972
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of internal and external adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification

, , , , , , & show all
Article: 2211268 | Received 16 Jan 2023, Accepted 02 May 2023, Published online: 18 May 2023

References

  • Gordts S, Grimbizis G, Campo R. Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):380–388.e1.
  • Upson K, Missmer SA. Epidemiology of adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(2–03):89–107.
  • Levy G, Dehaene A, Laurent N, et al. An update on adenomyosis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(1):3–25.
  • Peric H, Fraser IS. The symptomatology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):547–555.
  • Bourdon M, Santulli P, Marcellin L, et al. Adenomyosis: an update regarding its diagnosis and clinical features. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(10):102228.
  • Lou J, Huang X, Zhang L, et al. The second generation endometrial ablation (NovaSure) improves efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in management of adenomyosis. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019;48(2):136–141.
  • Younes G, Tulandi T. Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):483–490.e3.
  • Sudderuddin S, Helbren E, Telesca M, et al. MRI appearances of benign uterine disease. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(11):1095–1104.
  • O’Shea A, Figueiredo G, Lee SI. Imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(2–03):119–128.
  • Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114.e1–114.e7.
  • de Bruijn AM, Smink M, Lohle PNM, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(12):1629–1642.e1.
  • Liang E, Brown B, Kirsop R, et al. Efficacy of uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis - an interim report on an Australian experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(2):106–112.
  • Liu X, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. Clinical predictors of long-term success in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(3):e2443.
  • Li X, Zhu X, He S, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the management of adenomyosis: long-term results from a single center. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):241–247.
  • Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(6):707–714.
  • Marques ALS, Andres MP, Kho RM, et al. Is high-intensity focused ultrasound effective for the treatment of adenomyosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):332–343.
  • Chen J, Chen W, Zhang L, et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:671–676.
  • Huang YF, Deng J, Wei XL, et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes of patients with adenomyosis and infertility treated with High-Intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic excision. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):301–307.
  • Liu Y, Zhang WW, He M, et al. Adverse effect analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign uterine diseases. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):56–61.
  • Shui L, Mao S, Wu Q, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for adenomyosis: two-year follow-up results. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:677–681.
  • Gong C, Wang Y, Lv F, et al. Evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for different types of adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):530–538.
  • Fan TY, Zhang L, Chen W, et al. Feasibility of MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3624–3630.
  • Li F, Wang Z, Du Y, et al. Study on therapeutic dosimetry of HIFU ablation tissue. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2006;23(4):839–843.
  • Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, et al. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):707–714.
  • Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, et al. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):290–300.
  • Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):349–357.
  • Keserci B, Duc NM. Magnetic resonance imaging features influencing high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis with a nonperfused volume ratio of ≥90% as a measure of clinical treatment success: retrospective multivariate analysis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):626–636.
  • Chen L, ter Haar G, Hill CR. Influence of ablated tissue on the formation of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23(6):921–931.
  • Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1393–1401.
  • Khan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, et al. Biological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis with coexisting deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(2):343–353.
  • Kor E, Mostafavi SRS, Mazhin ZA, et al. Relationship between the severity of endometriosis symptoms (dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain) and the spread of the disease on ultrasound. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):546.