Moral foundations and perceptions of rape in Colombia (Fundamentos morales y percepciones del abuso sexual en Colombia)

References / Referencias

• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes, B., Daveson, B., Ramsenthaler, C., Benalia, H., Ferreira, P., Bausewein, C., & Higginson, I. (2012). The Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS)–Manual for cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. Cicely Saunders Institute. https://pos-pal.org/doct/Manual_for_crosscultural_adaptation_and_psychometric_validation_of_the_POS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., & Reed, A., II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbio, A., Nencini, A., & Sarrica, M. (2011). Il Moral foundation questionnaire: Analisi della struttura fattoriale della versione italiana [The moral foundations questionnaire: Analysis of the Italian version’s factorial structure]. Giornale di Psicologia, 5(1–2), 7–18. https://www.academia.edu/download/30871765/GiornaleDiPsicologia.2011.5.1–2.pdf#page=9
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Eyssel, F., & Süssenbach, P. (2023). Modern myths about sexual aggression: New methods and findings. In M. A. H. Horvath & J. M. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking – 10 years on (pp. 159–171). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borja Orozco, H., Barreto, I., Sabucedo, J. M., & López, W. L. (2009). Construcción del discurso deslegitimador del adversario: Gobierno y paramilitarismo en Colombia [Building a discourse to delegitimize the opponent: Government and paramilitarism in Colombia]. Universitas Psychologica, 7(2), 571–583. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rups/v7n2/v7n2a20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, M., Meza, P., Lagues, K., & Yañez, S. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social (SDO) en una muestra chilena [Adaptation and validation of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDO) in a Chilean sample]. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-1.aveo
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, M., & Parra, L. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la versión abreviada de la Escala de Autoritarismos de Derechas (RWA) en una muestra chilena [Adaptation and validation of the short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) in a Chilean sample]. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17098
   Google Scholar
• Curry, O. S., Chesters, M. J., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garay, J. (2003). Crisis, exclusión social y democratización en Colombia. Prospectiva, 8, 51–77.
   Google Scholar
• Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). A different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2007). Social intuitionists reason, as a normal part of conversation. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Volume 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 241–254). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021). Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1303–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iurino, K., & Saucier, G. (2020). Testing measurement invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries. Assessment, 27(2), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118817916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2009, January). Left & right, right & wrong: A system justification analysis of ideology and morality. In Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Psychology and genetic epistemology (pp. 151–235). New York Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi, P., Süssenbach, P., Bohner, G., & Megías, J. L. (2020). The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, L., & Young, L. (2016). When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Profamilia and Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2017). Encuesta nacional de demografía y salud, ENDS 2015. Tomo II. Componente de salud sexual y reproductiva [National demography and health survey, ENDS 2015. Volume II. Component of sexual and reproductive health]. https://profamilia.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ENDS-2015-TOMO-II.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Sánchez, M., López Megas, J., Carretero-Dios, H., & Rincón Neira, L. (2013). Colombian version of the acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: First psychometric analyses. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(1), 121–134. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-05342013000100009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süssenbach, P., & Bohner, G. (2011). Acceptance of sexual aggression myths in a representative sample of German residents. Aggressive Behavior, 37(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vecina, M. L., & Piñuela, R. (2017). Relationships between ambivalent sexism and the five moral foundations in domestic violence: Is it a matter of fairness and authority? The Journal of Psychology, 151(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar