Understanding How Angler Characteristics and Context Influence Angler Preferences for Fishing Sites

REFERENCES

• Arlinghaus, R., J. Alós, A. B. Beardmore, K. Daedlow, M. Dorow, M. Fujitani, D. Huhn, W. Haider, L. M. Hunt, and C. Wolter. 2017. Understanding and managing freshwater recreational fisheries as complex adaptive social–ecological systems. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture 25:1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R., A. B. Beardmore, C. Riepe, J. Meyerhoff, and T. Pagel. 2014. Species-specific preferences of German recreational anglers for freshwater fishing experiences, with emphasis on the intrinsic utilities of fish stocking and wild fishes: utility of stocking to freshwater anglers. Journal of Fish Biology 85:1843–1867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardmore, B., W. Haider, L. M. Hunt, and R. Arlinghaus. 2011. The importance of trip context for determining primary angler motivations: are more specialized anglers more catch-oriented than previously believed? North American Journal of Fisheries Management 31:861–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardmore, B., W. Haider, L. M. Hunt, and R. Arlinghaus. 2013. Evaluating the ability of specialization indicators to explain fishing preferences. Leisure Sciences 35:273–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, H. 1977. Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: the case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research 9:174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, second edition. Springer Science, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, C., S. A. Schroeder, and D. C. Fulton. 2012. Site choice among Minnesota Walleye anglers: the influence of resource conditions, regulations and catch orientation on lake preference. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R., W. A. Brock, G. J. A. Hansen, J. F. Hansen, J. M. Hennessy, D. A. Isermann, E. J. Pedersen, K. M. Perales, A. L. Rypel, G. G. Sass, T. D. Tunney, and M. J. Vander Zanden. 2017. Defining a safe operating space for inland recreational fisheries. Fish and Fisheries. 18:1150–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criddle, K. R., M. Herrmann, and C. Hamel. 2003. Participation decisions, angler welfare, and the regional economic impact of sportfishing. Marine Resource Economics 18:291–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ditton, R., D. Loomis, and S. Choi. 1992. Recreation specialization: re-conceptualization from a social worlds perspective. Journal of Leisure Research 24:33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorow, M., A. B. Beardmore, W. Haider, and R. Arlinghaus. 2009. Winners and losers of conservation policies for European Eel, Anguilla anguilla: an economic welfare analysis for differently specialised anglers. Fisheries Management and Ecology 17:106–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, E., J. Abbott, and B. Huang. 2013b. Modeling angler behavior as a part of the management system: synthesizing a multi-disciplinary literature. Fish and Fisheries 14:137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, E. P., B. Gentner, and R. Arlinghaus. 2013a. Normative considerations for recreational fishery management: a bioeconomic framework for linking positive science and normative fisheries policy decisions. Fisheries Management and Ecology 20:223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2013. 2010 Survey of recreational fishing in Canada: Annex C, other statistical tables. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Freshwater Fisheries Society of British Columbia. 2016. Casting further: 2015–2016 annual report. Freshwater Fisheries Society of British Columbia, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Haab, T., R. Hicks, K. Schnier, and J. Whitehead. 2012. Angler heterogeneity and the species-specific demand for marine recreational fishing. Marine Resource Economics 27:229–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L. 1994. A step by step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. M. 2005. Recreational fishing site choice models: insights and future opportunities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10:153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. M., P. Boxall, and B. Boots. 2007. Predicting fishing participation and site choice while accounting for spatial substitution, trip timing, and trip context. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:832–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. M., S. G. Sutton, and R. Arlinghaus. 2013. Illustrating the critical role of human dimensions research for understanding and managing recreational fisheries within a social–ecological system framework. Fisheries Management and Ecology 20:111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutt, C. P., K. M. Hunt, J. W. Schlechte, and D. L. Buckmeier. 2013. Effects of catfish angler catch-related attitudes on fishing trip preferences. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33:965–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, F., R. Arlinghaus, and U. Dieckmann. 2010. Diversity and complexity of anger behavior drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67:1507–1531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., M. H. Ranson, E. Y. Besedin, and E. C. Helm. 2006. What determines willingness to pay per fish? A meta-analysis of recreational fishing values. Marine Resource Economics 21:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-S., D. Scott, and J. Crompton. 1997. An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavioral involvement, commitment and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. Journal of Leisure Research 29:320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoche, S., and F. Lupi. 2016. Demand for fishery regulations: effects of angler heterogeneity and catch improvements on preferences for gear and harvest restrictions. Fisheries Research 181:163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., and A. L. Robb. 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68:715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld, W. F. 2010. Marketing research methods in SAS: experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, P. A. 1988. The future of fisheries management: managing the fisherman. Fisheries 13(1):3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, D. K., and D. M. Larson. 2014. Is a fish in hand worth two in the sea? Evidence from a stated preference study. Fisheries Research 157:124–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, W.-C., R. Arlinghaus, and T. Mehner. 2006. Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing: insights for management and conservation. Reviews in Fisheries Science 14:305–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., D. Hensher, and J. Swait. 2000. Stated choice methods. Cambridge University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lupi, F., J. Hoehn, and G. Christie. 2003. Using an economic model of recreational fishing to evaluate the benefits of Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control on the St. Marys River. Journal of Great Lakes Research 29:742–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F. 1977. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8:229–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Pages 105–142 in P. Zarembka, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Melstrom, R. T., and F. Lupi. 2013. Valuing recreational fishing in the Great Lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33:1184–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M., and M. S. Needleman. 1997. The welfare effects of toxic contamination in freshwater fish. Land Economics 73:211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, C.-O., and R. B. Ditton. 2006. Using recreation specialization to understand multi-attribute management preferences. Leisure Sciences 28:369–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J., and E. A. Parkinson. 2012. Temporal and spatial patterns of angler effort across lake districts and policy options to sustain recreational fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 69:321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provencher, B., and R. Bishop. 2004. Does accounting for heterogeneity improve the forecasting ability of a random utility model? A case study. Journal of Environmental Ecology and Management 48:793–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrogin, D., R. Hofler, K. Boyle, and J. W. Milon. 2010. An efficiency approach to choice set formation: theory and application to recreational destination choice. Applied Economics 42:333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. G. 2003. Personal and situational determinants of catch-and-release choice of freshwater anglers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8:109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J. 1994. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2:77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 1998. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74:230–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H. G. M., M. S. Allen, E. V. Camp, N. Cole, L. M. Hunt, B. Matthias, J. R. Post, K. Wilson, and R. Arlinghaus. 2016. Understanding and managing social–ecological feedbacks in spatially structured recreational fisheries: the overlooked behavioral dimension. Fisheries 41:524–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H. G. M., M. S. Quinn, and J. R. Post. 2013. Angler characteristics and management implications in a large, multistock, spatially structured recreational fishery. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33:576–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C., C. F. Dumas, C. E. Landry, and J. Herstine. 2013. A recreation demand model of the North Carolina for-hire fishery: a comparison of primary and secondary purpose anglers. Applied Economics Letters 20:1481–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar