Discard Estimates from Self-Reported Catch Data: an Example from the U.S. Northeast Shelf

REFERENCES

• Aarts, G., and J. Poos. 2009. Comprehensive discard reconstruction and abundance estimation using flexible selectivity functions. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66:763–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, H., and J. Allard. 2009. Can the data from at-sea observer surveys be used to make general inferences about catch composition and discards? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:2025–2039.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, J., and D. Altman. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaylock, J., S. Wigley, P. Rago, M. Mood, and M. Palmer 2015. A brief description of greater Atlantic region fish and invertebrate discard estimation for the 2015 update to the National Bycatch Report. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 15-03, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, A., and G. Pilling. 2007. Landings, logbooks and observer surveys: improving the protocols for sampling commercial fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 8:123–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A., and D. Voss. 1999. Design and analysis of experiments. Springer Science + Business Media, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dobby, H., L. Allan, M. Harding, C. H. Laurenson, and H. A. McLay. 2008. Improving the quality of information on Scottish anglerfish fisheries: making use of fishers’ data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65:1334–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorner, H., N. Graham, G. Bianchi, A. Bjordal, M. Frederiksen, W. Karp, S. Kennelly, J. Martinsohn, K. Murray, M. Pastoors, and N. Gudbrandsen. 2015. From cooperative data collection to full collaboration and co-management: a synthesis of the 2014 ICES symposium on fishery-dependent information. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72:1133–1139.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, D., and R. Starr. 1996. Comparison of commercial fishery and research catch data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:2681–2694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giavarina, D. 2015. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica 25:141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GMA (Gulf of Maine Aquarium). 2001. Study fleet and industry based survey meeting summary, November/December 2000. Gulf of Maine Aquarium, Portland, Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. W. E. 1998. The quantification of perceptual and behavioural variation in commercial fishing logbooks. Master’s thesis. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
   Google Scholar
• Hoare, D., N. Graham, and P. J. Schon. 2011. The Irish Sea data-enhancement project: comparison of self-sampling and national data-collection programmes—results and experiences. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68:1778–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, R., D. Wilson, and P. Ramirez-Monsalve. 2012. Empowerment and regulation dilemmas in participatory fisheries science. Fish and Fisheries 13:291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., and W. Van Densen. 2007. Benefits and organization of cooperative research for fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64:834–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, W., L. Desfosse, and S. Brooke. 2011. U.S National Bycatch Report. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-117E.
   Google Scholar
• Kraan, M., S. Uhlmann, J. Steenbergen, A. Van Helmond, and L. Van Hoof. 2013. The optimal process of self-sampling in fisheries: lessons learned in The Netherlands. Journal of Fish Biology 83:963–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggins, G., M. Bradley, and S. Kennelly. 1997. Detection of bias in observer-based estimates of retained discarded catches from a multispecies trawl fishery. Fisheries Research 32:133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miona, M., C. Piras, T. Fortibuoni, I. Celi, G. Franceschini, A. Giovanardi, A. Belardinelli, M. Martinelli, and S. Raicevich. 2015. Collection and validation of self-sampled e-logbook data in a Mediterranean demersal trawl fishery. Regional Studies in Marine Science 2:76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEFMC (New England Fishery Management Council). 2009. Final Amendment 16 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan, including a final supplemental environmental impact statement and an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. NEFMC, Technical Report, Newburyport, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2015a. New England Electronic Monitoring Project: phase III, in Northeast Fisheries Science Center Fishery Sampling Branch Electronic Monitoring Project Summary 2010–2014. National Marine Fisheries Service, NEFSC, Fisheries Sampling Branch, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2015b. Operational assessment of 20 Northeast groundfish stocks, updated through 2014. National Marine Fisheries Service, NEFSC, Reference Document 15-24, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center). 2016. Sampling Branch observer operations manual. National Marine Fisheries Service, NEFSC, Fisheries Sampling Branch, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M., P. Hersey, H. Marotta, G. Shield, and S. Cierpich. 2016. The design and performance of an automated observer deployment system for the northeastern United States groundfish fishery. Fisheries Research 179:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M., S. Wigley, J. Hoey, and J. Palmer. 2007. An evaluation of the Northeast region’s study fleet pilot program and electronic logbook system: phases I and II. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-204.
   Google Scholar
• Punt, A., D. Smith, G. Tuck, and R. Methot. 2006. Including discard data in fisheries stock assessments: two case studies from south-eastern Australia. Fisheries Research 79:239–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rago, P., S. Wigley, and M. Fogarty. 2005. Northeast Fisheries Science Center bycatch estimation methodology: allocation, precision, and accuracy. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 05-09, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, S., N. Jacobson, and S. Cadrin. 2011. Assessing the reliability of fisher self-sampling programs. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 31:165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, P. 2010. Fisher-collected sampling data: lessons from the New Zealand experience. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 2:47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, P., and M. Vignaux. 1997. Comparison of data from voluntary logbook and research catch-sampling programmes in the New Zealand lobster fishery. Marine and Freshwater Research 48:1075–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., J. Blaylock, P. Rago, K. Murray, T. Nies, R. Seagraves, D. Potts, and K. Drew. 2012a. Standardized bycatch reporting methodology, 3-year review report 2011, part 2. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 12-27, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., J. Blaylock, P. Rago, and G. Shield. 2012b. Discard estimation, precision, and sample size analyses for 14 federally managed species groups in the Northeast region. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 12-17, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., P. Rago, K. Sosebee, and D. Palka. 2006. The analytic component to the standardized bycatch reporting methodology omnibus amendment: sampling design and estimation of precision and accuracy. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 0622, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., C. Tholke, J. Blaylock, P. Rago, and G. Shield. 2015. Discard estimation, precision, and sample size analyses for 14 federally managed species groups in the waters off the northeastern United States. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 15-04, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, C., and K. Matsuura. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research 30:79–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar