Multistakeholder regional dialogues as catalysers for transboundary water cooperation

References

• Barua, A. (2018). Water diplomacy as an approach to regional cooperation in South Asia: A case from the Brahmaputra basin. Journal of Hydrology, 567, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The qualitative report. Joint and operations analysis division DSTO Defence Science and Technology Organisation. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008
   Google Scholar
• Beerhalter, S. (2018, October 27). The Nexus Regional Dialogues (NRD) programme implementing and mainstreaming the water-energy-food security nexus in five regions. DEVCO Environment Week. https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/library/nexus-regional-dialogues-nrd-programme-sarah-beerhalter_en
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Woodhill, J., Hemmati, M., Verhoosel, K., & van Vugt, S. (2015). The MSP guide: How to design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships (1st ed.). Centre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR. https://edepot.wur.nl/358948
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, J. H., Hiemstra, W., van Vugt, S. M., & Walters, H. (2013). Analysing stakeholder power dynamics in multi-stakeholder processes: Insights of practice from Africa and Asia. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 9(3), 11–31. http://journal.km4dev.org/index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/153/252
   Google Scholar
• Chatham House. (2022, August 26). Chatham House rule. Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank. https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule
   Google Scholar
• Cheyns, E. (2011). Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture: Limits of the ‘inclusiveness’ paradigm. Governing through Standards. https://www.academia.edu/76909206/Multi_stakeholder_Initiatives_for_Sustainable_Agriculture_Limits_of_the_Inclusiveness_Paradigm
   Google Scholar
• DABLAS. (2023). ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River. Retrieved November 24, 2023, from https://www.icpdr.org/danube-basin/receiving-sea-black-sea/black-sea/dablas
   Google Scholar
• Dore, J. (2007). Mekong region water-related MSPs – Unfulfilled potential. In J. Warner (Ed.), Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management (1st ed., pp. 205–235). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315596396
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). European Union strategy for Danube region ( COM/2010/0715, 199962). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52010DC0715
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy ( 2000/60/EC, EP, CONSIL, 327 OJ L (2000)). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj/eng
   Google Scholar
• GEF IW:LEARN and Global Environment Facility. (2018). Methodological approach for the establishment and sustaining of a regional dialogue and community of practice on transboundary water resource management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://iwlearn.net/resolveuid/94147002-f092-4da1-b93e-3af49afdb508
   Google Scholar
• Global Environment Facility. (2019). Integrated transboundary river basin management for the sustainable development of the Limpopo river basin. Project Identication Form (PIF) entry – Full Sized Project – GEF - 7. https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/web-documents/10182_IW_PIF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership Southern Africa. (2018). SADC multi-stakeholder water dialogue. Final project report 2012–2017, support to SADC multi-stakeholder water dialogue. component 3. Support to SADC’s water division for the regional support programme water management in the SADC region 2012–2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., & Purdy, J. (2018). Collaborating for our future: Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782841.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• GWP-Med. (2016). The Drin Coordinated Action—DRIN CORDA. Drin CORDA, GWP-Med. http://drincorda.iwlearn.org/drin-coordinated-action/the-drin-mou-implementation-1
   Google Scholar
• Hanasz, P. (2017). Transboundary water governance and international actors in South Asia: The Ganges– Brahmaputra–Meghna basin. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315104836/transboundary-watergovernance-international-actors-south-asia-paula-hanasz
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In H. Wagenaar & M. A. Hajer (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490934.003
   Google Scholar
• Kabeya, P. K., Mndzebele, D., Ntlamelle, M., Samikwa, D., Simalabwi, A., Takawira, A., Jembere, K., & Kumbirai, S. (2022). A regional approach to implementing the WEF nexus: A case study of the Southern African Development Community. Water - Energy - Food Nexus Narratives and Resource Securities, 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91223-5.00017-4
   Google Scholar
• Matin, N. (2008). Specification of mechanisms and tools for multistakeholder dialogue processes on poverty and gender in river basin planning (Report of the Newater Project – new approaches to adaptive water management under uncertainty D 2.4.2; p. 30). Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York. https://www.newater.uni-osnabrueck.de/deliverables/D242%20Specification%20of%20mechanisms%20and%20tools%20for%20multi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mekong River Commission. (2010). Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Mekong River Commission Secretariat and the ASEAN Secretariat. MRC Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.52107/mrc.ajhypd
   Google Scholar
• Mohtar, R. H., & Daher, B. (2016). Water-energy-food nexus framework for facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue. Water International, 41(5), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1149759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nexus Resource Platform. (2020). Nexus news // water and energy ministers meeting approves the SADC wef-nexus governance framework developed by GWPSA. Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://www.water-energy-food.org/fr/news/nexus-event-joint-meeting-of-sadc-water-and-energy-ministers-meeting-approves-the-sadc-wef-nexus-governance-framework-developed-by-gwpsa
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, B., Burnley, C., Mugisha, S., Madzudzo, E., Oeur, I., Mam, K., Rüttinger, L., Chilufya, L., & Adriázola, P. (2018). Investing in multi-stakeholder dialogue to address natural resource competition and conflict. Development in Practice, 28(6), 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1478950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, B. D., & Stafford Smith, M. (2020). Multi-stakeholder dialogue for transformational change. A STAP advisory document. Scientific and Technical advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility. https://stapgef.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/54349%20STAP%20Multi-stakeholder%20dialogue%20WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sauvage, N. B., Tremblay-Lévesque, S. L. C., Giorio, S. L., Herron, C., & Glennie, S. P. (2021). Multi-stakeholder consultation processes for sdg 6 monitoring. Global Water Partnership. https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/activities/act-on-sdg6/microsite/msps-for-sdg-6-monitoring_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sigalla, O. Z., Tumbo, M., & Joseph, J. (2021). Multi-stakeholder platform in water resources management: A critical analysis of stakeholders’ participation for sustainable water resources. Sustainability, 13(16), 9260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern African Development Community. (2000). Revised protocol on shared watercourses. https://www.ecolex.org/details/treaty/revised-protocol-on-shared-watercourses-tre-001360/
   Google Scholar
• Southern African Development Community. (2016). SADC regional strategic action plan on integrated water resources development and management RSAP IV – (2016 – 2020). https://www.sadc.int/sites/default/files/2021-08/SADC_Water_4th_Regional_Strategic_Action_Plan_English_version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Southern African Development Community. (2020). SADC joint meeting of ministers responsible for energy and water hosted by the Republic of Mozambique through video conference. Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://www.sadc.int/latest-news/sadc-joint-meeting-ministers-responsible-energy-and-water-hosted-republic-mozambique
   Google Scholar
• Southern African Development Community. (2022). SADC regional water strategy 2006. https://www.sadc.int/document/regional-water-strategy-2006
   Google Scholar
• Southern African Development Community. (n.d.). ‘Water | SADC’. Southern African Development Community (SADC). Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://www.sadc.int/pillars/water-0
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, J. G., Bernardini, F., Kauppi, L., Koeppel, S., & Matthews, J. 2023. The water convention, a multilateral environmental agreement as community of practice. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 26(2), 87–95. Also available at: The Water Convention, a multilateral environmental agreement as community of practice | Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management | Scholarly Publishing Collective. https://doi.org/10.14321/aehm.026.02.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay-Lévesque, L. C., Warner, J., Gribanenkova, I., & Robbins, M. (2022). The MSP sourcebook: A guide for multi-stakeholder partnerships in water management. Global Water Partnership Organization. Also available at: the-msp-sourcebook.pdf (gwp.org)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2011). The Drin: a strategic shared vision memorandum of understanding for the management of the extended transboundary Drin basin. https://unece.org/DAM/oes/MOU/MOU_Drin_Strategic_Shared_vision_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Verzosa, C. C., & Fiutak, T. R. (2019). The “How” of multi-stakeholder engagement. Governance Brief No. 35. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/499181/governance-brief-035-how-multi-stakeholder-engagement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (Ed.). (2007). Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315596396
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. F. 2006. More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620500404992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2018). South Asia Water Initiative: Annual report (July 2017 – June 2018). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/799921573109686061/pdf/South-Asia-Water-Initiative-SAWI-Annual-Report-for-July-2017-June-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2019). South Asia Water Initiative: Annual report (July 2018 – June 2019). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank Group https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/266401578643583738/pdf/South-Asia-Water-Initiative-SAWI-Annual-Report-for-July-2018-June-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2020). South Asia Water Initiative: Annual report (July 2019 – June 2020). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/720411611563614917/pdf/South-Asia-Water-Initiative-SAWI-Annual-Report-for-July-2019-June-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2022). From source to sea: 2013–2021 South Asia Water Initiative completion report. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099312405272210424/pdf/IDU0274da53607b1704a6c0beba048461972fe3e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda, Y., Aich, D., Hill, D., Huntjens, P., & Swain, A. (2017). Transboundary water cooperation over the Brahmaputra River: Legal political economy analysis of current and future potential cooperation. The Hague Institute for Global Justice. https://siwi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/brahmaputra-basin-report-final_design.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda, Y., Faloutsos, D., Demydenko, Y., Tremblay-Levesque, L., Jendrek, L., Shukla, A., Gribanenkova, I., & Oravcova, M. (2022). Multi-stakeholder regional dialogues: Pathways for advancing transboundary water cooperation. Global Water Partnership. https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/about-gwp/publications/msps/msps-transboundary-cooperation.pdf
   Google Scholar