Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients with different types of adenomyosis treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound

References

• Szubert M, Kozirog E, Olszak O, et al. Adenomyosis and infertility-review of medical and surgical approaches. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Res. 2019;8:283. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17242.1.
   Google Scholar
• Harada T, Khine YM, Kaponis A, et al. The impact of adenomyosis on women’s fertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(9):557–568. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A)-pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;40:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(6):730–736. doi: 10.1002/uog.14834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdon M, Santulli P, Marcellin L, et al. Adenomyosis: an update regarding its diagnosis and clinical features. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(10):102228. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senturk LM, Imamoglu M. Adenomyosis: what is new?. Womens Health . 2015;11(5):717–724. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.60.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg VH, Arbib N, Schiff E, et al. Sonographic signs of adenomyosis are prevalent in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis and may suggest a higher risk of infertility. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8967803. doi: 10.1155/2017/8967803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazot M, Darai E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, et al. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–1384. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.512061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):107 e1-6–107.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandeparkar MS, Jalkote S, Panpalia M, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of subtle nuances of uterine adenomyosis in infertility. Global Reproductive Health. 2018;3(3):e14–e14. doi: 10.1097/GRH.0000000000000014.
   Google Scholar
• Sudderuddin S, Helbren E, Telesca M, et al. MRI appearances of benign uterine disease. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(11):1095–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.05.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoutt LM, Flynn SD, Luthringer DJ, et al. Junctional zone of the uterus: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology. 1991;179(2):403–407. doi: 10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring M, Chen TY, Isaacson KB. A systematic review of adenomyosis: it is time to reassess what we thought we knew about the disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):644–655. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’shea A, Figueiredo G, Lee SI. Imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(2–03):119–128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114 e1–114 e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong C, Wang Y, Lv F, et al. Evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for different types of adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):530–538. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2052366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Zhu S, Liang X. Conservative surgical and drug therapies for adenomyosis medicine. Reprod Biol. 2022;22(3):100664. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhu X, He S, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the management of adenomyosis: long-term results from a single center . Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):241–247. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1886347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YF, Deng J, Wei XL, et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes of patients with adenomyosis and infertility treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic excision. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):301–307. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1742390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham JM, O’brien PM, Shaw RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(8):734–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourdon M, Santulli P, Oliveira J, et al. Focal adenomyosis is associated with primary infertility. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(6):1271–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Li H, Yu Q, et al. Association betweensubtypes ofadenomyosis andreproductive outcomes. J Reprod Med. 2020;29(2):155–161. in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1393–1401. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildt L, Kissler S, Licht P, et al. Sperm transport in the human female genital tract and its modulation by oxytocin as assessed by hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, hysterotonography, electrohysterography and doppler sonography. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(5):655–666. doi: 10.1093/humupd/4.5.655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissler S, Zangos S, Wiegratz I, et al. Utero-tubal sperm transport and its impairment in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:38–48. doi: 10.1196/annals.1389.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Chen Y, Lai M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging–guided focused ultrasound surgery in a swine adenomyosis model. Acad Radiol. 2023:S1076-6332(22)00639-0.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Hong GY, Lee KH, et al. Changes in anti-mullerian hormone levels as a biomarker for ovarian reserve after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis and uterine fibroid. BJOG. 2017;124(Suppl 3):18–22. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keserci B, Duc NM. Magnetic resonance imaging features influencing high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis with a nonperfused volume ratio of >/=90% as a measure of clinical treatment success: retrospective multivariate analysis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):626–636. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1516301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won S, Hwang JY, Lee N, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone level may predict successful pregnancy after adenomyomectomy in patients with infertility due to adenomyosis. Medicine. 2021;100(21):e26075. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedachenko N, Anagnostis P, Shemelko T, et al. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone, prolactin and estradiol concentrations in infertile women with endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(2):162–165. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1855634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Moon HM, Lee MK, et al. The expression of mullerian inhibiting substance/anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor in myoma and adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(1):127–134. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qin J, Chen JY, Zhao WP, et al. Outcome of unintended pregnancy after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(3):273–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar