolution of the cultural determinants of help seeking—revised. Nursing Research, 67(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutter, D. (2022). Non-take-up of rights in the contest of social protection. United Nations, General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Shuraydi, A. M. (2020). “I’m stamped a liar on my heart:” Challenges of qualitative research on Arab and Arab-American drug user populations. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 8(4) https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2022.2086955
   Google Scholar
• Simanainen, M. (2021). The bureaucracy of claiming benefits. In Experimenting with unconditional basic income (pp. 106–115). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K., & Townley, G. (2020). How far have we come? An integrative review of the current literature on sense of community and well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(1-2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strier, R., & Werner, P. (2016). Tracing stigma in long-term care insurance in Israel: Stakeholders’ views of policy implementation. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 28(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1111726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szeintuch, S. (2022). Homeless without benefits: The non-take-up problem. Housing Studies, 37(5), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1823330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarshish, N. (2023). “Bottom line is you deserve these things”: Experiences of social security claimants as lessons for take-up advocacy. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(4), 2237–2255. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarshish, N., & Holler, R. (2021). Barriers and strategies for exercising rights: The point of view of recipients of National Insurance benefits. Social Security, 113, 49–77.
   Google Scholar
• Trappenburg, M., Kampen, T., & Tonkens, E. (2020). Social workers in a modernising welfare state: Professionals or street-level bureaucrats? The British Journal of Social Work, 50(6), 1669–1687. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gestel, R. A. F., Goedemé, T. I. M., Janssens, J., Lefevere, E. V. A., & Lemkens, R. I. K. (2023). Improving take-up by reaching out to potential beneficiaries. Insights from, a large-scale field experiment in Belgium. Journal of Social Policy, 52(4), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727942100088X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mechelen, N., & Janssens, J. (2017). Who Is to Blame? An Overview of the Factors Contributing to the Non-Take-Up Of Social Rights. No 1708, Working Papers Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W. (1991). Non-take up of social security benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 1(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100103
   Google Scholar
• Warin, P., & Lucas, B. (2020). Non take up: A critical analysis category. Working Paper 26. Grenoble: Observatoire des non-recours.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., & Gal, J. (2009). Realizing rights in social work. Social Service Review, 83(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1086/599982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar