Dark Triad dirty dozen: psychometric properties and measurement invariance in Peruvian adolescents

References

• Ahmed, O., Naher, L., Islam, R., Akter, M., & Deb, S. (2020). Psychometric analyses of the bangla version of the Dark Triad dirty dozen. Heliyon, 6(11), e05341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 186–469. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C., & Caravita, S. C. (2016). Why do early adolescents bully? Exploring the influence of prestige norms on social and psychological motives to bully. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borráz-León, J. I., & Rantala, M. J. (2021). Does the dark triad predict self-perceived attractiveness, mate value, and number of sexual partners both in men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorri, C., Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2019). Does the dark triad manifest similarly in men and women? Measurement invariance of the dirty dozen across gender. Current Psychology, 38(3), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9641-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colegio de Psicólogos del Perú. (2017). Código de ética y deontología. https://www.cpsp.pe/documentos/marco_legal/codigo_de_etica_y_deontologia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Copez-Lonzoy, A., Dominguez-Lara, S., & Merino-Soto, C. (2019). ¿Inestabilidad en el lado oscuro? estructura factorial, invarianza de medición y fiabilidad de la dirty dozen Dark Triad en población [Instability on the dark side? Factorial structure, measurement invariance and reliability of the dirty dozen dark triad in the general population of lima]. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 24(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.24335
   Google Scholar
• Czarna, A. Z., Jonason, P. K., Dufner, M., & Kossowska, M. (2016). The dirty dozen scale: Validation of a polish version and extension of the nomological net. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Medeiros, E. D., Monteiro, R. P., Veloso Gouveia, R. S., da Silva Nascimento, B., & Veloso Gouveia, V. (2017). Dark triad dirty dozen: Avaliando seus parâmetros via TRI. Psico-USF, 22(2), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712017220209
   Google Scholar
• Dinić, B. M., Petrović, B., & Jonason, P. K. (2018). Serbian adaptations of the dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD) and short dark triad (SD3). Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucher, J., Savard, C., & Gamache, D. (2023). Measurement invariance of the dark triad dirty dozen across nonclinical and clinical populations, genders, and age groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 206, 112103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
   Google Scholar
• Gana, K., & Broc, G. (2019). Structural equation modeling with lavaan. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119579038
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, A. L., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the dark triad as a construct. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the dark triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Luévano, V. X. (2013). Walking the thin line between efficiency and accuracy: Validity and structural properties of the dirty dozen. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. D., Schmitt, D. P., Li, N. P., & Crysel, L. (2012). The antihero in popular culture: Life history theory and the dark triad personality traits. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. N. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology (pp. 249–267). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Klimstra, T. A., Sijtsema, J. J., Henrichs, J., & Cima, M. (2014). The Dark Triad of personality in adolescence: Psychometric properties of a concise measure and associations with adolescent adjustment from a multi-informant perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3), 488–524. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling of fit involving a particular measure of model. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maples, J. L., Lamkin, J., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The dirty dozen and short dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Vize, C., Crowe, M. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2019). A critical appraisal of the dark-triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Timmermans, A. (2013). Some youths have a gloomy side: Correlates of the dark triad personality traits in non-clinical adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(5), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0359-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K., & Ardıç, K. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabian, S., De Backer, C. J., & Vandebosch, H. (2015). Dark Triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechorro, P., Jonason, P. K., Raposo, V., & Maroco, J. (2021). Dirty dozen: A concise measure of dark triad traits among at-risk youths. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3522–3531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00288-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda, D., Sandín, B., & Muris, P. (2020). Psychometrics properties of the Spanish version of two dark triad scales: The dirty dozen and the short dark triad. Current Psychology, 39(5), 1873–1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9888-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–93. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savard, C., Simard, C., & Jonason, P. K. (2017). Psychometric properties of the French-Canadian version of the dark triad dirty dozen. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, B., & Pietschnig, J. (2022). Evidence for the superordinate predictive ability of trait psychopathy: The dark triad and quality of sexual life. Personality and Individual Differences, 193, 111620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An Illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura, A., Oshio, A., Tanaka, K., Masui, K., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Development, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-J). Japanese Journal of Personality, 24(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.24.26
   Google Scholar
• Ventura-León, J. (2019). De regreso a la validez basada en el contenido [Back to content-based validity]. Adicciones, 34(4), 323–326. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1213
   Google Scholar
• Webster, G. D., & Jonason, P. K. (2013). Putting the “IRT” in “dirty”: Item response theory analyses of the dark triad dirty dozen—an efficient measure of narcissism, psychopathy, and machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar