The association of having a monitoring or blunting coping style with psychological distress, health-related quality of life and satisfaction with healthcare in gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients

References

• Corless CL, Fletcher JA, Heinrich MC. Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(18):3813–3825. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(10):1466–1478. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1466-GSTROM.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Graaf WTA, Tielen R, Bonenkamp JJ, et al. Nationwide trends in the incidence and outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the imatinib era. Br J Surg. 2018;105(8):1020–1027. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg BL, Judson I. Surgery and imatinib in the management of GIST: emerging approaches to adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004; 11(5):465–475. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2004.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casali PG, Blay JY, Abecassis N, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(1):20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikfarjam M, Kimchi E, Shereef S, et al. Surgical outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted drug therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(11):2023–2031. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0561-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi M, Ns IJ, Hollander DD, et al. Improved efficacy of first-line imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): the dutch GIST registry data. Target Oncol. 2023;18(3):415–423. doi: 10.1007/s11523-023-00960-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, et al. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50(5):992–1003. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.5.992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SM. Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(2):345–353. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg A. The effects of coping style on psychological reactions to colposcopy among low-income minority women. JReproduct Medi. 1994;39:711–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gard D, Edwards PW, Harris J, et al. Sensitizing effects of pretreatment measures on cancer chemotherapy nausea and vomiting. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(1):80–84. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.1.80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman C, Rimer B, Blumberg B, et al. Effects of coping style and relaxation on cancer chemotherapy side effects and emotional responses. Cancer Nurs. 1990;13(5):308–315. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199010000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottaro R, Faraci P. The influence of socio-demographics and clinical characteristics on coping strategies in cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(11):8785–8803. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07267-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poll-Franse LV, Horevoorts N, Mv E, et al. The patient reported outcomes following initial treatment and long term evaluation of survivorship registry: scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts. Eur J Cancer. 2011; 47(14):2188–2194. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, et al. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis care & research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(2):156–163. doi: 10.1002/art.10993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zuuren FJ, de Groot KI, Mulder NL, et al. Coping with medical threat: an evaluation of the threatening medical situations inventory (TMSI). Pers Individ Differ. 1996;/21(1):21–31. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00029-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olssøn I, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The hospital anxiety and depression rating scale: a cross-sectional study of psychometrics and case finding abilities in general practice. BMC Psychiatry. 2005;5(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrack BJ, Ganz PA, Bernaards CA, et al. Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long‐term survivors. Psychooncology. 2006;15(5):407–421. doi: 10.1002/pon.963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custers JAE, van den Berg SW, van Laarhoven HWM, et al. The cancer worry scale: detecting fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(1):E44–E50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182813a17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, et al. An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(15):2726–2738. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. In: Smith JA, editor, Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: SAGE Publications; 2015. p. 222–248.
   Google Scholar
• Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(1):89–96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.0107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rooij BH, Ezendam NPM, Vos MC, et al. Patients’ information coping styles influence the benefit of a survivorship care plan in the ROGY care trial: new insights for tailored delivery. Cancer. 2019;125(5):788–797. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson L-M, Nordin K, Glimelius B, et al. Differential effects of cancer rehabilitation depending on diagnosis and patients’ cognitive coping style. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(6):971–980. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000028825.64279.f2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sincero SM. Theories of coping. 2012 [cited 2023 Jul 20]. Available from: https://explorable.com/theories-of-coping
   Google Scholar
• Ong LML, Visser MRM, Van Zuuren FJ, et al. Cancer patients’ coping styles and doctor–patient communication. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8(2):155–166. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199903/04)8:2<155::AID-PON350>3.0.CO;2-A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuuren FJ, Dooper R. Coping style and self-reported health promotion and disease detection behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 1999;4(1):81–89. doi: 10.1348/135910799168489.
   Google Scholar
• Eheman CR, Berkowitz Z, Lee J, et al. Information-seeking styles among cancer patients before and after treatment by demographics and use of information sources. J Health Commun. 2009;14(5):487–502. doi: 10.1080/10810730903032945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geryk LL, Blalock SJ, DeVellis RF, et al. Medication-related self-management behaviors among arthritis patients: does attentional coping style matter? Open Rheumatol J. 2016;10(1):60–70. doi: 10.2174/1874312901610010060.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilt LM, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. In: Gotlib IH, Hammen CL, editors, Handbook of depression. The Guilford Press; 2014. p. 355–373.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, Layous K, Chancellor J, et al. Thinking about rumination: the scholarly contributions and intellectual legacy of Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11(1):1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robichaud M, Dugas MJ, Conway M. Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral variables. J Anxiety Disord. 2003;17(5):501–516. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00237-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rood JA, Van Zuuren FJ, Stam F, et al. Cognitive coping style (monitoring and blunting) and the need for information, information satisfaction and shared decision making among patients with haematological malignancies. Psychooncology. 2015;24(5):564–571. doi: 10.1002/pon.3699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HP, Baerveldt C, Olesen F, et al. Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expect. 2003;6(2):160–181. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00221.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vosbergen S, Peek N, Mulder-Wiggers JMR, et al. An online survey to study the relationship between patients’ health literacy and coping style and their preferences for self-management-related information. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8:631–642. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S57797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SM, Mangan CE. Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: should the doctor tell all? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;45(1):223–236. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.45.1.223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederland CG. Wie zijn we? [20-07-2023]. Available from: https://www.contactgroepgist.nl/over-ons/.
   Google Scholar