An Evaluation of Patients' Willingness to Trade Symptom-Free Days for Asthma-Related Treatment Risks: A Discrete Choice Experiment

References

• Statistics Canada. National population health survey. 2001, Retrieved 20 June 2006; Available from http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/health50a.htm
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma: National Heart, Blood, Lung Institute. Full Report 2007
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Health Report 2003: Shaping the future, Retrieved 24 April 2006; Available from http://www.who.int/whr/2003/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Global Initiative for Asthma. Pocket guide for asthma management and prevention. National Institute of Health, Bethesda (MD) Nov, 1998, NIH Pub. No. 96-3569B
   Google Scholar
• Boulet L-P, Becker A, Bérubé D, Beveridge R, Ernst P. Canadian asthma consensus report. Can Med Assoc J 1999; 161(11 Supp)S1–62
   Google Scholar
• The British Thoracic Society, the British Paediatric Association, the Royal College of Physicians of London, the King's Fund Centre, the National Asthma Campaign, the Royal College of General Practitioners, the General Practitioners in Asthma Group, the British Association of Accident and Emergency Medicine, and the British Paediatric Respiratory Group. Guidelines on the management of asthma. Thorax 1993; 48(Suppl 2)S1–24
   Google Scholar
• Chapman K R, Ernst P, Grenville A, Dewland P, Zimmerman S. Control of asthma in Canada: failure to achieve guideline targets. Can Respir J 2001; 8(Suppl A)35A–40A
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anis A H, Lynd L D, Wang X H, King G, Spinelli J J, FitzGerald M, Bai T, Paré P. Double trouble: inappropriate asthma medication use linked to increased use of health care resources. Can Med Assoc J 2001; 164(5)625–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd L D, Guh D P, Paré P D, Anis A H. Patterns of inhaled asthma medication use: a 3-year longitudinal analysis of prescription claims data from British Columbia, Canada. Chest 2002; 122(6)1973–1981
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald J M, Boulet L-P, McIvor R A, Zimmerman S, Chapman K R. Asthma control in Canada remains sub optimal: the Reality of Asthma control (TRAC) study. Can Respir J 2006; 13: 253–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paltiel A D, Fuhlbrigge A L, Kitch B T, Liljas B, Weiss S T, Neumann P J, Kuntz K M. Cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: results from the asthma policy model. J Allery Clin Immunol 201; 108(1)39–46
   Google Scholar
• Lynd L D, Sandford A J, Kelly E A, Paré P D, Bai T R, FitzGerald J M, Anis A H. Reconcilable differences—a cross-sectional study of the relationship between socioeconomic status and the magnitude of short-acting-agonist use in asthma. Chest 2004; 126(4)1161–1168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suissa S, Ernst P, Benayoun S, Baltzan M, Cai B. Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(5)332–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, Ferrier K, Payne S. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001; 323: 908–911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Von Neuman J, Morgensterm O. Theory of games and economic behaviour. Wiley, New York 1953
   Google Scholar
• Torrance G W, Thomas W H, Sackett D L. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res 1972; 7: 119–133
   Google Scholar
• Maas A, Stalpers L. Assessing utilities by means of conjoint measurement: an application in medical decision analysis. Med Decis Making 1992; 12(4)288–297
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Bate A, Eastmond D J, Ludbrook A. Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(Suppl 1)i55–i60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson F R, Desvousges W H, Ruby M C, Stieb D, De Civita P. Eliciting stated health preferences: an application to willingness to pay for longevity. Med Decision Making 1998; 18: S57–S67
   Google Scholar
• Johnson F R, Banzhaf M R, Desvousges W H. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated preference approach. Health Econ 2000; 9: 295–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsbaugh T A, Chambers C V, Diamond J J. Asthma controller medications: what do patients want?. J Asthma 1999; 36(7)591–596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson G, Stallberg B, Tornling G, Andersson S, Karlsson G S, Fält K, Berggren F. Asthma treatment preference study: a conjoint analysis of preferred drug treatments. Chest 2004; 125: 916–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe J, Van Haselen R, Buxton M, Hardy K, Coleman J, Partridge M. Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study. Thorax 2002; 57: 503–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman L M, McKenzie L, Cairns J, Friend J A, Godden D J, Legge J S, Douglas J G. Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms. Thorax 2001; 56: 138–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancsar E J, Hall J P, King M, Kenny P, Louviere J J, Fiebig D G, Hossain I, Thien F C, Reddel H K, Jenkins C R. Using discrete choice experiments to investigate subject preferences for preventive asthma medication. Respirol 2007; 12: 127–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Hall J, Lanscar E, Fiebig D, Hossain I, Louviere J, Reddel H K, Jenkins C R. Patient preference for managing asthma: a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2007; 16(7)703–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocur G, Adlter T, Hyman W, Aunet B. Guide to forecasting travel demand with direct utility assessment. United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 1982, Report No.: UMTA-NH-11-0001-82-1
   Google Scholar
• Hensher D A, Rose J M, Greene W H. Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005
   Google Scholar
• Crapo R O, Morris A H, Gardner R M. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 123(6)659–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry–1987 update. Statement of the American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136(5)1285–1298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E F, Guyatt G H, Ferrie P J, Griffith L E. Measuring quality of life in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147(4)832–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E, Guyatt G, Epstein R. Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax 1992; 47: 76–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E F, Buist A S, Cox F M, Ferrie P J, King D R. Validation of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chest 1999; 115(5)1265–1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Economic Applications, C F Manski, D McFadden. MIT Press, Boston 1981; 422–434
   Google Scholar
• SAS: The MDC procedure. 2006, Retrieved 2 April 2006; Available from http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/papers/mdc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to evaluate health care programmes: current practice and future reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2(1)55–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan M, Skåtun D. Modeling non-demanders in choice experiments. Health Econ 2004; 11: 397–402
   Google Scholar
• Cheung S, Long J S. Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociol Methods Res 2007; 35(4)583–600
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Major K, Skatun D. Using discrete choice experiments to go beyond clinical outcomes when evaluating clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2005; 11(4)328–338
   Google Scholar
• Lanscar E, Louviere J. Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigation or imposing preferences?. Health Econ 2006; 15: 797–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenschein K, Johannesson M. Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998; 80(2)189–194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zillich A J, Blumenschein K, Johannesson M, Freeman P. Assessment of the relationship between measures of disease severity, quality of life, and willingness to pay in asthma. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20(4)257–265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Government of British Columbia, Ministry of Health: Pharmacare. 2006, Retrieved 8 August 2006; Available from http://www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/pharme/plani/planiinfo.html#M
   Google Scholar
• Mark T L, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decision. Health Econ 2004; 13: 563–573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe J, Buxton M, McGarry T, Sheldon R, Chancellor J. Patients' preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for arthritis. Rheumatol 2004; 43: 337–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculpher M J, Buxton M J. The episode-free day as a composite measure of effectiveness. Pharmacoeconomics 1993; 4: 345–352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar