Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy

References

• Hosni MM, Herath RP, Mumtaz R. Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(5):261–276. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Gan X, Kashyap N, et al. Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and uterine artery embolization in the management of cervical pregnancy. Front Med. 2022;9:990066. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.990066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdés-Martínez OH, Sordia-Hernández LH, Mo S-P, et al. Intrasaccular methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancies maintains fertility: a case series. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2023;43(1):2130207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leeman LM, Wendland CL. Cervical ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis with endovaginal ultrasound examination and successful treatment with methotrexate. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(1):72–77. doi:10.1001/archfami.9.1.72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamaguchi M, Honda R, Erdenebaatar C, et al. Treatment of cervical pregnancy with ultrasound-guided local methotrexate injection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(6):781–787. doi:10.1002/uog.17384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma U, Maggiorotto F. Conservative management of second-trimester cervical ectopic pregnancy with placenta percreta. Fertil. Steril. 2007;87(3):613–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel HS, Alserri A, Reinhold C, et al. Multidose methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(4):359–362. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35217-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang J, Xue M. The treatment of cervical pregnancy with high-intensity focused ultrasound followed by suction curettage: report of three cases. Int. J. Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):273–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yang B, Chen W, et al. Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):85. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05376-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakao Y, Yokoyama M, Iwasaka T. Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage for cervical pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt 2):505–507. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000286771.10377.4e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B, Douglas NC, Guarnaccia MM, et al. Uterine artery embolization as an adjunctive measure to decrease blood loss prior to evacuating a cervical pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279(5):721–724. doi:10.1007/s00404-008-0775-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Cao L, Yan J, et al. Risk factors associated with the failure of initial treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;162(3):937–944. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko HK, Shin JH, Ko GY, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before obstetrical procedures with high risk for massive bleeding. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(2):355–360. doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye M, Yin Z, Xue M, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of placenta accreta. BJOG. 2017;124(Suppl 3):71–77. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu CN, Tang L, Sun Y, et al. Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(3):387–391. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2020.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Dai Y, Yu G, et al. Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):1449–1457. doi:10.1080/02656736.2022.2107715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Deng X, Xiao S, et al. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(2):144–150. doi:10.3109/02656736.2015.1104733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile G, Mangino FP, Romano F, et al. Ectopic cervical pregnancy: treatment route. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(6):293. doi:10.3390/medicina56060293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Shao M, Shao X. Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of cesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(25):e7327. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000007327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu L, Weng H, Wang X. Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;306(3):769–777. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06487-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song D, Liu Y, Xiao Y, et al. A matched cohort study comparing the outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome after uterine artery embolization or surgical trauma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1022–1028. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan G, Xiang X, Guo W, et al. Study of the impact of uterine artery embolization (UAE) on endometrial microvessel density (MVD) and angiogenesis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(4):1079–1085. doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0599-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh GT, Najafi A, Cunier M, et al. Angiographic detection of utero-ovarian anastomosis and influence on ovarian function after uterine artery embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(2):231–237. doi:10.1007/s00270-019-02305-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhu X, Wang L, et al. Clinical analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with hysteroscopy-guided suction curettage (HGSC) in patients with cervical pregnancy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):1233–1237. doi:10.1080/02656736.2022.2123565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar