Exploring the Use of Environmental DNA to Determine the Species of Salmon Redds

REFERENCES

• Barnes, M. A., C. R. Turner, C. L. Jerde, M. A. Renshaw, W. L. Chadderton, and D. M. Lodge. 2014. Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environmental Science and Technology 48:1819–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burner, C. J. 1951. Characteristics of spawning nests of Columbia River salmon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fisheries Bulletin 61:97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Deiner, K., and F. Altermatt. 2014. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE 9(2):e88786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doi, H., K. Uchii, T. Takahara, S. Matsuhashi, H. Yamanaka, and T. Minamoto. 2015. Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE 10(3):e0122763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham, J., B. B. Rieman, and K. Davis. 2001. Sources and magnitude of sampling error in redd counts for Bull Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficetola, G. F., C. Miaud, F. Pompanon, and P. Taberlet. 2008. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters 4:423–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima, M., and W. W. Smoker. 1998. Spawning habitat segregation of sympatric Sockeye and Pink salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. P., and C. M. Gallagher. 2005. Discrimination of Chinook and Coho salmon and steelhead redds and evaluation of the use of redd data for estimating escapement in several unregulated streams in northern California. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:284–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, C. S., K. M. Strickler, and D. S. Pilliod. 2015. Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms. Biological Conservation 183:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, C. S., C. R. Turner, K. Deiner, K. E. Klymus, P. F. Thomsen, M. A. Murphy, S. F. Spear, A. McKee, S. J. Oyler-McCance, R. S. Cornman, M. B. Laramie, A. R. Mahon, R. F. Lance, D. S. Pilliod, K. M. Strickler, L. P. Waits, A. K. Fremier, T. Takahara, J. E. Herder, and P. Taberlet. 2016. Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7:1299–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane, S. F., T. M. Wilcox, K. S. McKelvey, M. K. Young, M. K. Schwartz, W. H. Lowe, B. H. Letcher, and A. R. Whiteley. 2015. Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams. Molecular Ecology Resources 15:216–227.
   Google Scholar
• Lacoursière-Roussel, A., G. Côté, V. Leclerc, and L. Bernatchez. 2016. Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management. Journal of Applied Ecology 53:1148–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laramie, M. B., D. S. Pilliod, and C. S. Goldberg. 2015. Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis. Biological Conservation 183:29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, A. M., S. F. Spear, and T. W. Pierson. 2015. The effect of dilution and the use of a post-extraction nucleic acid purification column on the accuracy, precision, and inhibition of environmental DNA samples. Biological Conservation 183:70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, K. S., M. K. Young, W. L. Knotek, K. J. Carim, T. M. Wilcox, T. M. Padgett-‐Stewart, and M. K. Schwartz. 2016. Sampling large geographic areas for rare species using environmental DNA: a study of Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus occupancy in western Montana. Journal of Fish Biology 88:1215–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhlfeld, C. C., M. L. Taper, D. F. Staples, and B. B. Shepard. 2006. Observer error structure in Bull Trout redd counts in Montana streams: implications for inference on true redd numbers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:643–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilliod, D. S., C. S. Goldberg, R. S. Arkle, and L. P. Waits. 2013. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70:1123–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilliod, D. S., C. S. Goldberg, R. S. Arkle, and L. P. Waits. 2014. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian. Molecular Ecology Resources 14:109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilliod, D. S., and M. B. Laramie. 2016. Salmon redd identification using environmental DNA (eDNA). U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2016-1091, Corvallis, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Spear, S. F., J. D. Groves, L. A. Williams, and L. P. Waits. 2015. Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program. Biological Conservation 183:38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Strickler, K. M., A. K. Fremier, and C. S. Goldberg. 2015. Quantifying the effects of UV, temperature, and pH on degradation rates of eDNA in aquatic microcosms. Biological Conservation 183:85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahara, T., T. Minamoto, H. Yamanaka, H. Doi, and Z. Kawabata. 2012. Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 7(4):e35868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, P. F., and E. Willerslev. 2015. Environmental DNA—an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation 183:4–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, C. R., K. L. Uy, and R. C. Everhart. 2015. Fish environmental DNA is more concentrated in sediments than in surface water. Biological Conservation 183:93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, T. M., K. S. McKelvey, M. K. Young, A. J. Sepulveda, B. B. Shepard, S. F. Jane, and M. K. Schwartz. 2016. Understanding environmental DNA detection probabilities: a case study using a stream-dwelling char Salvelinus fontinalis. Biological Conservation 194:209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. E., and G. H. Reeves. 2000. Population structure of sympatric anadromous and nonanadromous Oncorhynchus mykiss: evidence from spawning surveys and otolith microchemistry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:2152–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar