1,449
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

Uterine rupture after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis: a case report and literature review

, , , &
Article: 2212885 | Received 21 Feb 2023, Accepted 07 May 2023, Published online: 22 May 2023

References

  • Upson K, Missmer SA. Epidemiology of adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(2–03):89–107.
  • Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A)-pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;40:68–81.
  • Bachu VS, Kedda J, Suk I, et al. High-Intensity focused ultrasound: a review of mechanisms and clinical applications. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49(9):1975–1991.
  • Marques ALS, Andres MP, Kho RM, et al. Is high-intensity focused ultrasound effective for the treatment of adenomyosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):332–343.
  • Shui L, Mao S, Wu Q, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for adenomyosis: two-year follow-up results. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:677–681.
  • Xiong Y, Yue Y, Shui L, et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for the treatment of patients with adenomyosis and prior abdominal surgical scars: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(7):777–783.
  • Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(6):707–714.
  • Nam JH. Pregnancy and symptomatic relief following ultrasound-guided transvaginal radiofrequency ablation in patients with adenomyosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(1):124–132.
  • Huang YF, Deng J, Wei XL, et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes of patients with adenomyosis and infertility treated with High-Intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic excision. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):301–307.
  • Li X-W, Liang M-Y, Wang J-L, et al. Spontaneous uterine rupture during late pregnancy after high-intensity focused ultrasound. Chin Med J. 2015;128(10):1419.
  • Lai THT, Seto MTY, Cheung VYT. Intrapartum uterine rupture following ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroid and adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(6):816–817.
  • Lynn JG, Zwemer RL, Chick AJ, et al. A new method for the generation and use of focused ultrasound in experimental biology. J Gen Physiol. 1942;26(2):179–193.
  • Foley JL, Vaezy S, Crum LA. Applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound in medicine: spotlight on neurological applications. Appl Acoust. 2007;68(3):245–259.
  • Lee JS, Hong GY, Lee KH, et al. Safety and efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3214–3221.
  • Jeng CJ, Ou KY, Long CY, et al. 500 Cases of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablated uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(6):865–871.
  • Zhang X, Li K, Xie B, et al. Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):207–211.
  • Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392–411.
  • Szubert M, Koziróg E, Olszak O, et al. Adenomyosis and infertility-review of medical and surgical approaches. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1235.
  • Liu L, Tian H, Lin D, et al. Risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(4):711–723.
  • Jiang L, Han Y, Song Z, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;2023:S1553-4650(23)00113-9.
  • Yang X, Zhang X, Lin B, et al. Combined therapeutic effects of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for the treatment of severe adenomyosis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):486–492.
  • Guo Q, Xu F, Ding Z, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: a comparative study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):505–509.
  • Liu Y, Zhang WW, He M, et al. Adverse effect analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign uterine diseases. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):56–61.
  • Vandenberghe G, Bloemenkamp K, Berlage S, et al. The international network of obstetric survey systems study of uterine rupture: a descriptive multi-country population-based study. BJOG. 2019;126(3):370–381.
  • ACOG Practice bulletin no. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110–e127.
  • Kishi Y, Yabuta M, Taniguchi F. Who will benefit from uterus-sparing surgery in adenomyosis-associated subfertility? Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):802–807.e1.
  • Saremi A, Bahrami H, Salehian P, et al. Treatment of adenomyomectomy in women with severe uterine adenomyosis using a novel technique. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(6):753–760.
  • Sugiyama M, Takahashi H, Baba Y, et al. Perinatal outcome of pregnancy after adenomyomectomy: summary of 10 cases with a brief literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(24):4145–4149.
  • Rabinovici J, Inbar Y, Eylon SC, et al. Pregnancy and live birth after focused ultrasound surgery for symptomatic focal adenomyosis: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(5):1255–1259.
  • Zhou CY, Xu XJ, He J. Pregnancy outcomes and symptom improvement of patients with adenomyosis treated with high intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;51(11):845–849.