Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Hyperthermia Volume 40, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
651
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of menstruation recovery after ultrasound-guided suction curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy pretreated using high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization

Yu Daia State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China;b Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. ChinaView further author information
,
Yan Pengb Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. ChinaView further author information
,
Qiuling Shia State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China;c School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Ping Jina State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China;b Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Zhibiao Wanga State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Article: 2241686 | Received 23 May 2023, Accepted 24 Jul 2023, Published online: 12 Sep 2023

References

  • Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(3):247–253. doi: 10.1002/uog.974.
  • Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220–227. doi: 10.1002/uog.56.
  • Miller R, Timor-Tritsch IE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for maternal-fetal medicine (SMFM) consult series #49: cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):B2–B14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.030.
  • Tang Y, Zhang Y, Tang H, et al. A comparison of ultrasound guided curettage with and without uterine artery embolization on controlling intraoperative blood loss for a cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:651273. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.651273.
  • Wang G, Liu X, Bi F, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic resection for the management of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1501–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.045.
  • Zhu X, Deng X, Xiao S, et al. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(2):144–150. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1104733.
  • Xiao J, Zhang S, Wang F, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):356.e1-356–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.024.
  • Zhuang YL, Huang LL. Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):152.e1-152–e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.038.
  • Xiao J, Shi Z, Zhou J, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: comparing the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with High-Intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(3):640–647. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.001.
  • Spence M, de Repentigny K, Bowman M, et al. Validation of the pictorial blood loss assessment chart using modern sanitary products. Haemophilia. 2021;27(5):e632–e635. doi: 10.1111/hae.14373.
  • Reid PC, Coker A, Coltart R. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study. BJOG. 2000;107(3):320–322. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13225.x.
  • Critchley HOD, Babayev E, Bulun SE, et al. Menstruation: science and society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(5):624–664. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.004.
  • D Critchley HO. Physiology of the endometrium and regulation of menstruation. 2020.
  • Huang L, Du Y, Zhao C. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(1):98–101. doi: 10.1002/uog.12557.
  • Wu F, Chen W-Z, Bai J, et al. Original contribution tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies. 2002.
  • Liu Y, Wang L, Zhu X. Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound compared with uterine artery embolization in cesarean section pregnancy: a meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(6):446–454. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2023.02.021.
  • Cao GS, Liu RQ, Liu YY, et al. Menstruation recovery in scar pregnancy patients undergoing UAE and curettage and its influencing factors. Medicine. 2018;97(11):e9584. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009584.
  • Tropeano G, Litwicka K, Di Stasi C, et al. Permanent amenorrhea associated with endometrial atrophy after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(1):132–135. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04400-x.
  • Hehenkamp WJK, Volkers NA, Broekmans FJM, et al. Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized comparison with hysterectomy. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(7):1996–2005. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem105.
  • Qiu J, Fu Y, Huang X, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism in a patient with cesarean scar pregnancy after receiving uterine artery embolization: a case report. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:117–120. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S147754.
  • Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J minim invasive gynecol. 2017;24(6):915–925. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.019.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.