903
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Pregnancy outcomes of adenomyotic patients with primary infertility after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment

, , &
Article: 2264547 | Received 06 Jul 2023, Accepted 22 Sep 2023, Published online: 30 Oct 2023

References

  • Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus—revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112(5):583–593. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90781-8.
  • Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2427–2433. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2427.
  • Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114.e1–114.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027.
  • Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013.
  • Tellum T, Nygaard S, Lieng M. Noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis: a structured review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):408–418.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001.
  • Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, et al. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3432–3439. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des332.
  • Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(6):730–736. doi: 10.1002/uog.14834.
  • Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1393–1401. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex088.
  • Dueholm M, Aagaard J. Adenomyosis and IVF/ICSI treatment: clinical considerations and recommendations. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2018;13(4):177–179. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2018.1493923.
  • Barrier BF, Malinowski MJ, Dick EJ, et al. Adenomyosis in the baboon is associated with primary infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;82 Suppl 3:1091–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.065.
  • Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, et al. New sonographic classification of adenomyosis: do type and degree of adenomyosis correlate to severity of symptoms?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(6):1308–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.788.
  • Bourdon M, Santulli P, Oliveira J, et al. Focal adenomyosis is associated with primary infertility. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(6):1271–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.018.
  • Buggio L, Dridi D, Barbara G. Adenomyosis: impact on fertility and obstetric outcomes. Reprod Sci. 2021; 28(11):3081–3084. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00679-z.
  • Wu X, Jiang W, Xu H, et al. Characteristics of uterine rupture after laparoscopic surgery of the uterus: clinical analysis of 10 cases and literature review. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(9):3630–3639. doi: 10.1177/0300060518776769.
  • Yoon SH, Lee GJ, Cho HJ, et al. Clinical efficacy of a novel method of fertility preserving adenomyomectomy in infertile women with diffuse adenomyosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(13):e33266. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033266.
  • Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, et al. Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy and hysteroplasty: a novel method. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(2):150–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.12.004.
  • Zhou Y, Shen L, Wang Y, et al. Long-term pregnancy outcomes of patients with diffuse adenomyosis after double-flap adenomyomectomy. J Clin Med. 2022;11(12):3489. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123489.
  • Jacob GP, Oraif A, Power S. When helping hurts: the effect of surgical interventions on ovarian reserve. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016;19(1):3–8. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2016.1148826.
  • Du C, Wang Y, Qu D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging T2WI hyperintense foci number and the prognosis of adenomyosis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;154(2):241–247. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13587.
  • Li W, Mao J, Liu Y, et al. Clinical effectiveness and potential long term benefits of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for patients with adenomyosis. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(12):300060520976492. doi: 10.1177/0300060520976492.
  • Jeng C, Ou K, Long C, et al. 500 Cases of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablated uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(6):865–871. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.09.013.
  • Lee J, Hong G, Lee K, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3214–3221. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.022.
  • Keserci B, Duc NM. The role of T1 perfusion-based classification in predicting the outcome of magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;34(3):306–314. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1326634.
  • Gong C, Wang Y, Lv F, et al. Evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for different types of adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):530–538. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2052366.
  • Parazzini F, Mais V, Cipriani S, et al. Determinants of adenomyosis in women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: results from a prospective multicentric study in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;143(2):103–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.12.010.
  • Huang YF, Deng J, Wei XL, et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes of patients with adenomyosis and infertility treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic excision. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):301–307. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1742390.
  • Zhou CY, Xu XJ, He J. [Pregnancy outcomes and symptom improvement of patients with adenomyosis treated with high intensity focused ultrasound ablation]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;51(11):845–849.
  • Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):393–406. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005.
  • Rabinovici J, Inbar Y, Eylon SC, et al. Pregnancy and live birth after focused ultrasound surgery for symptomatic focal adenomyosis: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(5):1255–1259. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei458.
  • Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(6):707–714. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13159.
  • Liu X, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. Clinical predictors of long-term success in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for adenomyosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(3):e2443. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002443.
  • Khan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, et al. Biological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis with coexisting deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(2):343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.210.