A Multiregional Approach for Estimating the Economic Impact of Harvest Restrictions on Saltwater Sportfishing

References

• Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 2015. Alaska sport fishing survey. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Sport Fish Division, Juneau. Available: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/sf/sportfishingsurvey/. ( August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. E., and S. T. Lee. 2013. Untangling the recreational value of wild and hatchery salmon. Marine Resource Economics 28:175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armington, P. 1969. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 16:159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, J., R. Teasley, H. Cordell, R. Souter, and D. English. 1996. Effects of reservoir aquatic plant management on recreational expenditures and regional economic activity. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28:409–422.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2011. Annual gross domestic product by state. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. Available: https://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=1&isuri=1&acrdn=2#reqid=70&step=1&isuri=1&acrdn=2. ( August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, W., J. Buteau, K. Hassenmiller, G. Petry, and S. Staitieh. 1981. Economic impacts of the Alaska shellfish fishery: an input–output analysis. Final Report submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri, F., Yaghmaei, S., and Mousavi, S. M., 2010, “Comparison of different methods in bioleaching of tungsten-rich spent hydro-cracking catalyst using adapted penecillum simplicissimum BBRC-20019“. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 21, pp. 1483–1488. doi:10.3303/CET1021248
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, V., and K. Smith. 2013. Valuing nature in a general equilibrium. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66:72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criddle, K., M. Herrmann, S. T. Lee, and C. Hamel. 2003. Participation decisions, angler welfare, and the regional economic impact of sport fishing. Marine Resource Economics 18:291–312.
   Google Scholar
• de Melo, D. J., and D. Tarr. 1992. A general equilibrium analysis of U.S. foreign trade policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Dorow, M., B. Beardmore, W. Haider, and R. Arlinghaus. 2010. Winners and losers of conservation policies for European Eel, Anguilla anguilla: an economic welfare analysis for differently specialised eel anglers. Journal of Fisheries Management and Ecology 17:106–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. 1991. A critique of three “economics” arguments commonly used to influence fishery allocations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 11:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• English, D., and J. Bergstrom. 1994. The conceptual links between recreation site development and regional economic impacts. Journal of Regional Science 34:599–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, B., and S. Steinback. 2008. The economic contribution of marine angler expenditures in the United States, 2006. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-94.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, C., M. Herrmann, S. T. Lee, K. Criddle, and H. Geier. 2002. Linking sport fishing trip attributes, participation decisions, and regional economic impacts in lower and central Cook Inlet, Alaska. Annals of Regional Science 36:247–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himes-Cornell, A., and S. Kasperski. 2016. Using socioeconomic and fisheries involvement to understand Alaska fishing community well-being. Coastal Management 44:36–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, G., K. Sundet, and A. Bingham. 2015. Estimates of participation, catch, and harvest in Alaska sport fisheries during 2011. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Sport Fish Division, Fishery Data Series 15-04, Anchorage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E., and G. Hewings. 2009. An application of the integrated transport network–multi-regional CGE model to the calibration of synergy effects of highway investments. Economic Systems Research 21:377–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., and P. Watson. 2011. Description of the input–output model for Pacific coast fisheries. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-111.
   Google Scholar
• Lew, D., and D. Larson. 2011. A repeated mixed logit approach to valuing a local sport fishery: the case of Southeast Alaska salmon. Land Economics 87:712–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, D., and D. Larson. 2012. Economic values for saltwater sport fishing in Alaska: a stated preference analysis. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:745–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, D., J. Lee, and D. Larson. 2010. Saltwater sport fishing in Alaska: a summary and description of the Alaska saltwater sport fishing economic survey, 2007. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-214.
   Google Scholar
• Lew, D., and C. Seung. 2010. The economic impact of saltwater sportfishing harvest restrictions in Alaska: an empirical analysis of non-resident anglers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, D., and C. Seung. 2014. On the statistical significance of regional economic impacts from changes in recreational fishing harvest limits in southern Alaska. Marine Resource Economics 29:241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, S. J., S. Steinback, and J. Hilger. 2013. The economic contributions of marine angler expenditures in the United States, 2011. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-134.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell Group. 2010. Economic impact of Alaska’s visitor industry, 2008–09. State of Alaska Department of Commerce, Juneau.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., and P. Blair. 1983. Estimating state-level input-output relationships from U.S. multiregional data. International Regional Science Review 8:233–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota IMPLAN Group. 2004. IMPLAN Pro user’s guide. Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Stillwater.
   Google Scholar
• National Marine Fisheries Service. 2017. Commercial fisheries statistics. Available: http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/commercial/landings/annual_landings.html. ( July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2013. Pacific Halibut fisheries; catch sharing plan, final rule. Federal Register 78:51(15 March 2013):16423–16442.
   Google Scholar
• Research Group. 2007. Estimating economic impacts of Alaska fisheries using a computable general equilibrium model–data acquisition and reduction task documentation. Prepared for the Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., and Z. Liu. 2006. The effects of interregional trade flow estimation procedures on multiregional social accounting matrix multipliers. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 36:94–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sepez, J. A., B. D. Tilt, C. L. Package, H. M. Lazarus, and I. Vaccaro. 2005. Community profiles for North Pacific fisheries—Alaska. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-160.
   Google Scholar
• Seung, C., and D. Lew. 2013. Accounting for variation in exogenous shocks in economic impact modeling. Annals of Regional Science 51:711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seung, C., and E. Waters. 2006. A review of regional economic models for fisheries management in the U.S. Marine Resource Economics 21:101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Seung, C., and E. Waters. 2010. Evaluating supply-side and demand-side shocks for fisheries: a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for Alaska. Economic Systems Research 22:87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seung, C., E. Waters, and J. Leonard. 2014. Economic impacts of Alaska fisheries: a multiregional computable general equilibrium (MRCGE) analysis. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 26:155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Shoven, J., and J. Whalley. 1984. Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: an introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature 22:1007–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwick Associates. 2014. Alaska’s nonresident anglers, 2009–2013. Report to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbull, W. N. 1990. Who has standing in cost–benefit analysis? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9:201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, E., D. Holland, and B. Weber. 1997. Economic impacts of a property tax limitation: a computable general equilibrium analysis of Oregon’s measure 5. Land Economics 73:72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, E., and C. Seung. 2010. Impacts of recent shocks to Alaska fisheries: a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model analysis. Marine Resource Economics 25:155–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, E., C. Seung, M. Hartley, and M. Dalton. 2014. Measuring the multiregional economic contribution of an Alaska fishing fleet with linkages to international markets. Marine Policy 50(Part A):238–248.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, D., and D. McRae Jr. 1986. The issue of standing in cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5: 665–682.
   Google Scholar