Classical and Bayesian Inference of Unit Gompertz Distribution Based on Progressively Type II Censored Data

References

• Abouammoh, A., & Alshingiti, A. M. (2009). Reliability estimation of generalized inverted exponential distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 79(11), 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650802261095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hussaini, E. K. (1999). Predicting observables from a general class of distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 79(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(98)00228-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hussaini, E. K., Abdel-Hamid, A. H., & Hashem, A. F. (2015). One-sample bayesian prediction intervals based on progressively type-ii censored data from the half-logistic distribution under progressive stress model. Metrika, 78(7), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-014-0526-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almetwally, E. M., & Almongy, H. M. (2019). Maximum product spacing and Bayesian method for parameter estimation for generalized power Weibull distribution under censoring scheme. Journal of Data Science, 17(2), 407–444. https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.201904_17(2).0010
   Google Scholar
• Anatolyev, S., & Kosenok, G. (2005). An alternative to maximum likelihood based on spacings. Econometric Theory, 21(02), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466605050255
   Google Scholar
• Anis, M., & De, D. (2020). Some more properties of the unit-gompertz distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.06439.
   Google Scholar
• Arabi Belaghi, R., Noori Asl, M., & Singh, S. (2017). On estimating the parameters of the burr xii model under progressive type-i interval censoring. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87(16), 3132–3151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2017.1359600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, B. C., & Press, S. J. (1983). Bayesian inference for pareto populations. Journal of Econometrics, 21(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(83)90047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad, M., J., Azhad, Q., Gupta, N., & Pathak, A. K. (2023). Bayesian inference of unit Gompertz distribution based on dual generalized order statistics. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 52(8), 3657–3675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashour, S. K., El-Sheikh, A. A., & Elshahhat, A. (2020). Inferences and optimal censoring schemes for progressively first-failure censored nadarajah-haghighi distribution. Sankhya A, 84(2), 885–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-019-00175-2
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., Beutner, E., & Cramer, E. (2010). Exact two-sample nonparametric confidence, prediction, and tolerance intervals based on ordinary and progressively type-ii right censored data. TEST, 19(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-008-0133-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., & Sandhu, R. (1995). A simple simulational algorithm for generating progressive type-ii censored samples. The American Statistician, 49(2), 229–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-H., & Shao, Q.-M. (1999). Monte carlo estimation of bayesian credible and hpd intervals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8(1), 69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, R., & Amin, N. (1983). Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 45(3), 394–403.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, R., & Traylor, L. (1995). Non-regular maximum likelihood problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen, F., & Newby, M. (1990). A note on the use of the product of spacings in Bayesian inference. Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, S., & Dey, T. (2014). On progressively censored generalized inverted exponential distribution. Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(12), 2557–2576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2014.922165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, S., Dey, T., & Luckett, D. J. (2016). Statistical inference for the generalized inverted exponential distribution based on upper record values. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 120, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2015.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, S., Singh, S., Tripathi, Y. M., & Asgharzadeh, A. (2016). Estimation and prediction for a progressively censored generalized inverted exponential distribution. Statistical Methodology, 32, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2016.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Diebolt, J., & Celeux, G. (1993). Asymptotic properties of a stochastic em algorithm for estimating mixing proportions. Stochastic Models, 9(4), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326349308807283
   Google Scholar
• Dube, M., Krishna, H., & Garg, R. (2016). Generalized inverted exponential distribution under progressive first-failure censoring. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 86(6), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2015.1052440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumonceaux, R., & Antle, C. E. (1973). Discrimination between the log-normal and the weibull distributions. Technometrics, 15(4), 923–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1973.10489124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science, 1(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013815
   Google Scholar
• El-Sherpieny, E.-S A., Almetwally, E. M., & Muhammed, H. Z. (2020). Progressive type-ii hybrid censored schemes based on maximum product spacing with application to power lomax distribution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 553, 124251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Déniz, E., Sordo, M. A., & Calderín-Ojeda, E. (2014). The log–lindley distribution as an alternative to the beta regression model with applications in insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 54, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R. D., & Kundu, D. (2006). On the comparison of fisher information of the Weibull and ge distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136(9), 3130–3144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2004.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, M. K., Dey, S., Alotaibi, R. M., & Tripathi, Y. M. (2020). Reliability estimation of a multicomponent stress-strength model for unit gompertz distribution under progressive type ii censoring. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 36(3), 965–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, M. K., Dey, S., & Tripathi, Y. M. (2019). Reliability estimation in a multicomponent stress–strength based on unit-gompertz distribution. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(3), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2019-0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotb, M. S., & Raqab, M. Z. (2019). Statistical inference for modified weibull distribution based on progressively type-ii censored data. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 162, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., Dey, S., Ormoz, E., & MirMostafaee, S. (2020). Inference for the unit-gompertz model based on record values and inter-record times with an application. Rendiconti Del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2, 69(3), 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-019-00471-8
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, P. (1980). A generalized probability density function for double-bounded random processes. Journal of Hydrology, 46(1-2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(80)90036-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D., & Pradhan, B. (2009). Estimating the parameters of the generalized exponential distribution in presence of hybrid censoring. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 38(12), 2030–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920802192505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazucheli, J., Menezes, A. F. B., & Dey, S. (2019). Unit-Gompertz distribution with applications. Statistica, 79, 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazucheli, J., Menezes, A. F. B., & Dey, S. (2018a). Improved maximum-likelihood estimators for the parameters of the unit-gamma distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 47(15), 3767–3778. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1361993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazucheli, J., Menezes, A. F., & Dey, S. (2018b). The unit-birnbaum-saunders distribution with applications. Chilean Journal of Statistics, 9(1), 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazucheli, J., Menezes, A., & Ghitany, M. (2018). The unit-weibull distribution and associated inference. Journal of Applied Probability an Statistics, 13(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mousa, M. A., & Jaheen, Z. (2002). Bayesian prediction for progressively censored data from the burr model. Statistical Papers, 43(4), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-002-0126-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, M., Dey, S., & Kumar, D. (2018). A new generalization of the exponentiated pareto distribution with an application. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 37(3), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2017.1396942
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, B., & Kundu, D. (2013). Inference and optimal censoring schemes for progressively censored birnbaum–saunders distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 143(6), 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranneby, B. (1984). The maximum spacing method. An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood method. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11(2), 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, T., Tripathi, Y. M., & Bhattacharya, R. (2018). Statistical inference and optimum life testing plans under type-ii hybrid censoring scheme. Annals of Data Science, 5(4), 679–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-018-0158-z
   Google Scholar
• Shakhatreh, M. K., Dey, S., & Kumar, D. (2022). Inverse Lindley power series distributions: A new compounding family and regression model with censored data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 49(13), 3451–3476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2021.1951683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Tripathi, Y. M. (2018). Estimating the parameters of an inverse Weibull distribution under progressive type-i interval censoring. Statistical Papers, 59(1), 21–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-016-0750-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan, K., Alsadat, N., & Kundu, D. (2014). Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimations of the inverse weibull parameters under progressive type-ii censoring. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 84(10), 2248–2265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2013.788652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregouet, D., Escolano, S., Tiret, L., Mallet, A., & Golmard, J. (2004). A new algorithm for haplotype-based association analysis: The stochastic-em algorithm. Annals of Human Genetics, 68(Pt 2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00085.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, F.-K., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Em algorithm for estimating the burr xii parameters with multiple censored data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 26(6), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. C., & Tanner, M. A. (1990). A monte carlo implementation of the em algorithm and the poor man’s data augmentation algorithms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(411), 699–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10474930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willekens, F. (2001). Gompertz in context: The gompertz and related distributions. In Forecasting Mortality in Developed Countries (pp. 105–126). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A. S., Maiti, S. S., & Saha, M. (2021). The inverse xgamma distribution: Statistical properties and different methods of estimation. Annals of Data Science, 8(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-019-00211-w
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Ye, Z., & Xie, M. (2014). A stochastic em algorithm for progressively censored data analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(5), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar