What is Edith Penrose’s legacy for the theory of the firm?

References

• Albers, Josef. 1975. Interaction of Color. Westford, Massachusetts: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, V., and C. Bowman. 2009. “What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management?” International Journal of Management Reviews 11 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyres, Nicholas S., and Todd R. Zenger. 2012. “Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries.” Organization Science 23 (6): 1643–1657. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, William J. 1982. “Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure.” The American Economic Review 72 (1): 1–15. American Economic Association.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augier, M., and D. J. Teece. 2007. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. MANAGE. INT. REV. 47, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8
   Google Scholar
• Beinhocker, E. D. 2006. Origin of Wealth Evolution, Complexity and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Cambridge, Massachussetts, USA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Boston Consulting Group Inc. 2014. The Most Innovative Companies 2014: Breaking Through is Hard to Do. Boston, MA, USA: The Boston Consulting Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and A. McAfee. 2012. “Big Data: The Management Revolution.” Harvard Business Review 90 (10): 60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. A., and A. S. Grove. 1996. “Strategic Dissonance.” California Management Review 38 (2): 8–28. Winter 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. A., and A. S. Grove. 2007. “Let Chaos Reign, Then Rein in Chaos—Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (10): 965–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1995. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 2013. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press: Reprint Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Jim. 2001. “From Good to Great- Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don’t”. New York City, NY, USA: Random House Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., and J. G. Harris. 2007. Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, R., and R. Meyer. 2014. Strategy: Process, Content, Context. 4th ed. Boston, Massachussetts, USA: Cengage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gerard, George, Martine R Haas, and Alex Pentland. 2014. “From the Editors: Big Data and Management.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (2): 321–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.4002.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, Jules. 2014.“The Fatal Bias.”Business Strategy Review. London: London Business School. 25 (2): 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Lowell. 2013. “On Robinson, Penrose, and the Resource- Based View.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (1): 125–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2011.565355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review 70, (1 (January–February 1992)): 71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larry, E. Greiner. 1972. “Evolution and Revolution as Organisations Grow.” Harvard Business Review. July-August.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A. 2005. “Edith Penrose’s Legacy to the Resource-Based View.” Managerial and Decision Economics 26 (2): 83–98. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1214.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, J. 2003. “Strategy as Orchestrating Knowledge, Chapter 6.” In Images of Strategy, edited by S Cummings, and D. C Wilson, 136–163. Oxford: Blackwell/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, Angela. 2017. No Ordinary Woman: The Life of Edith Penrose. OUP. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753940.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, Edith. 1956. “Foreign Investment and the Growth of the Firm.” The Economic Journal 66 (262): 220–235. Royal Economic Society. 1 June 1956. https://doi.org/10.2307/2227966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, Edith. 1960. “The Growth of the Firm—A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company.” Business History Review XXXIV (1): 1–23. 1. Spring 1960. Harvard. https://doi.org/10.2307/3111776.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, Edith. 2009. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. 4th ed. Oxford: Introduction Chris Pitelis. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, Jago. 2017. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Chapter 10, No Ordinary Woman: The Life of Edith Penrose, 175–188. Oxford: OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753940.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Pitelis, Christos. 2005. “Edith Penrose, Organisational Economics and Business Strategy: An Assessment and extension.” Managerial and Decision Economics 26 (2): 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Pitelis, Christos N. 2004. “Edith Penrose and the Resource-Based View of (International) Business Strategy.” International Business Review 13 (4): 523–532. August. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 2013. Can Japan Compete? Revisited. Presentation at the Porter Prize Conference Tokyo, Japan December 5th, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M., H. Takeuchi, M. Sakakibara. 2001. Can Japan Compete? Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. 2004. “The Blinders of Dominant Logic.” Long Range Planning 37 (2): 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and A. R. Bettis. 1986. “The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 7 (6): 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston, Ma, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rugman, Alan M., and Alain Verbeke. 2002. “Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-Based View of Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 23 (8): 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.240. August 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaede, U. 2008. Choose and Focus: Japanese Business Strategies for the 21st Century. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. 1994. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York City, NY, USA: Doubleday Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soderberg, M., S. Kalagnanam, N. T. Sheehan, and Vaidyanathan. 2012. “When is a Balanced Scorecard a Balanced Scorecard?” International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management 60 (7): 688–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111167780.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, Ralph. 2006. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity (To Ways of Thinking About Organisations). 6th ed. Harlow, Essex, UK: FT Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509:AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5 (2): 171–178. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zott, C., and R. Amit. 2010. Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective, Long Range Planning, 216–226. Amsterdam, Netherlands.: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar